Skip to content

· Private foundation

Julie Handley Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$120k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$695kHuman Services$100kHealth$50kRecreation & Sports$37kYouth Development$10k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EASTSIDE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL$60,000
JUNIPERO SERRA HIGH SCHOOL$30,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
PENINSULA BRIDGE$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $110k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%BENEFICENT TECHNOLOGY INC: $10k → 8%KAINOS HOME AND TRAINING CENTER: $90k → 7%KAINOS HOME AND TRAINING CENTER: $10k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 11% of Julie Handley Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 89%.

Julie Handley Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$775k · 5 repeat orgs$117k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +124% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
6

Total granted

$775k
$117k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+124%
+17%

Still filing today

60%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EC
    EASTSIDE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $375k · revenue +124%
  • TP
    THE PENINSULA BRIDGE PROGRAM
    7× · 2019–2025 · $180k · revenue +117%
  • KH
    Kainos Home and Training Center for the Developmentally Disabled
    2× · 2017–2018 · $100k · revenue +129%

Funded once

  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HEALTH COUNCIL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +65%
  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR A COLLEGE EDUCATION
    one grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue +17%
  • AF
    All Fivegraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +51%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
High Tech High

High tech high's mission is to develop and support innovative public schools where all students develop the academic, workplace and citizenship skills for postsecondary success.

Education
2
Bridge California

Education

Education
3
Berkeley Community Scholars Dba Berkeley Community Fund

Berkeley Community Scholars empowers Berkeley youth who face racial, economic, and other barriers to achieving their college dreams by providing a unique experience of scholarships, advising, mentoring, and a community of support.

Philanthropy
4
Chartwell School

Chartwell School empowers bright students with language-based learning differences, including dyslexia. We do this in grades K-12 by offering them the knowledge, creativity, and skills in self advocacy and perseverance needed to thrive in…

Education
5
Elite Public Schools

To ensure students reach their fullest potential through access to learning spaces that honor and celebrate students' rich cultural heritage and challenge them with rigorous and relevant learning experiences designed to make them active…

Education
6
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
7
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
8
Partners in College Success

Partners in College Success (PiCS) ensures equal access to higher education and an equitable college experience for low-income, refugee, immigrant, foster, homeless and disadvantaged youth in San Diego County. PiCS provides dedicated,…

Education
9
Pacific Collegiate School

Pacific collegiate school's mission is to provide exemplary, standards based college preparatory and fine arts education for public middle and high school students of santa cruz county and bordering areas.

Education
10
Across the Bridge Foundation Dba Downtown College Preparatory

Dcp prepares first-generation students (first in their family to go to college) for college success. as such, dcp develops and manages college preparatory schools (grades 5-12) for students residing in and around san jose, california.

Education
11
Pacific Coast Academy

Provide a high standard of education to students through comprehensive curriculum supported by energetic, dynamic, and caring teachers.

Education
12
Nativity Prep Academy of San Diego Inc

Our mission is to provide a catholic, college prep, middle school education to students from low income families who will be the first in their families to graduate from college.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Health Council Inc; the most unlike its peers is El Cajon Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EASTSIDE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC: $375,000 · EducationEASTSIDE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL INCFOUNDATION FOR A COLLEGE EDUCATION: $30,000 · EducationFOUNDATION FOR A COLLEGE EDUCATIONAll Five: $15,000 · EducationTHE PENINSULA BRIDGE PROGRAM: $180,000 · OtherTHE PENINSULA BRIDGE PROGRAMJUNIPERO SERRA HIGH SCHOOL: $85,000 · OtherJUNIPERO SERRA HIGH SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $35,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+2 more: $12,000 · OtherKainos Home and Training Center for the Developmentally Disabled: $100,000 · Human ServicesKainos Home a…BENEFICENT TECHNOLOGY INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesBENEFICENT TE…CHILDREN'S HEALTH COUNCIL INC: $50,000 · Health
Education$420,000Other$312,000Human Services$110,000Health$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEASTSIDE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC: $375,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetTHE PENINSULA BRIDGE PROGRAM: $180,000 over 7y, 2.0% of budgetKainos Home and Training Center for the Developmentally Disabled: $100,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTH COUNCIL INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR A COLLEGE EDUCATION: $30,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetAll Five: $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBENEFICENT TECHNOLOGY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEl Cajon Project Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 21% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA9.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Julie Handley Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Julie Handley Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Julie Handley’s filings →

    More from the funding graph