Skip to content

· Private foundation

Judy's Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$10k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$125kPhilanthropy$30kReligion$30kFood & Nutrition$16kHealth$13kPublic Benefit$7kHuman Services$3kCrime & Legal$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$4,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$321k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF TX AUSTIN$5,000
ALL SAINTS PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$4,000
TEXSAR$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOSPICE AUSTIN: $100 → 10%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

46%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$108k · 12 repeat orgs$129k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +94% since the first grant, against +80% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
26

Total granted

$108k
$119k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+94%
+80%

Still filing today

58%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthFood & NutritionHuman ServicesInternationalReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ML
    MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC
    3× · 2017–2024 · $11k · revenue +320%
  • BH
    BILL HILLARY & CHELSEA CLINTON FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $7k · revenue +26%
  • CF
    Center for Public Policy Priorities
    3× · 2017–2019 · $5k · revenue +94%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF TX MOODY CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
  • MI
    Make It Movement Incgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +96%
  • TS
    THE SETON FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $17k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Civil Liberties Union of Texas Inc

The ACLU of Texas works with communities, at the State Capitol, and in the courts to protect and advance civil rights and civil liberties for every Texan, no exceptions.

—
2
Texas Association of Business

As the state chamber of commerce, tab is the most influential and dominant voice for public policy issues affecting business in texas. through proven results-oriented advocacy and member services, tab develops a climate in texas which…

—
3
Aclu Foundation of Texas Inc

The ACLU Foundation of Texas is the unyielding guardian and promoter of freedom, justice, equality and dignity of all people, particularly for those who are still fighting to secure the full exercise of their civil rights and liberties.…

Civil Rights
4
Texas 2036

Texas 2036 identifies and advances data-driven policies that will improve lives and expand opportunities for all Texans.

Public Benefit
5
Lone Star Justice Alliance

Lone star justice alliance (lsja) was established in 2017 as a non-profit legal organization to boldly address systemic failures in the justice system through advocacy and innovative evidence-based programs that improve life outcomes for…

Crime & Legal
6
Texas Public Radio

The mission of Texas Public Radio is to engage, inspire and inform, bringing people together to better understand their community and world.

Arts & Culture
7
Austin Area Research Organization

Aaro, a non-partisan thought leader for central texas, has worked behind the scenes on critical regional issues since 1980. the membership is an intentionally diverse group of central texas leaders drawn from business, industry, education,…

—
8
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
9
Texas Business Leadership Council

The texas business leadership council was created in 1994 as a non-partisan 501(c)(6) nonprofit corporation that provides public policy research and recommendations to our state's elected leadership. as texas' only statewide ceo based…

—
10
Committee to Protect Journalists Inc

The committee to protect journalists promotes press freedom worldwide and defends the right of journalists to report the news safely and without fear of reprisal. cpj ensures the free flow of news and commentary by taking action wherever…

Civil Rights
11
Community Information Now

Community information now (cinow) provides data, tools, analysis, and training to inform decisions to improve texas communities. cinow's vision is improved lives and decreased disparities through democratized data.

Community Improvement
12
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mobile Loaves & Fishes Inc; the most unlike its peers is Champions Off the Field. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
14/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF TX MOODY CENTER: $50,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TX MOODY CENTERUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN: $45,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTINST AUSTIN CATHOLIC PARISH: $23,866 · OtherST AUSTIN CATHOLIC PARISHTHE SETON FUND: $16,666 · OtherTHE SETON FUND+27 more: $44,295 · Other+27 moreMake It Movement Inc: $25,000 · EducationMake It Move…TEXAS TRIBUNE INC: $2,000 · EducationTEXAS TRIBUN…MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC: $11,200 · ReligionBILL HILLARY & CHELSEA CLINTON FOUNDATION: $6,500 · Health+1 more: $50 · HealthCenter for Public Policy Priorities: $5,426 · Public BenefitCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $2,600 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS AND MORE INC: $2,100 · Food & NutritionTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesHOSPICE AUSTIN: $100 · Human Services
Other$179,827Education$27,000Religion$11,200Health$6,550Public Benefit$5,426Food & Nutrition$4,700Human Services$2,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMake It Movement Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC: $11,200 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBILL HILLARY & CHELSEA CLINTON FOUNDATION: $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCenter for Public Policy Priorities: $5,426 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPHILANTHROPITCH: $3,670 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $2,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS AND MORE INC: $2,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS TRIBUNE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARITAS OF AUSTIN: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $175 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE AUSTIN: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOVEMBER FOUNDATION: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Make It Movement Inc ↗
  • Who funds MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC ↗
  • Who funds BILL HILLARY & CHELSEA CLINTON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Center for Public Policy Priorities ↗
  • Who funds PHILANTHROPITCH ↗
  • Who funds Central Texas Food Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS AND MORE INC ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS TRIBUNE INC ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds CARITAS OF AUSTIN ↗
  • Who funds Champions Off the Field ↗
  • Who funds TEXSAR INC ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE AUSTIN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Austin Community Foundation IncTX17.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Austin Community Foundation Inc · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Judy's Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Judy's Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Judy's Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Judy's Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Judy's’ filings →

More from the funding graph