Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Jordan Schuman Foundation for Kindness Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$11kHealth$6kFood & Nutrition$3kPhilanthropy$2kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kHuman Services$2kInternational$2kYouth Development$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$230
Median grant
6
States reached
$37k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RCMAORG REDLANDS CHRISTIAN MINISTRY$1,000
SHUFSF SCHOLARSHIP FUND$1,000
NATL OVARIAN CANCER COALITION$518
JDCORG$516
ELTON JOHN AIDES FDN$268
BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FDN$258
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING$250
THE GOOD NEIGHBOR FUND$250
Individual grant recipient$230
BROADWAY CARES$206
Individual grant recipient$205
ST JUDES CHILDRENS HOSPITA$200
ADLORG$188
HADASSAH$185
UJA$180
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 81% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $125 → 14%COMMUNITY COOPERATIVE: $1k → 11%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $50 → 7%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $100 → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $100 → 14%LONG ISLAND CARES: $103 → 7%LONG ISLAND CARES: $100 → 7%COVENANT HOUSE: $100 → 17%LONG ISLAND CARES: $100 → 7%COVENANT HOUSE: $100 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
MI
NY
IA
NJ
CT
CA
VA
AZ
TN
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$18k · 18 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
54

Total granted

$18k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+49%

Still filing today

39%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthPhilanthropyInternationalArts & CultureCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $1k · revenue +25%
  • ELTON JOHN AIDS FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $868 · revenue +172%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    3× · 2019–2021 · $325 · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • TC
    TRI COMMUNITY AND YOUTH AGENCY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +49%
  • (V
    (LIFE VEST) KINDNESS BOOMERANG BOOK
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • KL
    KEEP LEE COUNTY BEAUTIFUL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue +39%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
2
Us Digital Response

U.s. digital response is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that helps governments, nonprofits, and public entities respond quickly to critical public needs. the organization serves the public by leveraging a network of pro bono…

Public Safety & Disaster
3
Moral Compass Federation Inc

Moral compass federation facilitates collaboration among multiple veteran-led nonprofit organizations, individuals, and businesses who came together during the fall of kabul, afghanistan to evacuate and resettle afghan allies who were in…

Public Benefit
4
Unicef Usa Impact Fund for Children Inc

The unicef usa impact fund for children exists to develop and implement financial solutions to ensure every child is healthy, educated, protected, and respected. we believe truly scalable, long-term impact will only be accomplished when we…

Philanthropy
5
Social Current Inc

Social current's mission as developed and approved by its board of directors is to advocate for and implement equitable solutions to society's toughest challenges through collaboration, innovation, policy, and practice excellence.

Human Services
6
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
7
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

8
International Federation of Accountants

Ifac acts in the public interest and has no profit-making purpose. ifac serves the public interest by: speaking out and engaging as the voice for the global profession; leading and developing a future-ready accountancy profession; and…

Education
9
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
10
International Food Information Council

To effectively communicate science based information on food safety, nutrition, and health for the public good.

Arts & Culture
11
American Society of Clinical Oncology Inc

See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.

Health
12
National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors

Empowering financial professionals and consumers through world-class advocacy and education.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bob Woodruff Family Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCancer Support OrganizationsJewish Community FederationsCommunity Arts OrganizationsChild and Family ServicesVeteran Support ServicesFood Pantries & Assistance
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%8%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%23%10–20yr19%31%20–35yr13%19%35–55yr16%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%5%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%20%10–20yr19%40%20–35yr13%27%35–55yr16%8%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 4% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
4%1/27
the rest of the field
10%
11,858/120,733

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 81 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
19/25
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SHUFSF SCHOLARSHIP FUND — $7,500 · OtherSHUFSF SCHOLARSHIP FUNDSHUF SD SCHOLARSHIP FUND — $2,700 · OtherSHUF SD SCHOLARSHIP FUNDBROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC — $1,233 · OtherRCMAORG REDLANDS CHRISTIAN MINISTRY — $1,000 · Other(LIFE VEST) KINDNESS BOOMERANG BOOK — $1,000 · OtherST JUDES CHILDRENS HOSPITAL — $904 · Other+57 more — $10,837 · Other+57 moreCOMMUNITY COOPERATIVE INC — $1,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $325 · Human ServicesLong Island Cares Inc — $303 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE — $200 · Human Services+1 more — $50 · Human ServicesELTON JOHN AIDS FOUNDATION INC — $868 · HealthNATIONAL OVARIAN CANCER COALITION INC — $518 · HealthBOB WOODRUFF FAMILY FOUNDATION INC — $303 · HealthCancer Care Inc — $100 · HealthSCPD Cops Who Care Inc — $1,000 · PhilanthropySTAND UP TO CANCER — $327 · PhilanthropyGOFUNDMEORG — $220 · PhilanthropyREDWOOD CREDIT UNION COMMUNITY FUND INC — $100 · PhilanthropyTRI COMMUNITY AND YOUTH AGENCY INC — $1,000 · Crime & LegalSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION — $100 · Crime & LegalKEEP LEE COUNTY BEAUTIFUL INC — $1,000 · EnvironmentMEDFORD FIRE DEPT INC — $500 · Public Safety & DisasterNETWORK FOR GOOD — $150 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$25,174Human Services$1,878Health$1,789Philanthropy$1,647Crime & Legal$1,100Environment$1,000Public Safety & Disaster$650

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC — $1,233 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTRI COMMUNITY AND YOUTH AGENCY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKEEP LEE COUNTY BEAUTIFUL INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSCPD Cops Who Care Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY COOPERATIVE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetELTON JOHN AIDS FOUNDATION INC — $868 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMEDFORD FIRE DEPT INC — $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $325 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLong Island Cares Inc — $303 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOB WOODRUFF FAMILY FOUNDATION INC — $303 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG — $220 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC — $210 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRO PUBLICA INC — $208 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $126 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCancer Care Inc — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREDWOOD CREDIT UNION COMMUNITY FUND INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCharity Navigator — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC
  • Who funds TRI COMMUNITY AND YOUTH AGENCY INC
  • Who funds KEEP LEE COUNTY BEAUTIFUL INC
  • Who funds SCPD Cops Who Care Inc
  • Who funds COMMUNITY COOPERATIVE INC
  • Who funds ELTON JOHN AIDS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL OVARIAN CANCER COALITION INC
  • Who funds MEDFORD FIRE DEPT INC
  • Who funds STAND UP TO CANCER
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds Long Island Cares Inc
  • Who funds BOB WOODRUFF FAMILY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds GOFUNDMEORG
  • Who funds NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds PRO PUBLICA INC
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE6.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jordan Schuman Foundation for Kindness Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation0% of income from government
  • Keep Lee County Beautiful Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Jordan Schuman Foundation for Kindness Inc?

Find your warmest path to Jordan Schuman Foundation for Kindness Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 81 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph