Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Jsl Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$53k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222025.

Animals$303kHealth$25kArts & Culture$10kHousing & Shelter$500
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $50k
$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LOVING ALL ANIMALS$20,000
CITY DOGS & CITY KITTIES RESCUE$20,000
FRIENDS OF THE PALM SPRINGS ANIMAL SHELTER$10,000
PILOTS TO THE RESCUE$3,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 59% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ALMOST THERE A MOM PUPS RESCUE: $15k → 11%FRIENDS OF THE PALM SPRINGS ANIMAL SHELTER: $10k → 11%PILOTS TO THE RESCUE: $3k → 20%CITY DOGS & CITY KITTIES RESCUE: $20k → 14%DYNAMITE HILL-SMITHFIELD COMMUNITY LAND TRUST: $500 → 16%SPINAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $25k → 6%ANIMAL RESCUE NEW ORLEANS INC: $18k → 15%ZEUS' RESCUES INC: $8k → 23%HEIDIS VILLAGE ANIMAL WELFARE ORGANIZATION: $15k → 11%LOVING ALL ANIMALS: $20k → 11%THE SATO PROJECT INC: $25k → 20%CITY DOGS RESCUE INC: $25k → 14%TAKE PAWS RESCUE: $35k → 23%ANIMALS BENEFIT CLUB OF ARIZONA INC: $30k → 11%THE SATO PROJECT INC: $15k → 20%WASHINGTON HUMANE SOCIETY: $35k → 14%HELPING ANIMALS LIVE ON INC: $15k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
CA
VA
AZ
NC
DC
LA
AL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Raskels Rescue
Animals
2
Pet Rescue Miami Inc
Animals
3
The Animal Rescue League
Animals
4
St Clouds Rescue
Animals
5
Runaways Animal Rescue
Animals
6
Animal Rescuers Without Borders

Battling against the overpopulation of homeless pets and improving the lives of companion animals through rescue, fostering programs, adoption, pet care, educational programs and of course spaying and neutering.

Animals
7
Donna's Love Pet Rescue
Animals
8
Pet Rescue Alliance Inc

Rescue animals from shelter

Animals
9
Anas Safe Haven Rescue Inc

Animal Welfare

Animals
10
Pats Pets Corporation

Animal rescue

Animals
11
Realtors to the Rescue

Animal Rescue

12
Paws Animal Rescue Center

To help rescue unwanted pets

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is City Dogs Rescue Inc and the most unlike its peers is Spinal Research Foundation D/B/a National Spine Health Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
1/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CITY DOGS RESCUE INC — $45,000 · AnimalsCITY DOGS RESCUE INCTHE SATO PROJECT — $40,000 · AnimalsTHE SATO PROJECTTAKE PAWS RESCUE — $35,000 · AnimalsTAKE PAWS RESCUEWASHINGTON HUMANE SOCIETY — $35,000 · AnimalsWASHINGTON HUMANE SOCIETYAnimals Benefit Club of Arizona Inc — $30,000 · AnimalsAnimals Benefit Club of Arizona IncANIMAL RESCUE NEW ORLEANS INC — $17,500 · AnimalsANIMAL RESCUE NEW ORLEANS INCHALO HELPING ANIMALS LIVE ON INC — $15,000 · AnimalsHALO HELPING ANIMALS LIVE ON INCALMOST THERE A MOM PUPS RESCUE — $15,000 · AnimalsALMOST THERE A MOM PUPS RESCUEFriends of the Palm SpringsAnimal Shelter — $10,000 · Animals+1 more — $7,500 · AnimalsHEIDIS VILLAGE ANIMAL WELFARE ORGANIZATION — $15,000 · OtherHEIDIS VILLAGE…BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE BANFF CENTRE — $10,000 · OtherBOARD OF GOVER…EL FARO DE LOS ANIMALES INC — $7,500 · OtherEL FARO DE LOS…ZEUS' RESCUES INC — $7,500 · OtherZEUS' RESCUES …PILOTS TO THE RESCUE — $3,000 · OtherPILOTS TO THE …+1 more — $500 · OtherSPINAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION D/B/A NATIONAL SPINE HEALTH FOUNDATION — $25,000 · HealthLOVING ALL ANIMALS INC — $20,000 · Philanthropy
Animals$250,000Other$43,500Health$25,000Philanthropy$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCITY DOGS RESCUE INC — $45,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetTHE SATO PROJECT — $40,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTAKE PAWS RESCUE — $35,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetWASHINGTON HUMANE SOCIETY — $35,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAnimals Benefit Club of Arizona Inc — $30,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetSPINAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION D/B/A NATIONAL SPINE HEALTH FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetLOVING ALL ANIMALS INC — $20,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetANIMAL RESCUE NEW ORLEANS INC — $17,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetHALO HELPING ANIMALS LIVE ON INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetALMOST THERE A MOM PUPS RESCUE — $15,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetFriends of the Palm SpringsAnimal Shelter — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetZEUS' RESCUES INC — $7,500 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetWINGS OF RESCUE INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Good CharitiesWA13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Good Charities · Synchrony Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jsl Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Jsl Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Jsl Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph