Skip to content
Junior League of Hartford Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Junior League of Hartford Inc

The junior league of hartford, inc.

$18k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$65kYouth Development$45kHousing & Shelter$27kHuman Services$18kCrime & Legal$9k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$9,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$751k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JOURNEY HOME$9,000
COMMUNITY PARTNERS IN ACTION$9,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

None of its grants could be placed against low income need for this view.

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
3/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTHWEST NEW ENGLAND INC: $65,000 · InternationalJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTHWEST NEW ENGLAND …THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF HARTFORD: $45,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF HAR…JOURNEY HOME INC: $27,000 · Human ServicesJOURNEY HOME INCTHE DIAPER BANK OF CONNECTICUT INC: $18,000 · OtherTHE DIAPER BANK OF…COMMUNITY PARTNERS IN ACTION INC: $9,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY PARTNERS…
International$65,000Youth Development$45,000Human Services$27,000Other$27,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTHWEST NEW ENGLAND INC: $65,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetTHE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF HARTFORD: $45,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJOURNEY HOME INC: $27,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DIAPER BANK OF CONNECTICUT INC: $18,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS IN ACTION INC: $9,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hartford Foundation f…American Savings Foun…Liberty Bank Foundati…Aetna Foundation IncThe Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Hartford Foundation for Public GivingCT15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hartford Foundation for Public Giving · American Savings Foundation Inc · Liberty Bank Foundation Inc · Aetna Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Junior League of Hartford Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Junior League of Hartford Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 71%
  • Community Partners in Action Inc: 95% of income from government
  • Journey Home Inc: 71% of income from government
  • The Diaper Bank of Connecticut Inc: 54% of income from government
  • The Boys and Girls Clubs of Hartford: 24% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 5 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Junior League of Hartford’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home