Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jsj Family Foundation

Its FY2018 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$17k
Granted FY2017
26
Grants FY2017
7
States reached
$3k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

61% of Jsj Family Foundation’s FY2018 grant dollars went to Schwab Charitable Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2018 names 6 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2017, the last year Jsj Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 9 organizations, $17k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

9
’17
6
’18

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.

Philanthropy$22kHealth$8kArts & Culture$3kScience & Tech$2kCivil Rights$2kHuman Services$1kCommunity Improvement$500Recreation & Sports$250Other$0
02FY2017 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
7
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$3,150
JEWISH UNITED FUND$2,000
HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN$1,500
UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MUSEUM$1,000
CHARLES M SCHWARTZ MEM FOUNDATION$1,000
CRADLES TO CRAYONS$1,000
NATIONAL PARKINSON FOUNDATION$1,000
JEWISH UNITED FUND$1,000
LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$1,000
PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK$500
JEWISH COUNCIL ON URBAN AFFAIRS$500
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCATION$500
CHILDREN'S BRITTLE BONE FOUNDATION$500
JEWISH UNITED FUND$365
JEWISH UNITED FUND$365
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $1k → 14%COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $225 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
MI
NY
PA
CA
MD
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

51%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$14k · 7 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2017, 0 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2017 (too recent to call). Read against FY2017, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
20

Total granted

$14k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+38%

Still filing today

29%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyCivil RightsCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JU
    JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
    2× · 2017–2018 · $6k · revenue +13%
  • US
    UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MUSEUM
    2× · 2017–2018 · $3k
  • LC
    LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
    2× · 2017–2018 · $2k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • HR
    HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN INC
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +20%
  • CT
    CRADLES TO CRAYONS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +202%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Loyola University of Chicago

We are chicago's jesuit, catholic university - a diverse community seeking god in all things and working to expand knowledge in the service of humanity through learning, justice, and faith.

Education
2
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
3
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
4
Chicago Psychoanalytic Institute

The chicago psychoanalytic institute transforms the lives of individuals, families and communities, using psychoanalytic knowledge to help them grow and thrive.

Social Science
5
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
6
University of Chicago

The mission of the university of chicago has been to sustain at the highest level of excellence, the communication of knowledge, the creation of knowledge and the fostering of a dynamic community of scholars and students.

Education
7
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
8
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
9
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
10
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
11
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
12
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc; the most unlike its peers is Rory David Deutsch Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
13/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $15,018 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INCJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $5,930 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGOIndividual grant recipient: $3,150 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MUSEUM: $2,500 · OtherUNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MUSEUMLURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $2,225 · OtherLURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITALCHARLES M SCHWARTZ MEM FOUNDATION: $2,000 · OtherCHARLES M SCHWARTZ MEM FOUNDATIONNATIONAL PARKINSON FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · OtherNATIONAL PARKINSON FOUNDATION INCNATIONAL PARKINSON FOUNDATION: $1,000 · OtherNATIONAL PARKINSON FOUNDATIONALZHEIMER'S ASSOCATION: $608 · Other+12 more: $3,294 · Other+12 moreRORY DAVID DEUTSCH FOUNDATION: $1,000 · HealthPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $500 · HealthCANCER WELLNESS CENTER: $225 · HealthHUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN INC: $1,500 · Civil RightsCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesCOUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $225 · Human ServicesJewish Council on Urban Affairs: $500 · Community ImprovementChicago Children's Museum: $350 · Arts & Culture
Philanthropy$20,948Other$15,777Health$1,725Civil Rights$1,500Human Services$1,225Community Improvement$500Arts & Culture$350

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $15,018 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $5,930 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRORY DAVID DEUTSCH FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetJewish Council on Urban Affairs: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Children's Museum: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBEBER CAMP PROPERTY INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Family Institute: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $225 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER WELLNESS CENTER: $225 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Brain Tumor Association: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA9.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jsj Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jsj Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jsj Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph