Skip to content
Joni Elaine Templeton Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Joni Elaine Templeton Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$153k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$318kFood & Nutrition$98kEducation$98kAnimals$93kHuman Services$83kHousing & Shelter$70kPhilanthropy$65kCrime & Legal$28kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $113k
$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES$30,000
COMMUNITY FDN OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY$25,000
AUSTIN PETS ALIVE$17,500
HOSPICE AUSTIN$10,000
RUTLEDGE CANCER FOUNDATION$10,000
CENTRAL TEXAS FOOD BANK INC$10,000
ARC OF THE CAPITAL AREA$10,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL TEXAS$7,500
MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC$5,000
AUSTIN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC$5,000
BOOKSPRING$5,000
SEEDLING FOUNDATION$5,000
AUSTIN CLUBHOUSE INC$5,000
ST EDWARDS UNIVERSITY$5,000
AUSTIN DIAPER BANK$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $90k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOSPICE AUSTIN: $10k → 10%GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION: $5k → 11%HOSPICE AUSTIN: $10k → 10%GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION: $5k → 11%HOSPICE AUSTIN: $10k → 10%GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION: $5k → 11%HOSPICE AUSTIN: $10k → 10%HOSPICE AUSTIN: $10k → 10%HOSPICE AUSTIN: $10k → 10%HOSPICE AUSTIN: $10k → 10%AUSTIN DIAPER BANK: $3k → 10%MEALS ON WHEELS: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$775k · 24 repeat orgs$78k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
14

Total granted

$775k
$75k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+54%

Still filing today

92%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationAnimalsHealthFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    THE ARC OF THE CAPITAL AREA
    7× · 2017–2025 · $70k · revenue +17%
  • HA
    HOSPICE AUSTIN
    7× · 2017–2025 · $70k · revenue +72%
  • RC
    RUTLEDGE CANCER FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $60k · revenue +153%

Funded once

  • CI
    COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF CENTRAL
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • CI
    COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • CJ
    CARLEY J RUTLEDGE SARCOMA FDN
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Austin Street Center

The mission of austin street center is to provide emergency shelter and related services to the homeless. programs provide crisis intervention, substance abuse awareness information and opportunities to improve present life situations to…

—
2
Any Baby Can of Austin Inc

Any baby can, an austin-based nonprofit, partners with parents so children reach their full potential. with programs that meet clients where they are at home, work or school any baby can provides in-home therapy, parent education, mental…

—
3
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
4
Feeding Texas

To lead a unified effort for a hunger-free texas.

Community Improvement
5
Central Texas Spca

Rescue neglected, unwanted homeless dogs and cats nurture and provide shelter until they are placed with a forever family strive to reduce animal overpopulation prevent cruelty to animals teach responsible pet ownership through an outreach…

Animals
6
Texprotects-the Texas Association for the Protection of Children

TexProtects advances public policy and local implementation to strenghten families to prevent child abuse and neglect.

Youth Development
7
Center for Austin Independent Journalism

To equip Austinites to make informed decisions through independent, in-depth reporting, diverse opinions, and civil dialogue. A strong local press is essential for a healthy community and democracy. We work to make Austin a more empowered…

Arts & Culture
8
HomeAid Austin Inc

Engage in building procted to provide emergency shelters, transitional housing, and permanent housing while offering job skills training and support to help residents move toward self-sufficiency.

Employment
9
Keep Austin Fed

Reduce hunger and help the environment by connecting surplus food with our neighbors in need.

Food & Nutrition
10
Raise Texas

RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…

Human Services
11
Austin Affordable Housing Corporation

To ensure and preserve quality, affordable housing opportunities for low- to moderate-income families in austin as well as provide financial literacy and homeownership opportunities.

Housing & Shelter
12
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for Child Protection; the most unlike its peers is Meals On Wheels. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/32
Grantees still filing
23/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE ARC OF THE CAPITAL AREA: $70,000 · OtherTHE ARC OF THE CAPITAL AREATHE AUSTIN CENTER FOR GRIEF AND LOSS: $60,000 · OtherTHE AUSTIN CENTER FOR GRIEF AND LOSSAUSTIN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $30,100 · OtherAUSTIN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INCCARITAS OF AUSTIN: $30,000 · OtherCARITAS OF AUSTINHUMANE SOCIETY OF AUSTIN AND TRAVIS: $27,500 · OtherHUMANE SOCIETY OF AUSTIN AND TRAVISJUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH: $25,000 · OtherJUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCHBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL TEXAS INC: $17,500 · OtherMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC: $30,000 · OtherMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC+13 more: $85,300 · Other+13 moreRUTLEDGE CANCER FOUNDATION: $60,000 · HealthRUTLEDGE CANCER…BREAKTHROUGH T1D: $55,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1…Austin Clubhouse Inc: $7,500 · HealthAustin Clubhous…St Edwards University: $35,000 · EducationSt Edwards Un…COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $30,000 · EducationCOMMUNITIES I…SEEDLING FOUNDATION: $25,000 · EducationSEEDLING FOUN…BookSpring: $12,500 · EducationBookSpringHOSPICE AUSTIN: $70,000 · Human ServicesHOSPICE AUS…THE GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION: $15,000 · Human ServicesTHE GLADNEY…+2 more: $5,100 · Human Services+2 moreAUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC: $42,500 · AnimalsTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF AUSTIN & TRAVIS COUNTY INC: $15,000 · AnimalsHILL COUNTRY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $5,000 · AnimalsSHADOW CATS RESCUE: $2,500 · AnimalsRONALD McDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER NORTH TEXAS INC: $40,000 · PhilanthropyTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY INC: $25,000 · PhilanthropyCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $50,100 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS AND MORE INC: $7,500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$375,400Health$122,500Education$102,500Human Services$90,100Animals$65,000Philanthropy$65,000Food & Nutrition$57,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE ARC OF THE CAPITAL AREA: $70,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetHOSPICE AUSTIN: $70,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AUSTIN CENTER FOR GRIEF AND LOSS: $60,000 over 5y, 4.7% of budgetRUTLEDGE CANCER FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $55,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $50,100 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC: $42,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetRONALD McDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER NORTH TEXAS INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetSt Edwards University: $35,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $30,100 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCARITAS OF AUSTIN: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC: $30,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSEEDLING FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL TEXAS INC: $17,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF AUSTIN & TRAVIS COUNTY INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBookSpring: $12,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetNAMI NORTH TEXAS: $10,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetHOME POINT: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAustin Clubhouse Inc: $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS AND MORE INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSUSTAINABLE FOOD CENTER: $7,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE SAFE ALLIANCE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAustin Child Guidance Center: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHILL COUNTRY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR CHILD PROTECTION: $2,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHADOW CATS RESCUE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAUSTIN DIAPER BANK: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St David's FoundationThe Moody FoundationTopfer Family Foundat…Austin Community Foun…Shield-Ayres Foundati…United Way for Greate…Better Business BureauDonald D Hammill Foun…Harry E and Eda L Mon…Charles Schwab Founda…Impact Austin Foundat…Mr and Mrs Nelson Rus…
St David's FoundationTX28.1× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St David's Foundation · The Moody Foundation · Topfer Family Foundation · Austin Community Foundation Inc · Shield-Ayres Foundation · United Way for Greater Austin · Better Business Bureau · Donald D Hammill Foundation · Harry E and Eda L Montandon Charitable Tr · Charles Schwab Foundation · Impact Austin Foundation · Mr and Mrs Nelson Rusche Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Joni Elaine Templeton Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Joni Elaine Templeton Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Joni Elaine Templeton’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home