Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jt Tai & Co Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
53
Grants FY2024still arriving
12
States reached
$717k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$15MHealth$11MCivil Rights$2.1MInternational$1.9MArts & Culture$1.3MCrime & Legal$1.1MYouth Development$900kHuman Services$730kOther$0
02FY2024 · 53 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $145k
  • $50k–250k40 grants · $3.9M
  • $250k+6 grants · $2.9M
$100,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$124M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PEKING UNIVERSITY EDUCATION FOUNDAT$716,700
FRIENDS OF SOOCHOW UNIVERSITY$700,000
Children's Hospital Colorado$500,000
UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA FOUNDATION$500,000
EISENHOWER FELLOWSHIPS$250,000
APEX FOR YOUTH$250,000
ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE -$200,000
Committee of 100 Inc$150,000
HUNTINGTON LIBRARY ART MUSEUM BOTAN$150,000
THE 1990 INSTITUTE$150,000
THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY-NANJIN$150,000
Individual grant recipient$150,000
ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$150,000
FORDHAM UNIVERSITY$100,000
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF PHYS$100,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $130k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $40k → 13%SELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $30k → 13%SELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $20k → 13%SELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $20k → 13%SELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $20k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
NY
MA
PA
NJ
RI
CA
CO
MD
AZ
DC
LA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$35M · 58 repeat orgs$221k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

58 repeat relationships: 50 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

58
3

Total granted

$35M
$111k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+4%

Still filing today

45%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $110k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthInternationalArts & CulturePhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF SOOCHOW UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $3.5M · revenue +59% · 84% of their budget
  • CH
    Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2.5M · revenue +26%
  • ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2.1M · revenue +93%

Funded once

  • AD
    AMERICAN DIABETES ASSN RESEARCH FDN
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
  • SJ
    ST JOHN'S UNIVERSITY NEW YORK
    one grant, 2020 · $8k · revenue +4%
  • CC
    COUNTY COLLEGE OF MORRIS
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
Shanghai Jiao Tong University Foundation of America (Sjtufa)
Education
4
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
5
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
6
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
7
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
10
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
University of California Irvine Foundation

The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…

Education
12
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The 1990 Institute; the most unlike its peers is Friends of Soochow University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
22/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PEKING UNIVERSITY EDUCATION FOUNDAT: $3,302,700 · OtherPEKING UNIVERSITY EDUCATION FOUNDATASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE -: $1,100,000 · OtherASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE -THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY-NANJIN: $700,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSS OF GREATER NEW Y: $700,000 · OtherHUNTINGTON LIBRARY ART MUSEUM BOTAN: $625,000 · OtherWOMANKIND: $600,000 · Other+33 more: $9,781,163 · Other+33 moreFRIENDS OF SOOCHOW UNIVERSITY: $3,500,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF SOOCHOW UNIVERS…ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $2,150,000 · EducationARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY F…University of Arizona Foundation: $1,350,000 · EducationUniversity of Arizona Foun…GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $500,000 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITYFordham University: $500,000 · EducationFordham University+3 more: $287,500 · EducationChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation: $2,550,000 · HealthChildren's Ho…BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $500,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER …AMERICAN SKIN ASSOCIATION INC: $340,000 · HealthAMERICAN SKIN…RESEARCH TO PREVENT BLINDNESS INC: $250,000 · HealthRESEARCH TO P…NEWYORK-PRESBYTERIANQUEENS: $250,000 · HealthNEWYORK-PRESB…CHARLES B WANG COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $200,000 · HealthEisenhower Exchange Fellowships Incorporated: $1,250,000 · InternationalTHE 1990 INSTITUTE: $800,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $540,000 · International+1 more: $70,000 · InternationalCOMMITTEE OF 100 INC: $700,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF CHINESE IN AMERICA: $560,000 · Arts & CultureCHINESE CENTER ON LONG ISLAND INC: $150,000 · Arts & CultureAPEX FOR YOUTH INC: $900,000 · Community ImprovementFU-JEN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $500,000 · PhilanthropyCHINATOWN HEALTH CLINIC FOUNDATION INC: $300,000 · PhilanthropySELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $130,000 · Human Services
Other$16,808,863Education$8,287,500Health$4,090,000International$2,660,000Arts & Culture$1,410,000Community Improvement$900,000Philanthropy$800,000Human Services$130,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRIENDS OF SOOCHOW UNIVERSITY: $3,500,000 over 5y, 84% of budgetChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation: $2,550,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $2,150,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetUniversity of Arizona Foundation: $1,350,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetEisenhower Exchange Fellowships Incorporated: $1,250,000 over 5y, 5.7% of budgetAPEX FOR YOUTH INC: $900,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetTHE 1990 INSTITUTE: $800,000 over 5y, 79% of budgetCOMMITTEE OF 100 INC: $700,000 over 5y, 6.8% of budgetMUSEUM OF CHINESE IN AMERICA: $560,000 over 5y, 5.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $540,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $500,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $500,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $500,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFU-JEN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $500,000 over 5y, 7.6% of budgetFordham University: $500,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MARFAN FOUNDATION INC: $350,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetAMERICAN SKIN ASSOCIATION INC: $340,000 over 5y, 5.0% of budgetCHINATOWN HEALTH CLINIC FOUNDATION INC: $300,000 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetRESEARCH TO PREVENT BLINDNESS INC: $250,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetNEWYORK-PRESBYTERIANQUEENS: $250,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNYCPM OF TOURO UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $250,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCHARLES B WANG COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $200,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHINESE CENTER ON LONG ISLAND INC: $150,000 over 5y, 31% of budgetSELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $130,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBEAUTY OF SHARING FOUNDATION: $70,000 over 5y, 100% of budgetMORINGA FOR LOVE: $30,000 over 3y, 6.4% of budgetST JOHN'S UNIVERSITY NEW YORK: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRIENDS OF SOOCHOW UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds University of Arizona Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Eisenhower Exchange Fellowships Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds APEX FOR YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE 1990 INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds COMMITTEE OF 100 INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF CHINESE IN AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds FU-JEN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Fordham University ↗
  • Who funds THE MARFAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN SKIN ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHINATOWN HEALTH CLINIC FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Cathay Bank FoundationCA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Cathay Bank Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jt Tai & Co Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jt Tai & Co Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jt Tai &’s filings →

More from the funding graph