Skip to content

· Private foundation

Joseph M Wright Char Found Inc

Its FY2018 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.8M
Granted FY2018
24
Grants FY2018
1
States reached
$1.6M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.

Religion$1.7MCommunity Improvement$36kEducation$34kCrime & Legal$22kArts & Culture$18kHuman Services$16kRecreation & Sports$12kAnimals$12kOther$0
02FY2018 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k18 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $85k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $110k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.6M
$2,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BAILEY ENDOWMENT INC$1,553,807
BAILEY ENDOWMENT INC$109,641
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH$30,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
CLEVELAND COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE$20,000
GWU SCHOOL OF DIVINITY$10,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CLEVELAND COUN$5,000
SALVATION ARMY$5,000
ASSOC FOR WELFARE OF ANIMALS$4,000
PENLAND SCHOOL OF CRAFTS$3,000
CLEVELAND COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL$3,000
EMPTY STOCKING FUND$2,500
BAILEY ENDOWMENT INC$2,451
CHILDREN'S HOME OF CLEVELAND COUNTY$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%JUNIOR CHARITY LEAGUE OF SHELBY: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

10%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$181k · 18 repeat orgs$1.7M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +16% since the first grant, against -36% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
7

Total granted

$181k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
-36%

Still filing today

44%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 6% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.7M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesAnimalsReligionCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PS
    Penland School Of Craft
    2× · 2017–2018 · $6k · revenue +28%
  • CC
    Cleveland County Arts Council Inc
    2× · 2017–2018 · $6k · revenue +16%
  • NC
    NORTH CAROLINA SYMPHONY SOCIETY INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $4k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • GW
    GWU WOMEN'S ATHLETIC PROGRAM
    one grant, 2017 · $12k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • GC
    GRACE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -36%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Creekside Christian Academy

Childcare/education services

Education
2
Brown County Christian Academy

Proividing a classical christian academy for school-age children for the youth of brown county and surrounding counties

Education
3
Conway Christian School

Quality education from a biblical perspective.

Education
4
North Raleigh Christian Academy Inc

Nrca is a community christian school assisting families in providing excellence in academics, fine arts, and athletics while instilling biblical principles in students' lives that they might impact their society for christ.

Education
5
The Childrens Christian Academy

To provide christian education for students

Education
6
Hope for Cleveland's Children
—
7
Greater Chattanooga Christian Services Inc

Provide Group and Foster care for Homeless Children and Counseling

Human Services
8
Covenant Christian Academy

Operation of a non-profit school

Education
9
Cca Foundation Inc
Education
10
Christ Covenant School

Provide a christian education to children

Education
11
The Childrens Advocacy Center of Cleveland County

To coordinate a collaborative, multi-disciplinary approach to child abuse cases. To provide private forensic interviews and medical exams in a child-friendly environment.

Crime & Legal
12
Crossroads Christian Academy Inc

Educational

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grace Christian Academy; the most unlike its peers is Brothers in Christ Outreach Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BAILEY ENDOWMENT INC: $1,666,996 · OtherBAILEY ENDOWMENT INC+16 more: $191,500 · Other+16 morePenland School Of Craft: $6,000 · Arts & CultureNORTH CAROLINA SYMPHONY SOCIETY INC: $4,000 · Arts & CultureGRACE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $5,000 · EducationCOMMUNITY MATH ACADEMY INC: $4,000 · EducationASSOCIATION FOR THE WELFARE OF ANIMALS: $7,500 · AnimalsChildrens Homes of Cleveland County Inc: $4,000 · Human ServicesJUNIOR CHARITY LEAGUE OF SHELBY INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesBROTHERS IN CHRIST OUTREACH MINISTRIES INC: $4,000 · ReligionCROSSROADS RESCUE MISSION: $2,000 · Crime & LegalCLEVELAND-RUTHERFORD KIDNEY ASSOCIATION: $1,000 · Health
Other$1,858,496Arts & Culture$10,000Education$9,000Animals$7,500Human Services$6,000Religion$4,000Crime & Legal$2,000Health$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBAILEY ENDOWMENT INC: $1,666,996 over 1y, 90% of budgetPenland School Of Craft: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCleveland County Arts Council Inc: $5,500 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA SYMPHONY SOCIETY INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChildrens Homes of Cleveland County Inc: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCROSSROADS RESCUE MISSION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJUNIOR CHARITY LEAGUE OF SHELBY INC: $2,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCLEVELAND-RUTHERFORD KIDNEY ASSOCIATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BAILEY ENDOWMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION FOR THE WELFARE OF ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds Penland School Of Craft ↗
  • Who funds Cleveland County Arts Council Inc ↗
  • Who funds GRACE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds BROTHERS IN CHRIST OUTREACH MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH CAROLINA SYMPHONY SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds Childrens Homes of Cleveland County Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY MATH ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROADS RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR CHARITY LEAGUE OF SHELBY INC ↗
  • Who funds CLEVELAND-RUTHERFORD KIDNEY ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dover Foundation IncNC17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dover Foundation Inc · Bailey Endowment Inc · The Paul and Margaret Porter Charitable Foundation · Albemarle Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Joseph M Wright Char Found Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Joseph M Wright Char Found Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Joseph M Wright Char Found Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Joseph M Wright Char Found Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Joseph M Wright Char Found’s filings →

    More from the funding graph