· Public charity
Junior League of Gainesville -
The junior league of gainesville-hall county is an organization of women whose mission is to advance womens leadership for meaningful community impact through volunteer action, collaboration, and training.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 49% of JUNIOR LEAGUE OF GAINESVILLE -’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 1 grants below total $32,488 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $56,978 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $24,490 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GAINESVILLE JAYCEES | $32,488 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +96% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GJGAINESVILLE JAYCEES CHARITIES INC5× · 2017–2025 · $78k · revenue +96% · 33% of their budget
- RCROTARY CLUB OF GAINESVILLE2× · 2023–2024 · $60k · revenue -21%
- GNGOOD NEWS CLINICS INC2× · 2018–2019 · $41k · revenue +103%
Funded once
- SHSOUTH HALL ROTARY CLUBone grant, 2022 · $43k
- RGROCK GOODBYE ANGEL INCone grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue -33% · 33% of their budget
- HFHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF HALL COUNTY INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $16k · revenue +38%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To lead, support, and coordinate citizens and professionals in an effort to provide a central location using a multidisciplinary team approach to coordinate the evaluation, intervention, prosecution and treatment for children (and their…
To provide ambulance servies for hall county
We provide exceptional mental health and developmental services to individuals of all ages, couples, and famlies.
Operate recovery (drugs/alcohol) home
To educate Gainesville families on health diet and lifestyle and specialize in assisting "on the spectrum" families with therapy services for children that include physical occupational & speech therapy
Restoring our youth by turning trauma into triumph for female suvivors of child sex trafficking in Georgia.
Child abuse & neglect prevention
Great oaks is committed to serving the emotional and relational needs of the gallatin valley by providing clinically excellent individual, marriage and family therapy.
Emergency foster care for abused and neglected children in pickens, dawson, and surrounding counties.
Provide Group and Foster care for Homeless Children and Counseling
The mission of the christian health clinic of howard county is to provide medical services, including dentistry and pharmacy, to the people of the county who cannot obtain medical care because of inability to pay.
Community mental health center
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Gateway House Inc and the most unlike its peers is Northeast Georgia Speech Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GAINESVILLE JAYCEES CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds ROTARY CLUB OF GAINESVILLE ↗
- Who funds GOOD NEWS CLINICS INC ↗
- Who funds ROCK GOODBYE ANGEL INC ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF HALL COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds GATEWAY HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S CENTER FOR HOPE & HEALING ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF HALL COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST GEORGIA SPEECH CENTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Northeast Georgia Health System Inc · North Georgia Community Foundation Inc · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Junior League of Gainesville - funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.