Skip to content

California · Private foundation

Jp Peng & Ashley Chao Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$56k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
10
Grants FY2025
10
Organizations funded FY2024
20%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$5,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$15,000
Organizations funded a year
4 to 10
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$310k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 20% of the organizations Jp Peng & Ashley Chao Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 10% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationPhilanthropyFood & NutritionAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving10$56k30%
FY202410$51k20%
FY20239$42k22%
FY20224$21k0%
FY20219$41k56%
FY20205$20k80%
FY20195$20k40%
FY20184$15k50%
87% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$88kPhilanthropy$81kHealth$35kFood & Nutrition$32kArts & Culture$22kAnimals$8kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 13 grantees

Plus 12 recipients with no EIN on record ($102k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Jp Peng & Ashley Chao Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Shs Foundation: $31,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetJohns Hopkins University: $29,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of California San Francisco Foundation: $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSaratoga Education Foundation: $22,050 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetSan Francisco Food Bank: $18,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSecond Harvest of Silicon Valley: $13,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSaratoga High School Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetSaratoga Music Boosters: $9,949 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetHumane Society Silicon Valley: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSan Francisco Museum of Modern Art: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSaratoga Mset Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetFriends of the Saratoga Libraries: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGofundmeorg: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 13.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bright Funds FoundationCA13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bright Funds Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Jp Peng & Ashley Chao Foundation with peer funders

About Jp Peng & Ashley Chao Foundation

How much does Jp Peng & Ashley Chao Foundation give?
Jp Peng & Ashley Chao Foundation reported 10 grants totaling $56,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 4 and 10 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Jp Peng & Ashley Chao Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Education (31%), Philanthropy (29%), Health (12%).
Who are Jp Peng & Ashley Chao Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: The Shs Foundation ($31k), Johns Hopkins University ($30k), University of California San Francisco Foundation ($25k).
Does Jp Peng & Ashley Chao Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 20% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Jp Peng & Ashley Chao Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Jp Peng & Ashley Chao Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Bright Funds Foundation, American Online Giving Foundation Inc, Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc.
Where is Jp Peng & Ashley Chao Foundation based?
Jp Peng & Ashley Chao Foundation is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jp Peng & Ashley Chao’s filings →

More from the funding graph