Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jwhands Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$550
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Civil Rights$5kArts & Culture$4kCrime & Legal$3kHealth$2kInternational$2kEducation$850Public Benefit$750Environment$400Other$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$300
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HUDSON LINK FOR HIGHER ED IN PRISON$550
LEGACY HEALTH NTICU NURSES ED FUND$307
HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH$300
EDUCATION THROUGH MUSIC$300
SCARSDALE VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE CORPS$300
JAY HERITAGE CENTER$300
FRIENDS OF THE WESTCHESTER BAND$300
NAACP LEGAL DEF AND EDUC FUND$300
LYNDHURST NATIONAL TRUST$300
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FED OF COLUMWLL$300
FAMILY SERVICES OF WESTCHESTER$250
FLYING FOCUS VIDEO COLLECTIVE$250
LEARNING ALLY$250
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS PDX ED FUND$250
PEACE AND JUSTICE WORKS$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $350) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LEARNING ALLY: $250 → 6%LEARNING ALLY: $100 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$15k · 18 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +1% since the first grant, against -9% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
14

Total granted

$15k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
-9%

Still filing today

39%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureInternationalCivil RightsEducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ET
    EDUCATION THROUGH MUSIC INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $2k · revenue +1%
  • FS
    FAMILY SERVICES OF WESTCHESTER INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $750 · revenue +63%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $700 · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC
    one grant, 2020 · $200 · revenue -54%
  • LO
    LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF PRTLND ED
    one grant, 2020 · $100
  • W
    WESLEYAN
    one grant, 2024 · $100
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
2
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
3
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Sarah Lawrence College

At sarah lawrence college, our mission is to graduate citizens of the world who are diverse in every definition of the word, who take intellectual and creative risks, and who are able to focus exceptional intellectual discipline (continued…

Education
11
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
12
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Naacp Legal Defense & Educ Fund Inc; the most unlike its peers is Family Services of Westchester Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
6/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HUDSON LINK FOR HIGHER ED IN PRISON: $1,800 · OtherHUDSON LINK FOR HIGHER ED IN PRISONFLYING FOCUS VIDEO COLLECTIVE: $1,600 · OtherFLYING FOCUS VIDEO COLLECTIVEPEACE AND JUSTICE WORKS INC: $1,500 · OtherPEACE AND JUSTICE WORKS INCPLANNED PARENTHOOD FED OF COLUMWLL: $800 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD FED OF COLUMWLLNAACP LEGAL DEF AND EDUC FUND: $800 · OtherNAACP LEGAL DEF AND EDUC FUNDFRIENDS OF THE WESTCHESTER BAND INC: $800 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE WESTCHESTER BAND INCFAMILY SERVICES OF WESTCHESTER INC: $750 · OtherFAMILY SERVICES OF WESTCHESTER INCIndividual grant recipient: $700 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $500 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS SERVICE COMMITTEE: $500 · OtherMENTAL HEALTH ASSNWESTCHESTER: $500 · Other+16 more: $2,857 · Other+16 moreEDUCATION THROUGH MUSIC INC: $1,550 · Arts & CultureEDUCATION THROU…THE JAY HERITAGE CENTER: $800 · Arts & CultureTHE JAY HERITAG…PARTNERS FOR SACRED PLACES INC: $100 · Arts & CultureHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $800 · InternationalHUMAN RIG…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $700 · InternationalMEDECINS …Learning Ally Inc: $350 · Human ServicesNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC: $200 · Civil RightsSCARSDALE FOUNDATION: $100 · PhilanthropyWestchester Land Trust Inc: $100 · Environment
Other$13,107Arts & Culture$2,450International$1,500Human Services$350Civil Rights$200Philanthropy$100Environment$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEDUCATION THROUGH MUSIC INC: $1,550 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JAY HERITAGE CENTER: $800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY SERVICES OF WESTCHESTER INC: $750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $700 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSCARSDALE VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE CORPS INC: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLearning Ally Inc: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSCARSDALE FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWestchester Land Trust Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJACKIE ROBINSON FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPowerMyLearning Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS FOR SACRED PLACES INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EDUCATION THROUGH MUSIC INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JAY HERITAGE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICES OF WESTCHESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds SCARSDALE VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE CORPS INC ↗
  • Who funds Learning Ally Inc ↗
  • Who funds NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds SCARSDALE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Westchester Land Trust Inc ↗
  • Who funds JACKIE ROBINSON FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PowerMyLearning Inc ↗
  • Who funds WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS FOR SACRED PLACES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA7.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jwhands Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jwhands Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Learning Ally Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Wesleyan University: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Jwhands Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Jwhands Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jwhands’ filings →

More from the funding graph