Skip to content

· Public charity

Journey Home Inc

Journey home's mission is to ensure a home for all.

$5.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$787k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$16MYouth Development$128kEmployment$108kCrime & Legal$80kCommunity Improvement$8k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $4,268,891, the rows itemized in this filing. The $5,363,964 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,095,073 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $589k
  • $250k+7 grants · $3.7M
$285,640
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MERCY HOUSING & SHELTER$786,809
FRIENDSHIP SERVICE CENTER$767,374
HANDS ON HARTFORD$634,497
ST VINCENT DEPAUL MISSION OF BRISTOL INC$572,684
CONNECTICUT HARM REDUCTION ALLIANCE INC$335,752
COMMUNITY RENEWAL TEAM INC$285,640
CORNERSTONE FOUNDATION INC$285,492
THE SALVATION ARMY SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND DIVISION$201,583
KEYS TO THE GATE COMMUNITY VILLAGE$168,197
CENTER CHURCH HARTFORD$135,291
SOUTH PARK INN$84,398
IMMACARE INC$11,174
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

None of its grants could be placed against low income need for this view.

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$15M · 17 repeat orgs$826k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +36% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
13

Total granted

$15M
$523k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+36%

Still filing today

82%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $303k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Housing & ShelterHuman ServicesCrime & LegalHealthReligionEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FS
    Friendship Service Center Inc
    5× · 2021–2025 · $2.9M · revenue +67%
  • MH
    MERCY HOUSING & SHELTER CORPORATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $2.6M · revenue +76%
  • CR
    COMMUNITY RENEWAL TEAM INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $1.8M · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • PC
    PRUDENCE CRANDALL CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $102k · revenue +36%
  • GH
    GREATER HARTFORD LEGAL AID INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $80k · revenue +46%
  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY MARSHALL HOUSE
    one grant, 2021 · $76k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Connecticut Housing Coalition Inc

The connecticut housing coalition works to expand housing opportunity and to increase the quantity and quality of affordable housing available to people with low and moderate incomes in connecticut through advocacy, education and…

—
2
Community Residences Inc

Housing and programs for persons with intellectual disabilities.

Human Services
3
Community Health Services Inc

To provide medical services for the residents of the greater hartford connecticut area. to provide quality health care services to low and moderate income individuals in the greater hartford connecticut area regardless of ability to pay.

Health
4
Hartford HealthCare at Home Inc

The mission of the agency is to provide and safeguard quality home health care to all persons in need, especially the indigent and medically underserved population. The agency strongly believes that appropriate health care is a fundamental…

Health
5
Eastern Connecticut Housing Opportunities Inc

Eastern connecticut housing opportunities, inc. is a non-profit organization organized to provide affordable housing to low-income families of southeastern connecticut.

Housing & Shelter
6
Helping Hands Outreach Ministries Inc

Transitional and permanent supportive housing - provides shelter in the greater Manchester NH area. Services include housing, counseling (including substance abuse counseling), job search assistance, etc.

Housing & Shelter
7
Mental Health Connecticut Inc

Mhc partners with individuals, their families, and surrounding communities to create environments that support long-term health and wellness.

Health
8
The Community Action Agency of Western Connecticut Inc

The community action agency of western connecticut is a private non-profit corporation serving western connecticut. its primary purpose is to operate a multi-purpose organization to combat poverty and promote self sufficiency among low…

Community Improvement
9
Transition House Inc

Transition house is a human services agency dedicated to preventing and ending domestic violence. the agency provides a continuum of housing resources and holistic support for survivors of violence and their children, as well as prevention…

—
10
Hartford Catholic Worker Inc

The mission of Hartford Catholic Worker is to practice the works of mercy. We do this through our work with children and families in our neighborhood, helping to make sure the hungry are fed and helping secure housing for the homeless.

International
11
Connecticut Humane Society

The connecticut humane society is the leading resource in the state for companion animal welfare, enriching the lives of families and communities through adoption services, medical care, education, and prevention of cruelty.

Animals
12
Connecticut Counseling Centers Inc

To provide substance abuse and mental health treatment services. programs include methadone maintenance, outpatient, hiv, detoxification and dually diagnosed treatments and counseling.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hands On Hartford Inc; the most unlike its peers is Reinstitute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
20/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Friendship Service Center Inc: $2,920,379 · Housing & ShelterFriendship Service Center IncMERCY HOUSING & SHELTER CORPORATION: $2,554,160 · Housing & ShelterMERCY HOUSING & SHELTER CORPORATIONSt Vincent DePaul Mission of Bristol Inc: $1,260,784 · Housing & ShelterSt Vincent DePaul Mission of Bristol IncSOUTH PARK INN INC: $1,124,061 · Housing & ShelterSOUTH PARK INN INC+3 more: $286,152 · Housing & ShelterCOMMUNITY RENEWAL TEAM INC: $1,793,311 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY RENEWAL TEAM INCHANDS ON HARTFORD INC: $1,691,528 · Human ServicesHANDS ON HARTFORD INCCONNECTICUT HARM REDUCTION ALLIANCE INC: $852,298 · Human ServicesCONNECTICUT HARM REDUCTION ALLIA…HUMAN RESOURCES AGENCY OF NEW BRITAIN INC: $158,567 · Human Services+1 more: $101,817 · Human ServicesCORNERSTONE FOUNDATION INC: $1,274,456 · OtherCORNERSTONE FOUNDATION…THE SALVATION ARMY: $1,247,858 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYKEYS TO THE GATE COMMUNITY VILLAGE: $168,197 · OtherFIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST IN HARTFORD: $135,291 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $110,178 · Other+11 more: $333,218 · Other+11 moreGREATER HARTFORD LEGAL AID INC: $80,000 · Crime & LegalMANCHESTER AREA CONFERENCE OF CHURCHES INC: $67,360 · Youth DevelopmentCOMMUNITY HEALTH RESOURCES INC: $48,400 · HealthCONNECTICUT CENTER FOR ADVANCED TEC: $45,045 · Employment
Housing & Shelter$8,145,536Human Services$4,597,521Other$3,269,198Crime & Legal$80,000Youth Development$67,360Health$48,400Employment$45,045

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFriendship Service Center Inc: $2,920,379 over 5y, 20% of budgetMERCY HOUSING & SHELTER CORPORATION: $2,554,160 over 5y, 8.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY RENEWAL TEAM INC: $1,793,311 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetHANDS ON HARTFORD INC: $1,691,528 over 6y, 6.8% of budgetCORNERSTONE FOUNDATION INC: $1,274,456 over 5y, 12% of budgetSt Vincent DePaul Mission of Bristol Inc: $1,260,784 over 5y, 29% of budgetSOUTH PARK INN INC: $1,124,061 over 5y, 11% of budgetCONNECTICUT HARM REDUCTION ALLIANCE INC: $852,298 over 5y, 9.4% of budgetTHE OPEN HEARTH ASSOCIATION: $193,170 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetHUMAN RESOURCES AGENCY OF NEW BRITAIN INC: $158,567 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetPRUDENCE CRANDALL CENTER INC: $101,817 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetGREATER HARTFORD LEGAL AID INC: $80,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetMANCHESTER AREA CONFERENCE OF CHURCHES INC: $67,360 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetYWCA HARTFORD REGION INC: $65,995 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetIMMACARE INC: $62,202 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH RESOURCES INC: $48,400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONNECTICUT CENTER FOR ADVANCED TEC: $45,045 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY HOUSING ADVOCATES INC: $30,780 over 1y, 47% of budgetHARTFORD INTERVAL HOUSE INC: $24,454 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetREINSTITUTE INC: $8,250 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHOUSE OF BREAD INC: $3,242 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hartford Foundation for Public GivingCT43.2× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hartford Foundation for Public Giving · Farmington Bank Community Foundation Inc · United Way Inc United Way of Cent & Ne Connecticut · Liberty Bank Foundation Inc · J Walton Bissell Foundation Inc · Aetna Foundation Inc · Sbm Charitable Foundation Inc · Ion Bank Foundation Inc · McDonald Family Trust · The Ahearn Family Foundation · American Savings Foundation Inc · Clsj Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Journey Home Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Journey Home Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 43%
  • Friendship Service Center Inc: 85% of income from government
  • Community Health Resources Inc: 79% of income from government
  • Human Resources Agency of New Britain Inc: 78% of income from government
  • Community Renewal Team Inc: 77% of income from government
  • Mercy Housing & Shelter Corporation: 77% of income from government
  • The Open Hearth Association: 59% of income from government
  • Immacare Inc: 52% of income from government
  • Connecticut Harm Reduction Alliance Inc: 43% of income from government
  • Connecticut Center for Advanced Tec: 40% of income from government
  • St Vincent DePaul Mission of Bristol Inc: 31% of income from government
  • Prudence Crandall Center Inc: 30% of income from government
  • South Park Inn Inc: 29% of income from government
  • Hands On Hartford Inc: 20% of income from government
  • Ywca Hartford Region Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Reinstitute Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
7rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Journey Home’s filings →

More from the funding graph