· Private foundation
Jorgensen Foundation
Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2020.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Boys and Girls Home of North Caroli | $1,000 |
| Place of Hope | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| Epworth Children's Home | $1,000 |
| Hope Children's Home | $1,000 |
| Real Life Children's Ranch | $1,000 |
| Tennnyson Center for Children | $1,000 |
| Eagle Ranch | $1,000 |
| Children's Services Auxiliary | $1,000 |
| Casa de Amparo | $1,000 |
| New Mexico Christian Children's Hom | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–20, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
9 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2020, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2020, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HIHope International Ministries Inc2× · 2019–2020 · $2k · revenue +16%
- ECEPWORTH CHILDREN'S HOME2× · 2019–2020 · $2k · revenue +42%
- CDCasa De Amparo2× · 2019–2020 · $2k · revenue +32%
Funded once
- BFBROOKWOOD FLORIDA INCone grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue -14%
- TCTennyson Center for Childrenone grant, 2019 · $1k
- CHCoyote Hill Foster Care Ministriesgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue +159%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Christain Home
Sunny Glen Childrens Home, Inc. cares for children in need. Our care will be competent, compassionate and professional. We will help every child achieve their greatest potential-physically, emotionally, spiritually and academically.
Provide safe & loving home for children
The home provides care for children and wards of the court placed for foster home purposes.
Covenant childrens home is to provide a residence, food and clothing plus a continuum of care including physical, emotional, and spiritual nurturing for neglected, abandoned or abused children.
Soaring wings provides a christ-centered home for children while working with their families to overcome challenges they are facing for as long as needed.
Provide a safe and therapeutic living environment for abused, neglected, and displaced children ages 5-17 by delivering services that transform lives and prepares for family reunification throught elements of love, hope and restoration.
The organization provides housing medical care education and loving support for homeless children in peru. the home is located in arequipa peru. the organization houses approximately 50 children and assists children no longer residing at…
To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.
Treating substance use disorders, rebuilding lives, strengthening families, and empowering women.
Provide a home for children who have been abandoned and abused.
We build relationships that enhance the development of skills, foster a sense of worth and enhance a belief in each child's individual potential.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Mexico Christian Childrens Home and the most unlike its peers is Brookwood Florida Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Real Life Children's Ranch Inc ↗
- Who funds Hope International Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS HOMES OF NC INC ↗
- Who funds EPWORTH CHILDREN'S HOME ↗
- Who funds Casa De Amparo ↗
- Who funds EAGLE RANCH INC ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO CHRISTIAN CHILDRENS HOME ↗
- Who funds BROOKWOOD FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds PLACE OF HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds Coyote Hill Foster Care Ministries ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jorgensen Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Brookwood Florida Inc — 7% of income from government
- Real Life Children's Ranch Inc — 0% of income from government
- Place of Hope Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.