Loading…
· Public charity
JUNIOR LEAGUE OF RENO INC
The junior league of reno, inc.
$114k
Granted FY2023
6
Grants
1
Communities
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0180% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2023.
Youth Development$50kEducation$43kHuman Services$31kHealth$23kRecreation & Sports$5kEmployment$2kOther$38k
02FY2023 · 6 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k3 grants · $16k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$949k
Total assets
Largest grants
- Boys & Girls Club of Truckee Meadow$50,000
- UNR Foundation$25,000
- Northern Nevada RAVE Family Fnd$10,000
- Women and Childrens Center$6,000
- Terry Lee Wells NV Discovery Museum$5,000
- Evoke Warriors$5,000
02The need
03
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY22–23, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
21%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$41k · 3 repeat orgs$150k to everyone else
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +82% since the first grant, against +34% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2023, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
3
9
Total granted
$41k
$70k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+82%
+34%
Still filing today
100%
78%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 21% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $80k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Human ServicesHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsEmploymentOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NNNorthern Nevada RAVE Family Foundat2× · 2022–2023 · $15k · revenue +82%
- TLTerry Lee Wells NV Discovery Museum2× · 2022–2023 · $15k · revenue +20%
- WAWomen and Childrens Center2× · 2022–2023 · $11k · revenue +296%
Funded once
- URUrban Rootsgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $18k · revenue +114%
- HCHEALTHCARE CENTERone grant, 2018 · $13k
- SESAFE EMBRACEgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $13k · revenue +26%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Healthy Nevada
Health
2
Nami Western Nevada
Nami western nv is dedicated to the improvement of the quality of life of individual, families, and communities impacted by mental illness, through education, advocacy, support and awareness.
Public Benefit
3
Nevadans for Equal Rights
Nevadans for Equal Rights was formed to support the passage of the Nevada Equal Rights Amendment in 2022.
—
4
Nevada Health Centers Inc
NVHC provides health services throughout the state of Nevada. Health services include OB/GYN, Pediatrics, Internal Medicine, and Primary medical care and dental care services. NVHC operates a mobile mammography clinic as well as mobile…
Health
5
Child Advocates of Nevada County
Child Advocates of Nevada County provides advocacy, education and prevention services to Nevada County's children to ensure they grow up free from abuse and neglect.
Crime & Legal
6
Nevadans for Reproductive Freedom
The organization was created to help enshrine reproductive freedom in the Nevada Constitution.
—
7
Nevada Casa Association Inc
The organization supports Nevada local CASA programs which recruit, train, retain and deploy volunteers to advocate for abused or neglected children.
Youth Development
8
Womens Resource Center in Durango
Womens Resource Center (WRC) in Durango connects women and girls to the resources and programming that will help them reach their full potential in all states of their life.
—
9
Community Services of Nevada
CSNV is engaged in comprehensive community development projects that promote neighborhood revitalization and economic development, community education and civic action, housing, development; cultural awareness, equity and
Housing & Shelter
10
Nevada Coalition to End Domestic and Sexual Violen
NCEDSV provides advocacy, education and support of the front-line organizations that help those impacted by domestic and sexual assault and work towards the elimination of domestic and sexual violence against all persons.
Human Services
11
Central Valley Gender Health & Wellness
Civil Rights
12
Cancer Council of Reno County Inc
Provide services and education to individuals and families of reno county affected by cancer
Health
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northern Nevada Rave Family Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Boys and Girls Club of Truckee Meadows. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network
13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
12/13
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Youth Development$50,000Education$42,500Other$38,425Human Services$31,200Health$22,945Recreation & Sports$5,000Employment$1,600
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Boys & Girls Club of Truckee Meadow ↗
- Who funds UNR Foundation ↗
- Who funds Urban Roots ↗
- Who funds Northern Nevada RAVE Family Foundat ↗
- Who funds Terry Lee Wells NV Discovery Museum ↗
- Who funds SAFE EMBRACE ↗
- Who funds Women and Childrens Center ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN NEVADA HOPES ↗
- Who funds Evoke Warriors ↗
- Who funds Karma Box Project ↗
- Who funds Center for Adaptive Riding ↗
- Who funds Tru-Vista Foundation ↗
- Who funds Dress for Success ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Community Foundation of Northern NevadaNV22.3× affinity8 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Northern Nevada · Renown Health · Dermody Properties Foundation · The Nell J Redfield Foundation · John Ben Snow Memorial Tr Uw #839158 · NV Energy Charitable Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation JUNIOR LEAGUE OF RENO INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Evoke Warriors.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
medium risk
3 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +74% since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 861724859 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on Evoke Warriors, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 16% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Junior League of Reno Inc?
Find your warmest path to Junior League of Reno Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines