Skip to content
Judges and Lawyers Breast Cancer Alert Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Judges and Lawyers Breast Cancer Alert Inc

To leverage the legal community's strength, passion, resources and expertise to promote awareness, early detection, treatment and support for all those affected by breast cancer; and to porvide programs that educate members of the profession.

$700k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$230k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$2.8MCrime & Legal$1.4MHuman Services$1.1MSocial Science$70k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $80k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $620k
$100,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Family Center$230,000
Center for Elder Law and Just$100,000
ECMC Foundation Inc$100,000
Mount Sinai Hospital$100,000
American Italian Cancer Found$90,000
National Breast Cancer Coalit$30,000
NY City Bar Association$30,000
Self Help for Women$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $1.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%The Family Center: $230k → 20%THE FAMILY CENTER - MAITE AQUINO PROGRAM: $135k → 20%THE FAMILY CENTER - MAITE AQUINO PROGRAM: $135k → 20%THE FAMILY CENTER - JUDGE JUDITH KAYE PROJECT: $115k → 20%THE FAMILY CENTER - JUDGE JUDITH KAYE PROJECT: $115k → 20%THE FAMILY CENTER - JUDGE JUDITH KAYE PROJECT: $110k → 20%THE FAMILY CENTER - MAITE AQUINO PROGRAM: $110k → 20%THE FAMILY CENTER - MAITE AQUINO PROGRAM: $100k → 20%THE FAMILY CENTER - MAITE AQUINO PROGRAM: $100k → 20%THE FAMILY CENTER - JUDITH S KAYE PROJECT: $100k → 20%THE FAMILY CENTER - JUDITH S KAYE PROJECT: $100k → 20%THE FAMILY CENTER - MAITE AQUINO PROGRAM: $95k → 20%THE FAMILY CENTER - JUDGE JUDITH KAYE PROJECT: $95k → 20%THE FAMILY CENTER - JUDGE JUDITH KAYE PROJECT: $90k → 20%THE FAMILY CENTER - MAITE AQUINO PROGRAM: $90k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.2M · 10 repeat orgs$270k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +55% since the first grant, against -21% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
1

Total granted

$5.2M
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
-21%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $220k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthCrime & LegalHuman ServicesSocial ScienceHousing & ShelterEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE FAMILY CENTER INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $1.7M · revenue +14%
  • PR
    PROJECT RENEWAL INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $1.0M · revenue +58%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR ELDER LAW & JUSTICE INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $854k · revenue +93%

Funded once

  • YOUNG SURVIVAL COALITION INC
    one grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue -21%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
2
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
New York Blood Center Inc

As one of the most preeminent and comprehensive blood centers in theworld, nybc operates under a four-part mission. for more information,see sch. o and part iii, 4a-c.

Health
4
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Long Island Community Hospital At Nyu Langone Health

The goals and objectives of the corporation are as follows:(a) to operate and maintain a nonsectarian, general hospital at one or more locations for the furnishing of inpatient, ambulatory, restorative, preventative and emergency medical…

—
6
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Nyu Langone Hospitals

The board adopted mission statement is: nyu langone hospitals (the "hospital") will operate with new york university's medical schools a health system ("nyu langone health") devoted to excellence in patient care, education and research. in…

Health
11
Nyu Langone Health System

The board adopted mission statement is: the corporation is operated exclusively for the benefit of nyu langone hospitals and its affiliated organizations. in this capacity, the corporation, may, in order to improve the health and welfare…

Health
12
Legal Action Center of the City of New York Inc

The legal action center (lac) uses legal policy strategies to fight discrimination, build health equity, and restore opportunity for people with arrest and conviction records, substance use disorders, and hiv or aids.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ecmc Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Continuum Health Partners Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE FAMILY CENTER INC: $1,720,000 · Human ServicesTHE FAMILY CENTER INCPROJECT RENEWAL INC: $1,039,000 · HealthPROJECT RENEWAL INCECMC FOUNDATION INC: $300,000 · HealthECMC FOUNDATION INCCONTINUUM HEALTH PARTNERS INC: $100,000 · HealthCONTINUUM HEALTH PARTNERS INCAMERICAN-ITALIAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $90,000 · HealthAMERICAN-ITALIAN CANCER FOUNDATIONSHARE SELF-HELP FOR WOMEN WITH BREAST OR OVARIAN CANCER INC: $90,000 · HealthSHARE SELF-HELP FOR WOMEN WITH BRE…+1 more: $50,000 · HealthCENTER FOR ELDER LAW & JUSTICE INC: $854,000 · Crime & LegalCENTER FOR ELDER LA…MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL LEGAL PARTNERSHIP INC: $65,000 · Crime & LegalMOUNT SINAI MEDICAL…ASSOCIATION OF THE BAR OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK FUND INC: $409,000 · Social ScienceLEGAL SERVICES OF THE HUDSON VALLEY: $280,000 · OtherASSOCIATION OF THE BAR OF THE CITY OF NY: $30,000 · OtherNATIONAL BREAST CANCER COALITION FUND: $300,000 · Housing & ShelterECMC FOUNDATION: $110,000 · Education
Human Services$1,720,000Health$1,669,000Crime & Legal$919,000Social Science$409,000Other$310,000Housing & Shelter$300,000Education$110,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE FAMILY CENTER INC: $1,720,000 over 8y, 3.9% of budgetPROJECT RENEWAL INC: $1,039,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetCENTER FOR ELDER LAW & JUSTICE INC: $854,000 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetASSOCIATION OF THE BAR OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK FUND INC: $409,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetNATIONAL BREAST CANCER COALITION FUND: $300,000 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetECMC FOUNDATION INC: $300,000 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetLEGAL SERVICES OF THE HUDSON VALLEY: $280,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetECMC FOUNDATION: $110,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN-ITALIAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $90,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetSHARE SELF-HELP FOR WOMEN WITH BREAST OR OVARIAN CANCER INC: $90,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetMOUNT SINAI MEDICAL LEGAL PARTNERSHIP INC: $65,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetYOUNG SURVIVAL COALITION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetASSOCIATION OF THE BAR OF THE CITY OF NY: $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The New York Bar Foun…Mother Cabrini Health…Jewish Communal FundJpmorgan Chase Founda…National Philanthropi…The Pfizer Foundation…American Endowment Fo…Network for GoodThe Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …
The New York Bar FoundationNY13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The New York Bar Foundation · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Judges and Lawyers Breast Cancer Alert Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Judges and Lawyers Breast Cancer Alert Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Judges and Lawyers Breast Cancer Alert’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home