Skip to content

· Private foundation

Joseph & Sherrie Garfield Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$533k
Granted FY2024still arriving
30
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$917kReligion$885kHealth$472kInternational$416kEducation$387kPhilanthropy$268kYouth Development$175kFood & Nutrition$100kOther$0
02FY2024 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k24 grants · $507k
$20,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$9.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNION OF MESSIANIC JEWISH CONGREGATIONS$30,000
AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR TEL AVIV FOUNDATION$30,000
CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY$30,000
CARE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$30,000
Individual grant recipient$30,000
HIS HOUSE CHILDREN'S HOME$30,000
MESSIANIC JEWISH THEOLOGICAL INSTITUTE (MJTI)$30,000
UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI - HILLEL$30,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MIAMI-DADE INC$25,000
EDUCATE TOMORROW CORP$25,000
KRISTI HOUSE INC$21,641
GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION$20,272
CHILDREN'S BEREAVEMENT CENTER$20,000
SHAKE A LEG MIAMI INC$20,000
VOICES FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $443k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY: $38k → 15%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY: $35k → 15%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY: $35k → 15%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY: $35k → 15%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY: $35k → 15%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY: $35k → 15%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY: $30k → 15%CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP INC: $10k → 15%CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP INC: $10k → 15%CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP INC: $10k → 15%CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP INC: $10k → 15%CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP INC: $10k → 15%CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP INC: $10k → 15%CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP INC: $10k → 15%CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP INC: $10k → 15%MIAMI LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $100k → 15%MIAMI LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $10k → 15%GENESIS HOPEFUL HAVEN: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
OH
NJ
CT
MD
NM
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.9M · 35 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

35 repeat relationships: 28 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
4

Total granted

$3.9M
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+211%

Still filing today

49%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentHealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    THE AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE TEL AVIV FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $305k · revenue +289%
  • HH
    HIS HOUSE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $217k · revenue +79%
  • ET
    EDUCATE TOMORROW CORP
    8× · 2017–2024 · $201k · revenue +87%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • FC
    FIRST CHOICE WOMEN'S CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • BC
    BARTON-RAVLIN CHAPTER THE WOMEN'S CANCER ASSOCIATION UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Citrus Health Network Inc

To provide primary care and behavioral health services to children, adults, and families in south florida across a broad range of health services and community-based programs; and to oversee the coordinated child welfare system of care…

—
2
The Ljd Jewish Family & Community Services Inc

The mission of the ljd jewish family & community services, inc. is to strengthen the entire community by providing family and individual social services in the jewish tradition of helping people help themselves.

Human Services
3
Miami Bridge Youth and Family Services Inc

Provide crisis intervention for youths.

—
4
Children's Case Management Organization Inc D/B/a Families First of Pb County

Families first of palm beach county, through innovative programs, promotes generational change by addressing families emotional, physical, and social well-being.

Environment
5
Ywca South Florida Inc

Provide services and programs for women, teens, children, and families of miami-dade county in focusing our mission of eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all.

Human Services
6
Isaiah's Place 1

The organization aims to connect, nurture, and restore children and families in the communities they serve. the organization accomplishes this mission through their foster care and adoption program as well as their child advocacy center.…

Human Services
7
Families First of Palm Beach County Foundation Inc

To cultivate financial resources dedicated to building stronger families and stronger communities through the operations and programs of families first. contributing to the foundation is an investment in a safe, healthy and sustainable…

Human Services
8
The Florida Center for Early Childhood Inc

The florida center supports the healthy development of young children, specializing in those with delays, disabilities or mental health challenges. our mission- "to help build and foster strong families and expand the potential of young…

Human Services
9
Florida's Children First Inc

Organization mission: florida's children first is a non-profit, nonpartisan, independent advocacy organization committed to protecting and advancing the rights of children and youth impacted by the child welfare, juvenile justice, and…

Human Services
10
The Ferd and Gladys Alpert Jewish Family & Children Service of Palm Beach C Ounty Inc

The mission of ferd & gladys alpert jewish family & children's service of palm beach county, inc. is to serve the community by: - providing a range of needed social services to strengthen individuals and families. - participating in…

Human Services
11
Daybreak Inc

To provide miami valley homeless and vulnerable youth with services that promote safety, stability and well-being.

Human Services
12
Bigs & Littles Nyc Mentoring Inc

Bigs & littles nyc mentoring is a nonprofit community-based organization which transforms the lives of vulnerable nyc children and strengthens families through professionally guided one-to-one mentoring, life skills programming, and…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Voices for Children Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Alfalit International Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
15/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI - HILLEL: $270,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MIAMI - HILLELUNION OF MESSIANIC JEWISH CONGREGATIONS: $240,000 · OtherUNION OF MESSIANIC JEWISH CONGREGATIONSMESSIANIC JEWISH THEOLOGICAL INSTITUTE (MJTI): $240,000 · OtherMESSIANIC JEWISH THEOLOGICAL INSTITUTE (MJTI)Individual grant recipient: $240,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHIS HOUSE INC: $217,000 · OtherHIS HOUSE INCVOICES FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $125,000 · OtherVOICES FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION INCCHEVRA: $120,000 · OtherCHEVRATEL AVIV FOUNDATION: $107,500 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE YEMIN ORDER: $90,000 · OtherBELLO HORIZONTE ASSOCIACAO MINISTERIO ENSINADNDO DE SIAO-BRAZIL: $80,000 · OtherSOUTH MIAMI HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $80,000 · Other+14 more: $317,560 · Other+14 moreTHE AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE TEL AVIV FOUNDATION INC: $305,000 · InternationalTHE AMERICAN C…EDUCATE TOMORROW CORP: $200,500 · InternationalEDUCATE TOMORR…ALFALIT INTERNATIONAL INC: $20,000 · International+2 more: $10,720 · InternationalTHE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF FLORIDA: $242,875 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN…MIAMI LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED INC: $110,000 · Human ServicesMIAMI LIGHTH…CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP INC: $80,000 · Human ServicesCHAPMAN PART…+1 more: $10,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S BEREAVEMENT CENTER INC: $200,000 · EducationCHILDREN'…CARE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL INC: $146,000 · EducationCARE ELEM…GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $160,744 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC: $100,000 · PhilanthropyBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF MIAMI INC: $165,000 · Youth DevelopmentSHAKE A LEG MIAMI INC: $139,000 · HealthKRISTI HOUSE INC: $91,641 · Crime & Legal
Other$2,127,060International$536,220Human Services$442,875Education$346,000Philanthropy$260,744Youth Development$165,000Health$139,000Crime & Legal$91,641

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE TEL AVIV FOUNDATION INC: $305,000 over 5y, 12% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF FLORIDA: $242,875 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHIS HOUSE INC: $217,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetEDUCATE TOMORROW CORP: $200,500 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S BEREAVEMENT CENTER INC: $200,000 over 8y, 3.6% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF MIAMI INC: $165,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $160,744 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCARE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL INC: $146,000 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetSHAKE A LEG MIAMI INC: $139,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetVOICES FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $125,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetMIAMI LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED INC: $110,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC: $100,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetKRISTI HOUSE INC: $91,641 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetCHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP INC: $80,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFIRST SERVE MIAMI INC: $35,000 over 7y, 2.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $12,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGENESIS HOPEFUL HAVEN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $720 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE TEL AVIV FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF FLORIDA ↗
  • Who funds HIS HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATE TOMORROW CORP ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S BEREAVEMENT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF MIAMI INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CARE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds SHAKE A LEG MIAMI INC ↗
  • Who funds VOICES FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MIAMI LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC ↗
  • Who funds KRISTI HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds FIRST SERVE MIAMI INC ↗
  • Who funds ALFALIT INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds GENESIS HOPEFUL HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Miami Foundation IncFL24.9× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Miami Foundation Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Peacock Foundation Inc · The Batchelor Foundation Inc · United Way Miami Inc · The Kirk Foundation · Dunspaugh Dalton Foundation Inc · Greater Miami Jewish Federation Inc · Hobbs Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Joseph & Sherrie Garfield Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Joseph & Sherrie Garfield Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • His House Inc: 75% of income from government
  • Kristi House Inc: 49% of income from government
  • Voices for Children Foundation Inc: 48% of income from government
  • Care Elementary School Inc: 8% of income from government
  • The Children's Home Society of Florida: 6% of income from government
  • Miami Lighthouse for the Blind and Visually Impaired Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Chapman Partnership Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Educate Tomorrow Corp: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Joseph & Sherrie Garfield Charitable Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Joseph & Sherrie Garfield Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Joseph & Sherrie Garfield’s filings →

More from the funding graph