Skip to content

· Private foundation

Joseph and Martha Melohn Fund

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$67k
Granted FY2022
6
Grants FY2022
—
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Religion$350kInternational$120kArts & Culture$60kYouth Development$39kPhilanthropy$13kEducation$2kCivil Rights$2kOther$0
02FY2022 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $34,510, the rows itemized in this filing. The $66,944 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $32,434 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k5 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $18k
$7,800
Median grant
—
States reached
$19k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Congregation Yeshiva Yad Moishe$18,400
Bnos Bais Yaakov of Far Rockaway$7,800
Yeshiva Ketana of Long Island$7,800
cong ahavas torah Vechesed$180
Holtzberg Kindness Foundation$180
Shalom Torah Centers$150
02Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

43%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$266k · 11 repeat orgs$355k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2022, 9 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
35

Total granted

$266k
$337k

Still filing today

0%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22
PhilanthropyReligionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • H
    HAFTR
    2× · 2017–2018 · $64k
  • YK
    Yeshiva Ketana Of Manhattan
    2× · 2017–2018 · $38k
  • V1
    Various < 1,000
    2× · 2017–2018 · $36k

Funded once

  • AF
    American Friends Of Hala
    one grant, 2017 · $120k
  • SM
    SWC Museum
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • MH
    Manhattan HS for Girls
    one grant, 2017 · $29k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Its field
03the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

American Friends Of Hala: $120,000 · OtherAmerican Friends Of HalaHAFTR: $64,000 · OtherHAFTRSWC Museum: $50,000 · OtherSWC MuseumYeshiva Ketana Of Manhattan: $37,500 · OtherYeshiva Ketana Of ManhattanVarious < 1,000: $36,191 · OtherVarious < 1,000Manhattan HS for Girls: $28,600 · OtherYeshiva Ketana Of Passaic: $25,000 · OtherBnos Bais Yaakov of Far Rockaway: $22,960 · OtherCONGREGATION DARCHEI TORAH: $22,400 · Other+35 more: $196,683 · Other+35 moreO A E PINSK KARLIN INC: $10,800 · Philanthropy+2 more: $280 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAGDIL TORAH INC: $6,000 · Arts & CultureBeth Ahron V'Israel - BAVI Chesed Fund Inc: $506 · ReligionCONGREGATION KOLLEL OF SOUTH FALLSBURG: $100 · Religion
Other$603,334Philanthropy$11,080Arts & Culture$6,000Religion$606

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetO A E PINSK KARLIN INC: $10,800 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAGDIL TORAH INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBeth Ahron V'Israel - BAVI Chesed Fund Inc: $506 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBEER HAGOLAH INSTITUTES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF YESHIVA TEHILAS SHLOMO INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds O A E PINSK KARLIN INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAGDIL TORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds Beth Ahron V'Israel - BAVI Chesed Fund Inc ↗
  • Who funds BEER HAGOLAH INSTITUTES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY32.9× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · The Jmg Foundation · Center for Initiatives in Jewish Education · Malchus Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Metrowest NJ · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Joseph and Martha Melohn Fund?

Find your warmest path to Joseph and Martha Melohn Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Joseph and Martha Melohn’s filings →

More from the funding graph