Skip to content

· Private foundation

Juliet Rosenthal Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$735k
Granted FY2023
19
Grants FY2023
5
States reached
$200k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

98% of Juliet Rosenthal Foundation Inc’s FY2024 grant dollars went to National Philanthropic Trust, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year Juliet Rosenthal Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 10 organizations, $735k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

10
’19
10
’20
11
’21
12
’22
10
’23
1
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Health$2.1MPhilanthropy$1.5MEducation$1.1MInternational$150kCivil Rights$34kArts & Culture$30kRecreation & Sports$21kFood & Nutrition$19kOther$0
02FY2023 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k10 grants · $45k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $65k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $625k
$9,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HORACE MANN SCHOOL - NURSERY DIVISION$200,000
NEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL$175,000
MEMORIAL SLOUN KETTERING CANCER CENTER$125,000
CARDIOLOGY ASSOCIATES FOUNDATION$75,000
UJA FEDERATION OF NY$50,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$30,000
CARDIOVASCULAR INSTITUTE OF MT SINAI$15,000
COUNSELING IN SCHOOLS$10,000
SEE INTERNATIONAL$10,000
ANTI DEFAMATION LEAGUE$9,000
COLORECTAL CANCER ALLIANCE$7,500
CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY$6,000
FRIENDS SELECT SCHOOL$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
LI ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 70% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $1.3M → 7%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $45k → 14%POWERHOUSE ARTS: $25k → 20%BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER: $36k → 13%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $30k → 13%UROLOGIC ONCOLOGIC RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $45k → 6%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $18k → 14%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $23k → 13%FUTURE FORWARD OF HAITI INC: $25k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $15k → 14%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $23k → 13%FUTURE FORWARD OF HAITI INC: $25k → 7%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $23k → 13%FUTURE FORWARD OF HAITI INC: $25k → 7%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $23k → 13%FUTURE FORWARD OF HAITI INC: $25k → 7%UJA FEDERATION OF NY: $50k → 17%UJA FEDERATION OF NY: $50k → 17%UJA FEDERATION OF NY: $50k → 17%UJA FEDERATION OF NY: $50k → 17%UJA FEDERATION OF NY: $50k → 17%FOUNDATION FOR MEDICAL EVALUATION: $20k → 17%FOUNDATION FOR MEDICAL EVALUATION: $20k → 17%FOUNDATION FOR MEDICAL EVALUATION: $20k → 17%FOUNDATION FOR MEDICAL EVALUATION: $20k → 17%NEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL: $175k → 17%NEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL: $175k → 17%NEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL: $160k → 17%NEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL: $150k → 17%MEMORIAL SLOUN KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $125k → 17%MEMORIAL SLOUN KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $100k → 17%MEMORIAL SLOUN KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $100k → 17%NEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL: $100k → 17%CARDIOLOGY ASSOCIATES FOUNDATION: $90k → 17%CARDIOLOGY ASSOCIATES FOUNDATION: $75k → 17%MEMORIAL SLOUN KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $75k → 17%MEMORIAL SLOUN KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $75k → 17%CARDIOLOGY ASSOCIATES FOUNDATION: $75k → 17%CARDIOLOGY ASSOCIATES FOUNDATION: $60k → 17%CARDIOLOGY ASSOCIATES FOUNDATION: $50k → 17%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $40k → 17%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $20k → 17%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $20k → 17%HORACE MANN SCHOOL - NURSERY DIVISION: $200k → 17%HORACE MANN SCHOOL - NURSERY DIVISION: $200k → 17%HORACE MANN SCHOOL - NURSERY DIVISION: $200k → 17%HORACE MANN SCHOOL - NURSERY DIVISION: $180k → 17%HORACE MANN SCHOOL - NURSERY DIVISION: $160k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
PA
NJ
CT
CA
VA
MD
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.5M · 23 repeat orgs$129k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2023, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
5

Total granted

$3.5M
$99k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+91%

Still filing today

48%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthInternationalEducationPhilanthropyCivil RightsRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $250k · revenue +27%
  • NY
    New York University
    3× · 2019–2021 · $80k · revenue +51%
  • CI
    COUNSELING IN SCHOOLS INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $50k · revenue +64%

Funded once

  • UO
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGIC RESEARCH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $45k
  • BM
    BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $36k
  • CR
    CURE RARE DISEASE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +91%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
2
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
3
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
4
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
5
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
6
The New York and Presbyterian Hospital

To be a leader in the provision of world class patient care, teaching, research, and service to local, state, national, and international communities. newyork-presbyterian hospital is one of the nation's most comprehensive, integrated…

Health
7
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
8
The Graduate Center Foundation Inc

The graduate center foundation is committed to promoting and safe-guarding the success of the graduate center by raising funds and managing and investing donations for use by the graduate center. the board of trustees of the foundation…

—
9
Nyu Langone Hospitals

The board adopted mission statement is: nyu langone hospitals (the "hospital") will operate with new york university's medical schools a health system ("nyu langone health") devoted to excellence in patient care, education and research. in…

Health
10
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
11
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
12
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Philanthropic Trust; the most unlike its peers is Cardiology Foundation of New York. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HORACE MANN SCHOOL - NURSERY DIVISION: $940,000 · OtherHORACE MANN SCHOOL - NURSERY DIVISIONNEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL: $760,000 · OtherNEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITALMEMORIAL SLOUN KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $475,000 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOUN KETTERING CANCER CENTER+16 more: $353,728 · Other+16 moreNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $1,270,000 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUSTUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $250,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF…CARDIOLOGY FOUNDATION OF NEW YORK: $350,000 · HealthCARDIOLOGY F…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $122,000 · HealthAMERICAN CAN…COUNSELING IN SCHOOLS INC: $50,000 · HealthCOUNSELING I…COLORECTAL CANCER ALLIANCE: $22,500 · Health+1 more: $10,000 · HealthUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $90,000 · EducationNew York University: $80,000 · Education+1 more: $5,000 · EducationFUTURE FORWARD FOR HAITI INC: $100,000 · InternationalSURGICAL EYE EXPEDITIONS INTERNATIONAL INC: $45,000 · InternationalANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $34,000 · Civil RightsPOWERHOUSE ARTS INC: $25,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$2,528,728Philanthropy$1,520,000Health$554,500Education$175,000International$145,000Civil Rights$34,000Arts & Culture$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $1,270,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARDIOLOGY FOUNDATION OF NEW YORK: $350,000 over 5y, 100% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $250,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $122,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFUTURE FORWARD FOR HAITI INC: $100,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $90,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University: $80,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOUNSELING IN SCHOOLS INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSURGICAL EYE EXPEDITIONS INTERNATIONAL INC: $45,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $34,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPOWERHOUSE ARTS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOLORECTAL CANCER ALLIANCE: $22,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $21,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $19,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCURE RARE DISEASE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
  • Who funds CARDIOLOGY FOUNDATION OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds FUTURE FORWARD FOR HAITI INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗
  • Who funds COUNSELING IN SCHOOLS INC ↗
  • Who funds SURGICAL EYE EXPEDITIONS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds POWERHOUSE ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds COLORECTAL CANCER ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds CURE RARE DISEASE INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS SELECT SCHOOL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA9.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Juliet Rosenthal Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Juliet Rosenthal Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Juliet Rosenthal Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Juliet Rosenthal Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Juliet Rosenthal’s filings →

    More from the funding graph