Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Josephine County Educational Fund Inc dba Redwood Foundation for Education

Redwood Foundation for Education works with individuals, families, organizations and businesses to build a better future for Southern Oregon students, schools and community.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 50% of Josephine County Educational Fund Inc dba Redwood Foundation for Education’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 8 grants below total $166,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,099,458 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $932,958 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $117k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Grants Pass School District #7$50,000
Academic Masters$24,000
Southern Oregon ESD$20,000
Siskiyou Community Health$20,000
Family Nuturing Center$20,000
Healthy U$12,500
Illinois Valley Family Coalition$10,000
Sugarloaf Community Association$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%Healthy U: $13k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$567k · 9 repeat orgs$65k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +115% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
3

Total granted

$567k
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+115%
+11%

Still filing today

67%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
EducationCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    THE FAMILY NURTURING CENTER ROGUE VALLEY CHILDREN'S RELIEF NURSERY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $181k · revenue +115%
  • SC
    SISKIYOU COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $176k · revenue +75%
  • SC
    SUGARLOAF COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2021–2024 · $30k · revenue +383%

Funded once

  • YM
    YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOC - GRANTS PASS co EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +11%
  • GP
    GP PROJECT GRADUATION
    one grant, 2023 · $12k
  • TP
    Tinkerbell Parent Co-Op Preschool
    one grant, 2020 · $6k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Young Roots Oregon

The mission of young roots oregon is to creatively help young families build healthy foundations. our multi-generational vision is to give pregnant and parenting adolescents through age 24 and their children equitable opportunities for…

2
Young Mens Christian Assoc Medford dba Rv Family Ymca

The YMCA of Medford is a charitable, community service organization that includes men, women, and children of all ages, abilities, incomes, races and religions. Our mission is to put Christian principles into practice through programs that…

Human Services
3
Fergus Falls Community Child Care Center Inc

Children's corner is a full day child care center that gives each child a warm environment that encourages the development of socialization skills, independence, and a positive self-image.

Human Services
4
Young Men's Christian Association of the Inland Northwest

The mission of the YMCA of the Inland Northwest is to put Christian Principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all. The YMCA of the Inland Northwest is a diverse organization of men, women and…

5
Cuyama Valley Family Resource Center

The specific purpose of this coporation is to further the common welfare of the residents of the cuyama valley by providing recreation, education and public awareness opportunities to the families and youth of the valley and resources for…

Human Services
6
Rural Idaho & Mountain West Primary Care
Health
7
Malheur County Child Development Center

Head start & other children services

Education
8
Treasure Valley Children's Relief Nurser

The organization's mission is to prevent child abuse and neglect by strengthening at-risk families using proven interventions. Using the relief nursery model TVCRN signficantly reduces the likelihood of child maltreatment by reducing the…

Human Services
9
Active Community Health Center of Broward Inc

We are and Agency created on the fundamental value that strengthening one family at a time will transform our community as a whole. we believe that all people should have access to behavioral healt servicesa and to live a fulfilling life.…

10
Community Child Care Center

To promote each child's development by providing high quality early childhood education.

11
The Young Mens Christian Association of the Chippewa Valley

Our mission is to build strong kids, strong families, and strong communities. The YMCA of the Chippewa Valley is a community centered association dedicated to building a healthy spirit, mind and body for all people, while maintaining an…

Human Services
12
Childrens Family Center

Provides family oriented child care for children by promoting physical, emotional, and social development. Fosters intergenerational linkages between children and senior citizens for their mutual benefit

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Healthy U and the most unlike its peers is Academic Masters Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SISKIYOU COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC — $176,438 · OtherSISKIYOU COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INCGrants Pass School District 7 — $51,250 · OtherGrants Pass School District 7Southern Oregon ESD — $20,000 · OtherSouthern Oregon ESDCommunity Bridges Foundation — $16,800 · OtherYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOC - GRANTS PASS co EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR — $14,500 · OtherThree Rivers School District — $12,931 · OtherGP PROJECT GRADUATION — $12,432 · Other+2 more — $13,800 · OtherTHE FAMILY NURTURING CENTER ROGUE VALLEY CHILDREN'S RELIEF NURSERY — $181,122 · EducationTHE FAMILY NURTURING CENTER ROGUE VALLEY CHI…Academic Masters Foundation — $65,000 · EducationAcademic Masters FoundationSUGARLOAF COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION — $30,000 · Community ImprovementILLINOIS VALLEY FAMILY COALITION — $26,000 · Housing & ShelterHEALTHY U — $12,500 · Human Services
Other$318,151Education$246,122Community Improvement$30,000Housing & Shelter$26,000Human Services$12,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE FAMILY NURTURING CENTER ROGUE VALLEY CHILDREN'S RELIEF NURSERY — $181,122 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetSISKIYOU COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC — $176,438 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetAcademic Masters Foundation — $65,000 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetSUGARLOAF COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION — $30,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetILLINOIS VALLEY FAMILY COALITION — $26,000 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetCommunity Bridges Foundation — $16,800 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOC - GRANTS PASS co EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR — $14,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHEALTHY U — $12,500 over 1y, 6.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Four Way Community FoundationOR24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Four Way Community Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · The Carpenter Foundation · The Ford Family Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Josephine County Educational Fund Inc dba Redwood Foundation for Education funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 38%
  • Sugarloaf Community Association67% of income from government
  • Illinois Valley Family Coalition40% of income from government
  • The Family Nurturing Center Rogue Valley Children's Relief Nursery38% of income from government
  • Siskiyou Community Health Center Inc15% of income from government
  • Healthy U0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Josephine County Educational Fund Inc dba Redwood Foundation for Education?

Find your warmest path to Josephine County Educational Fund Inc dba Redwood Foundation for Education through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph