· Private foundation
Joseph B & Nancy M Tynan Family Foundati
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 41% of JOSEPH B & NANCY M TYNAN FAMILY FOUNDATI’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k21 grants · $41k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE WATERSHED FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF VENICE INC | $5,000 |
| DAMAR SERVICES INC | $5,000 |
| TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| TABLE FOUNDATION | $3,000 |
| UNBOUND | $2,200 |
| CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF FORT WAYNE-SOUTH BEND | $2,000 |
| JESUS IN HAITI MINISTRIES INC | $2,000 |
| SMILE TRAIN | $2,000 |
| NORTH WEBSTER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| LAKE TIPPECANOE PROPERTY | $2,000 |
| ROSE-HULMAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY | $1,000 |
| WOUNDED WARRIORS PROJECT | $1,000 |
| KOSCIUSKO COUNTY COMMUNITY CENTER | $1,000 |
| EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $72k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 53% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +65% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.
28 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TFTABLE FOUNDATION COMPANY8× · 2018–2025 · $24k · revenue +255%
- UUnbound9× · 2017–2025 · $19k · revenue +2%
- LTLAKE TIPPECANOE PROPERTY OWNERS INC9× · 2017–2025 · $18k · revenue +36%
Funded once
- OTONE TO FOUR REHABILITATION CORPORATIONone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -72%
- MHMARIAN HIGH SCHOOL OMAHAone grant, 2022 · $5k
- 1F1TO4 FOUNDATIONone grant, 2024 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide services in response to individual need
New hope of indiana, inc. is a leader in providing holistic services and resources to persons with disabilities and their families while advocating to advance the opportunities for those in need of support.
Catholic charities serves to not only meet the immediate needs of the vulnerable within our communities but to provide solutions that embrace a path to stability for those we are privileged to serve. catholic charities is the primary…
Cathedral center's mission is to provide a safe environment for women and families, while working to end homelessness one life at a time. the cathedral center serves unaccompanied women and families with children who are homeless or…
Hamilton center exists to provide quality behavioral healthcare, wellness, and human development services to our community.
Empowering individuals to build stronger families and communities.
Our mission, vision and approach to homelessness are rooted in core hawaiian values that guide our outcomes and overall impact.
Serves as a safety net for those summit county residents who are most in need of behavioral health services as a result of severe and persistent mental illness the agency proveides comprehensive, high quality, cost-effective treatment,…
Empowering people living with mental health and substance use disorders to thrive in their community through collaboration, treatment, education and advocacy.
Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us
We, house of mercy and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. house of mercy is a member of trinity health.
Through shelter and housing, advocacy and supportive services, our mission is to prevent and end homelessness in our community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is Unbound. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TABLE FOUNDATION COMPANY ↗
- Who funds Unbound ↗
- Who funds JESUS IN HAITI MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds LAKE TIPPECANOE PROPERTY OWNERS INC ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF VENICE INC ↗
- Who funds O'HANA HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CARDINAL SERVICES INC OF INDIANA ↗
- Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds ONE TO FOUR REHABILITATION CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds KOSCIUSKO COMMUNITY YMCA INC ↗
- Who funds Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology ↗
- Who funds COMBINED COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Damar Services Inc ↗
- Who funds IVY TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds KOSCIUSKO COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE SHEPHERD'S HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds ANNA MARIA ISLAND COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds HEART MINISTRY CENTER ↗
- Who funds CASA OF KOSCIUSKO COUNTY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Zimmer Biomet Foundation Inc · Aws Foundation Inc · Lake City Bank Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Joseph B & Nancy M Tynan Family Foundati funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.