Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jura International

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$38k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$19k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$107kEducation$90kInternational$19kArts & Culture$4kCommunity Improvement$2kHealth$1kPublic Safety & Disaster$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $19k
$1,650
Median grant
4
States reached
$69k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY$19,000
KOREAN BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY$6,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
YEO MYUNG SCHOOL$2,100
CRISWELL COLLEGE$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,650
MARYLAND AND DELAWARE KBA$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
GLOWING HEART MINISTRIES$1,000
TULSA KOREAN BAPTIST CHURCH$300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 73% of grant dollars ($169k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 27% that went abroad ($61k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–23, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%YUST PUST FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%YUST PUST FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
CA
VA
MD
NC
OK
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 27% of all-years giving ($61k)

3 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
India$39k · 2 grants
South Korea$12k · 3 grants
China$10k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$151k · 7 repeat orgs$79k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
22

Total granted

$151k
$68k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+17%

Still filing today

29%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’23’24
EducationReligionHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DB
    DALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2020–2024 · $53k · revenue +31%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2023–2024 · $43k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2023–2024 · $39k

Funded once

  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSEgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $13k · revenue +53%
  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $13k · revenue +50%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
2
Portersville Christian School

The mission of portersville christian school is to glorify god by preparing students to serve christ and instilling high standards spiritually, academically, socially, and physically. the school provides a high-quality academic program, a…

Education
3
More International Ministries

To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades

Religion
4
Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry Inc

To glorify god by equipping the church with proper christian doctrine and to help non-believers come to a saving knowledge of jesus christ.

—
5
Tri-State Christian Academy Inc

Our desire is to provide balanced, biblical direction to the child as a support to the home and to train each student to be self-disciplined and biblically directed in their walk with god and their fellow man. it is also our desire to meet…

Education
6
Faith School of Theology

Faith's purpose is to mentor students for spirit-filled leadership in ministry, in light of the great commission. while academics are important, the classrooms are not the only learning place. through a combination of formal instruction,…

—
7
California Prestige University

Presbyterian theological seminary in america exists to servce the korean presbyterian church abroad (kpca) and the kingdom of god by equipping students for effective service to god, his church, and the world he sends us to evangelize.

—
8
North America Bible Institute

North America Bible Institute (NABI) is an evangelical graduate school, made up of students who are diverse in both ethnicity and ministry aims -- but united in great love for Jesus and his gospel. As a graduate school, NABI offers them…

Education
9
Newman University Inc

We are a catholic university named for saint john henry newman and founded by the adorers of the blood of christ for the purpose of empowering graduates to transform society. our core values (see schedule o for continuation)

Education
10
Puritan Reformed Theological Seminary

To prepare students to serve christ and his church through biblical, experiential and practical ministry. prts provides theological training and instruction in accordance with the scriptures and the historic reformed creeds for promotion…

Education
11
International Christian Scholarship Fdtn
—
12
Christ Mission College

Cmc passionately develops a students god-given potential in a practical process of biblical higher education, discipleship, and practical experience for sacrificial service in the church and community to expand gods kingdom in the world…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Criswell College; the most unlike its peers is New Hope Compassion. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $43,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $39,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientYEO MYUNG SCHOOL: $7,200 · OtherINTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INC: $6,000 · OtherKOREAN BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY: $6,000 · OtherKOREA BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY AND SEMINARY: $5,000 · Other+19 more: $24,400 · Other+19 moreDALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $52,800 · EducationDALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITYSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $12,500 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS F…+3 more: $3,000 · EducationSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $13,000 · ReligionARM MINISTRIES: $4,000 · ReligionYUST PUST Foundation: $3,000 · Human ServicesSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $1,000 · Health
Other$140,800Education$68,300Religion$17,000Human Services$3,000Health$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $52,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $13,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYUST PUST Foundation: $3,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetCRISWELL COLLEGE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCovenant Knights School: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNew Hope Compassion: $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INC ↗
  • Who funds ARM MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds YUST PUST Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CRISWELL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds Covenant Knights School ↗
  • Who funds New Hope Compassion ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jura International funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jura International. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jura International’s filings →

More from the funding graph