Skip to content

· Private foundation

JS Pannullo Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$26k
Granted FY2023
17
Grants FY2023
7
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Religion$57kPhilanthropy$29kInternational$26kFood & Nutrition$22kEducation$12kHousing & Shelter$9kPublic Safety & Disaster$8kHuman Services$5kOther$0
02FY2023 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$377k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Salesien Missions$1,500
St Labre Indian School$1,500
ICMC International Catholica Migrat$1,500
St Joseph Indian School$1,500
Boys Town$1,500
Catholic Medical Mission Board$1,500
Franciscan Bread for the Poor$1,500
Catholic Bishops of Northern Alaska$1,500
St Bonaventure Mission$1,500
Maryknoll Fathers and Brothers$1,500
Oblater Sisters of St Francis$1,500
Maryknoll Sisters$1,500
Covenant House$1,500
St Francis Friends of the Poor$1,500
Food Bank for NYC$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 48% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 12%Boys Town: $2k → 12%Boystown: $1k → 12%Boystown: $1k → 12%Boys Town: $500 → 12%Boys Town: $500 → 12%Covenant House: $2k → 17%Covenant House: $1k → 17%Covenant House: $1k → 17%Covenant House: $300 → 17%Covenant House: $300 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
WA
MT
MI
NY
SD
CT
NE
VA
MD
NM
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$129k · 24 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +35% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2023, 12 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
14

Total granted

$129k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+35%

Still filing today

21%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’21’22’23
HealthHuman ServicesInternationalCommunity ImprovementAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    ST FRANCIS FRIENDS OF THE POOR INC
    5× · 2018–2023 · $5k · revenue +83%
  • FF
    Father Flanagan's Boys' Home
    5× · 2018–2023 · $5k · revenue +43%
  • CH
    COVENANT HOUSE
    5× · 2018–2023 · $4k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • MK
    Mary Knoll Father and Brother
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
  • ORGANIZATION FOR AUTISM RESEARCHgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +35%
  • KC
    Kings County American Legion
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FRANCISCAN BREAD FOR THE POOR INC: $17,500 · OtherFRANCISCAN BREAD FOR THE POOR INCMARYKNOLL SISTERS OF ST DOMINIC INC: $12,250 · OtherMARYKNOLL SISTERS OF ST DOMINIC INCSALESIAN MISSIONS INC: $10,400 · OtherSALESIAN MISSIONS INCPlan International Foundation: $8,436 · OtherPlan International FoundationCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $7,700 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICESMaryknoll Lay Missioners: $7,250 · OtherMaryknoll Lay MissionersST JOSEPHS INDIAN SCHOOL: $6,700 · OtherST JOSEPHS INDIAN SCHOOLMary Knoll Fathers Brothers: $6,500 · OtherMary Knoll Fathers BrothersST LABRE INDIAN SCHOOL: $5,500 · OtherSt Bonaventure Mission: $5,500 · Other+26 more: $28,250 · Other+26 moreCATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC: $11,200 · InternationalFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $4,500 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE: $4,100 · Human ServicesST FRANCIS FRIENDS OF THE POOR INC: $5,000 · HealthORGANIZATION FOR AUTISM RESEARCH: $1,000 · HealthFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $4,100 · Community ImprovementTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $250 · Animals
Other$115,986International$11,200Human Services$8,600Health$6,000Community Improvement$4,100Animals$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC: $11,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetST FRANCIS FRIENDS OF THE POOR INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $4,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $4,100 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $4,100 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetORGANIZATION FOR AUTISM RESEARCH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC ↗
  • Who funds ST FRANCIS FRIENDS OF THE POOR INC ↗
  • Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY ↗
  • Who funds ORGANIZATION FOR AUTISM RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA9.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization JS Pannullo Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from JS Pannullo Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $28k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on JS Pannullo’s filings →

    More from the funding graph