· Private foundation
Joseph M Wright Char Found Inc
Its FY2018 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2018.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2018
- Under $10k18 grants · $40k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $85k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $110k
- $250k+1 grant · $1.6M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BAILEY ENDOWMENT INC | $1,553,807 |
| BAILEY ENDOWMENT INC | $109,641 |
| FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH | $30,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $25,000 |
| CLEVELAND COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE | $20,000 |
| GWU SCHOOL OF DIVINITY | $10,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CLEVELAND COUN | $5,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY | $5,000 |
| ASSOC FOR WELFARE OF ANIMALS | $4,000 |
| PENLAND SCHOOL OF CRAFTS | $3,000 |
| CLEVELAND COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL | $3,000 |
| EMPTY STOCKING FUND | $2,500 |
| BAILEY ENDOWMENT INC | $2,451 |
| BROTHERS IN CHRIST OUTREACH MINISTR | $2,000 |
| NORTH CAROLINA SYMPHONY | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against +2% for the ones you funded once.
18 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2018, 6% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.7M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PSPenland School Of Craft2× · 2017–2018 · $6k · revenue +28%
- CCCleveland County Arts Council Inc2× · 2017–2018 · $6k · revenue +16%
- CMCOMMUNITY MATH ACADEMY INC2× · 2017–2018 · $4k · revenue +67%
Funded once
- GWGWU WOMEN'S ATHLETIC PROGRAMone grant, 2017 · $12k
- GCGRACE CHRISTIAN ACADEMYone grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +2%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Childcare/education services
Proividing a classical christian academy for school-age children for the youth of brown county and surrounding counties
Quality education from a biblical perspective.
Nrca is a community christian school assisting families in providing excellence in academics, fine arts, and athletics while instilling biblical principles in students' lives that they might impact their society for christ.
To provide christian education for students
Provide Group and Foster care for Homeless Children and Counseling
Operation of a non-profit school
Provide a christian education to children
To coordinate a collaborative, multi-disciplinary approach to child abuse cases. To provide private forensic interviews and medical exams in a child-friendly environment.
Educational
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grace Christian Academy and the most unlike its peers is Brothers in Christ Outreach Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BAILEY ENDOWMENT INC ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION FOR THE WELFARE OF ANIMALS ↗
- Who funds Penland School Of Craft ↗
- Who funds Cleveland County Arts Council Inc ↗
- Who funds GRACE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY MATH ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds BROTHERS IN CHRIST OUTREACH MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds Childrens Homes of Cleveland County Inc ↗
- Who funds NORTH CAROLINA SYMPHONY SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR CHARITY LEAGUE OF SHELBY INC ↗
- Who funds CROSSROADS RESCUE MISSION ↗
- Who funds CLEVELAND-RUTHERFORD KIDNEY ASSOCIATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Dover Foundation Inc · Bailey Endowment Inc · The Paul and Margaret Porter Charitable Foundation · Albemarle Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Joseph M Wright Char Found Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Joseph M Wright Char Found Inc?
Find your warmest path to Joseph M Wright Char Found Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.