Skip to content

· Private foundation

Joseph P Kennedy Jr Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$672k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$570k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Public Benefit$4.1MHealth$793kInternational$469kCivil Rights$210kCommunity Improvement$125kEducation$100kScience & Tech$40k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k1 grant · $103k
  • $250k+1 grant · $570k
$569,900
Median grant
2
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DISABILITY RIGHTS FUND$569,900
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNCILS ON DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES$102,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $133k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY CENTERS DISABILITIES: $100k → 8%ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY CENTERS DISABILITIES: $33k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of Joseph P Kennedy Jr Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 13% of the giving stays in DC; by stated purpose, 6%.

Joseph P Kennedy Jr Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 19% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

30%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 4 repeat orgs$4.5M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
5

Total granted

$2.0M
$4.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+1%

Still filing today

100%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalArts & CultureHealthEducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DR
    DISABILITY RIGHTS FUND INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +35%
  • NA
    NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNCILS ON DEVE
    6× · 2019–2025 · $763k · revenue +43%
  • UO
    University of Kentucky Research Foundation
    3× · 2019–2022 · $40k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • EM
    EDWARD M KENNEDY INSTITUTE FOR THE UNITED STATES SENATE INC
    one grant, 2019 · $4.0M · revenue +1% · 47% of their budget
  • ID
    INTERNATIONAL DISABILITY ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2019 · $210k
  • MI
    MASSCHALLENGE INC
    one grant, 2021 · $125k · revenue -40%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
National Association of Corporate Directors New England Chapter Inc

The organization promotes high professional standards and provides governance education to boards of directors and senior corporate management.

Philanthropy
4
National Association of Corporate Directors

We empower directors and transform boards to be future ready.

Public Benefit
5
National Association for College Admission Counseling

Empowering college admission counseling professionals through education, advocacy, and community.

Education
6
Orcid Inc

Orcid provides an identifier for individuals to use with their name as they engage in research, scholarship, and innovation activities. we provide open tools that enable transparent and trustworthy connections between researchers, their…

Education
7
Us Digital Response

U.s. digital response is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that helps governments, nonprofits, and public entities respond quickly to critical public needs. the organization serves the public by leveraging a network of pro bono…

Public Safety & Disaster
8
The New England Council Inc

To foster growth of the competitive enterprise system of business in new england; to develop and maintain comprehensive views of new england conditions and problems; to secure recognition of the commonality of economic interest specific to…

—
9
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
10
National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners

Founded in 1889, the national association of regulatory utility commisioners (naruc) is a non-profit organization dedicated to representing the state public service commisions who regulate the utilities that provide essential services such…

—
11
Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

—
12
Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation Inc

Massachusetts taxpayers foundation provides public & private sector decision makers with accurate, timely, unbiased research & constructive solutions that drive public policy in order to strengthen the state's finances & position the…

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Association of Councils On; the most unlike its peers is Association of University Centers On Disabilities. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EDWARD M KENNEDY INSTITUTE FOR THE UNITED STATES SENATE INC: $4,000,000 · Arts & CultureEDWARD M KENNEDY INSTITUTE FOR THE UNITED STATES SENATE INCDISABILITY RIGHTS FUND INC: $1,038,600 · InternationalDISABILITY RIGHTS F…BUILDING TOMORROW INC: $100,000 · InternationalBUILDING TOMORROW I…NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNCILS ON DEVE: $762,500 · HealthNATIONAL ASSO…INTERNATIONAL DISABILITY ALLIANCE: $210,000 · OtherNEW AMERICA FOUNDATION: $102,500 · OtherASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY CENTERS ON DISABILITIES: $133,333 · Human ServicesMASSCHALLENGE INC: $125,000 · Community ImprovementUniversity of Kentucky Research Foundation: $40,000 · Education
Arts & Culture$4,000,000International$1,138,600Health$762,500Other$312,500Human Services$133,333Community Improvement$125,000Education$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEDWARD M KENNEDY INSTITUTE FOR THE UNITED STATES SENATE INC: $4,000,000 over 1y, 47% of budgetDISABILITY RIGHTS FUND INC: $1,038,600 over 5y, 4.3% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNCILS ON DEVE: $762,500 over 6y, 16% of budgetASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY CENTERS ON DISABILITIES: $133,333 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetMASSCHALLENGE INC: $125,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetNEW AMERICA FOUNDATION: $102,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBUILDING TOMORROW INC: $100,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetUniversity of Kentucky Research Foundation: $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Joseph P Kennedy Jr Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Joseph P Kennedy Jr Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Association of University Centers On Disabilities: 34% of income from government
  • Disability Rights Fund Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Masschallenge Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Joseph P Kennedy Jr Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Joseph P Kennedy Jr Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Joseph P Kennedy Jr’s filings →

More from the funding graph