Skip to content

· Private foundation

Joy M & James Grodnick Charitable Founda Tion

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$247k
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$315kRecreation & Sports$161kPhilanthropy$124kHealth$54kYouth Development$41kReligion$28kCommunity Improvement$20kArts & Culture$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k22 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $110k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$1,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UMS WRIGHT PREP SCHOOL$100,000
AIEF$25,000
CRIMSON TIDE FOUNDATION$25,000
SCHWAB CHARITABLE- DONOR-ADVISED-MERYL & MATTHEW FISHMAN$20,000
SCHWAB CARITABLE DONOR-ADVISED FUND-ABBY & CLIFF KENNEDY$20,000
SCHWAB CHARIABLE DONOR-ADVISED - LEAH & SAM OTHER$20,000
USA HEALTH$6,000
DIST YOUNG WOMEN OF AMERICA FOUNDATION$5,500
MITCHELL CANCER INSTITUTE$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA$3,500
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$1,500
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$1,500
DRUG EDUCATIONAL COUNCIL$1,500
IMPACT 100 MOBILE$1,100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%FRIENDS OF MUNICIPAL PARK: $10k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
CT
CO
NE
KY
DC
LA
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$705k · 39 repeat orgs$44k to everyone else

39 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
31

Total granted

$705k
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+10%

Still filing today

31%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyArts & CultureHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DE
    Drug Education Council Inc
    5× · 2021–2025 · $7k · revenue +23%
  • IM
    IMPACT100 MOBILE
    4× · 2022–2025 · $4k · revenue +26%
  • TC
    THE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $3k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF MUNICIPAL PARK
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • MA
    MOBILE AREA CHAMBER-SHELBY POINTE
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • SS
    SPECIAL SPECTATORS INC
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mobile United Inc

To present a forum for business and citizens where an exchange of ideas can occur that will make Mobile a better place to live, work and do business.

Community Improvement
2
Mobile Area Council Inc Boy Scouts of America

To promote scouting in the south alabama area

Youth Development
3
Mobile Baykeeper Inc

Provide citizens a means to protect the beauty, health and heritage of the Mobile Bay Watershed, Alabamas waterways and coastal communities.

Environment
4
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Mobile Inc

The Organization was formed to build, own and operate a Ronald McDonald House in Mobile, Alabama. The facility provides overnight lodging for children and their parents who travel long distances to Mobile area hospitals for various…

Human Services
5
Mobile Area Chamber of Commerce

Community and economic development

—
6
Medical Society of Mobile County Inc

None

—
7
Nami Alabama Inc

Encourage and enhance advocacy and family support services on behalf of individuals suffering from mental illness.

Health
8
Legal Aid Society of Birmingham

The Organization is a nonprofit community defender providing legal assistance through court appointment to children and other indigent persons.

Crime & Legal
9
Mobile Area Association of Realtors Inc

The association is the professional real estate trade association in the mobile, alabama area. it was created to promote the local real estate industry and encourage high standards of conduct among real estate professionals.

—
10
Family Counseling Center of Mobile Inc

The Center operates in Southwest Alabama providing counseling and guidance to individuals, families, and groups experiencing problems related to stress, family discord, parenting, phobias, aging, rape, and financial difficulties.

Human Services
11
Mobile Bar Association

To elevate the legal profession to the highest possible standards, regulate its practice, and provide continuing legal education to its members.

—
12
Montgomery Cancer Wellness Foundation

To provide supportive services, educational services, and assistance to cancer patients throughout central alabama, including those patients who lack the resources

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community of Mobile Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Palmer Williams Group Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/33
Grantees still filing
24/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CRIMSON TIDE FOUNDATION: $150,000 · OtherCRIMSON TIDE FOUNDATIONAIEF: $150,000 · OtherAIEFUMS WRIGHT PREP SCHOOL: $117,500 · OtherUMS WRIGHT PREP SCHOOLUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA: $41,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMASCHWAB CHARIABLE DONOR-ADVISED - LEAH & SAM OTHER: $40,000 · OtherSCHWAB CHARIABLE DONOR-ADVISED - LEAH & SAM OTHERSCHWAB CARITABLE DONOR-ADVISED FUND-ABBY & CLIFF KENNEDY: $40,000 · OtherSCHWAB CARITABLE DONOR-ADVISED FUND-ABBY & CLIFF KENNEDYDIST YOUNG WOMEN OF AMERICA FOUNDATION: $33,250 · Other+51 more: $135,700 · Other+51 moreDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $40,000 · PhilanthropyIMPACT100 MOBILE: $4,400 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF SOUTHWEST ALABAMA INC: $3,500 · Philanthropy+2 more: $650 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF MUNICIPAL PARK: $10,000 · Human ServicesFUSE PROJECT: $2,000 · Human ServicesAdoption Rocks Inc: $1,500 · Human ServicesOur Sisters Closet Inc: $500 · Human ServicesTHE VILLAGE OF SPRING HILL INC: $9,000 · Community ImprovementCOUNTRY CLUB ESTATES NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION INC: $1,100 · Community Improvement+1 more: $200 · Community ImprovementMOBILE MUSEUM OF ART INC: $2,000 · Arts & CultureMobile Symphony Inc: $1,000 · Arts & CultureMobile Arts Council Inc: $500 · Arts & CultureGREENWICH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC: $2,000 · EducationTHE ISIDORE NEWMAN SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $1,000 · EducationCOMMUNITY OF MOBILE INC: $2,500 · Environment
Other$707,450Philanthropy$48,550Human Services$14,000Community Improvement$10,300Arts & Culture$3,500Education$3,000Environment$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF MUNICIPAL PARK: $10,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetTHE VILLAGE OF SPRING HILL INC: $9,000 over 5y, 3.2% of budgetDrug Education Council Inc: $7,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetIMPACT100 MOBILE: $4,400 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SOUTHWEST ALABAMA INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $3,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetMOBILE BALLET INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY OF MOBILE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFUSE PROJECT: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetRETT SYNDROME RESEARCH TRUST INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMOBILE MUSEUM OF ART INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGREENWICH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAdoption Rocks Inc: $1,500 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetMobile Symphony Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAAGALIM INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFIRST LIGHT COMMUNITY OF MOBILE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ISIDORE NEWMAN SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMcKemie Place Inc: $600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSenior Citizens Services Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBACO BOYS FUND INC: $500 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetMobile Arts Council Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER ATLANTA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGIA INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOur Sisters Closet Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMOBILE ARTS & SPORTS ASSOCIATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH INSTITUTE FOR NATIONAL SECURITY OF AMERICA: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PALMER WILLIAMS GROUP INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Junior League of Mobile AL Inc: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRALLY FOUNDATION INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF MUNICIPAL PARK ↗
  • Who funds THE VILLAGE OF SPRING HILL INC ↗
  • Who funds Drug Education Council Inc ↗
  • Who funds IMPACT100 MOBILE ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWEST ALABAMA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MOBILE BALLET INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY OF MOBILE INC ↗
  • Who funds FUSE PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds RETT SYNDROME RESEARCH TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds MOBILE MUSEUM OF ART INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENWICH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mayer & Arlene Mitchell Charitable FoundationAL39× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mayer & Arlene Mitchell Charitable Foundation · Crampton Trust #1255000731 Regions Bank Trustee · J L Bedsole Foundation Regions Bank Co-Trustee · Alabama Power Foundation Inc · The Ben May Charitable Trust Hancock Whitney Bank Successor Trustee · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Lisa Mitchell Charitable Foundation · Cd Helen and Jeff Glaze Foundation · As Mitchell Foundation Inc · Hearin - Chandler Foundation · The Ee Delaney Foundation Inc · Dog Hill Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Joy M & James Grodnick Charitable Founda Tion funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Joy M & James Grodnick Charitable Founda Tion. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Joy M & James Grodnick Charitable Founda Tion?

    Find your warmest path to Joy M & James Grodnick Charitable Founda Tion through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 76 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Joy M & James Grodnick Charitable Founda Tion’s filings →

    More from the funding graph