Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Jyming Wang Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$23k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Arts & Culture$36kEducation$36kInternational$13kHuman Services$11kHealth$6kFood & Nutrition$3kRecreation & Sports$2kEnvironment$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$4,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$464k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHINESE CHRISTIAN HERALD CRUSADES$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
CHILDREN'S SOCIETY ORCHESTRA$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
THE METROPOLITAN OPERA$2,750
SACRED HEART CATHOLIC ACADEMY$1,000
SALVATION ARMY$400
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHINESE CHRISTIAN HERALD CRUSADES: $5k → 13%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $100 → 14%CHINESE CHRISTIAN HERALD CRUSADES: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OR
NJ
MD
NC
DC
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$111k · 22 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
8

Total granted

$111k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+25%

Still filing today

45%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHuman ServicesArts & CultureHealthFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION
    4× · 2018–2022 · $7k · revenue +91%
  • NY
    NEW YORK CITY BALLET INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $5k · revenue +21%
  • BC
    BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $3k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • QB
    QUEENS BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +25%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +20%
  • AE
    ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MED
    one grant, 2017 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
2
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
3
Americares Foundation Inc

Americares mission is to help people and communities around the world access (see schedule o).

International
4
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
5
United States Pharmacopeial Convention

Usp's mission is to improve global health through public standards and related programs that help ensure the quality, safety, and benefit of medicines and foods.

Health
6
International Committee of the Red Cross

The international committee of the red cross (switzerland)(icrc) is an impartial, neutral, and independent organization whose exclusively humanitarian mission is to protect the lives and dignity of victims of armed conflict and of violence…

International
7
International Rescue Committee Inc

The International Rescue Committee responds to the world's worst humanitarian crises and helps people whose lives and livelihoods are shattered by conflict and disaster to survive, recover, and gain control of their future.

International
8
Project Hope - the People-to-People Health Foundation Inc

To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they…

International
9
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
10
Mary's Meals Usa Inc

To raise donations to (i) provide a daily meal in a place of education for children in the world's poorest communities; (ii) occasionally provide relief for those suffering, in any part of the world, as a result of humanitarian crises…

International
11
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
12
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc and the most unlike its peers is Living Hope for Children. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $32,510 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE METROPOLITAN OPERA — $12,500 · OtherTHE METROPOLITAN OPERATHE CHILDRENS ORCHESTRA SOCIET — $6,500 · OtherTHE CHILDRENS ORCHESTRA SOCIETCHILDREN'S SOCIETY ORCHESTRA — $6,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S SOCIETY ORCHESTRAIndividual grant recipient — $6,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $2,700 · Other+10 more — $10,150 · Other+10 moreCHINESE CHRISTIAN HERALD CRUSADES INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesCHINESE CHR…LIVING HOPE FOR CHILDREN — $1,340 · Human ServicesLIVING HOPE…+1 more — $100 · Human ServicesPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $7,000 · HealthPARTNERS …BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $3,000 · HealthBLOOD CAN…NEW YORK CITY BALLET INC — $4,500 · Arts & CultureDancing Classrooms Inc — $4,100 · Arts & CultureMercy Corps — $2,500 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $1,000 · InternationalRevived Soldiers Ukraine — $1,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $500 · InternationalCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS — $2,782 · Food & NutritionFRESH AIR FUND — $1,700 · Recreation & SportsQUEENS BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY INC — $1,000 · Environment
Other$76,360Human Services$11,440Health$10,000Arts & Culture$8,600International$5,000Food & Nutrition$2,782Recreation & Sports$1,700Environment$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHINESE CHRISTIAN HERALD CRUSADES INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK CITY BALLET INC — $4,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDancing Classrooms Inc — $4,100 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $3,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS — $2,782 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Corps — $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRESH AIR FUND — $1,700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLIVING HOPE FOR CHILDREN — $1,340 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetQUEENS BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRevived Soldiers Ukraine — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMULTIPLE SCLEROSIS FOUNDATION INC — $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHINESE CHRISTIAN HERALD CRUSADES INC
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION
  • Who funds NEW YORK CITY BALLET INC
  • Who funds Dancing Classrooms Inc
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
  • Who funds CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS
  • Who funds Mercy Corps
  • Who funds FRESH AIR FUND
  • Who funds LIVING HOPE FOR CHILDREN
  • Who funds QUEENS BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds Revived Soldiers Ukraine
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
  • Who funds MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jyming Wang Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Mercy Corps47% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph