Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jonathan S & Patricia G England Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$54k
Granted FY2023
7
Grants FY2023
4
States reached
$31k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

67% of Jonathan S & Patricia G England Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Schwab Charitable Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year Jonathan S & Patricia G England Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $54k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

8
’17
6
’18
5
’19
5
’20
6
’21
5
’22
5
’23
4
’24
0
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$203kEducation$87kHuman Services$25kCrime & Legal$24kHousing & Shelter$20kArts & Culture$18kAnimals$7kPublic Safety & Disaster$4kOther$0
02FY2023 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k6 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $31k
$4,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHARLES E SMITH LIFE COMMUNITIES$31,000
UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION$6,000
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA HASTINGS COLLEGE OF LAW$5,000
ROYAL DAMES OF CANCER RESEARCH INC$4,000
WOMEN IN DISTRESS OF BROWARD COUNTY INC$4,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF BROWARD COUNTY FL$3,500
BOSTON UNIVERSITY$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 35% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $3k → 16%SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND: $358k → 10%SACRAMENTO STATE- R MACINTOSH SCHOLARSHIP: $9k → 12%SIBLEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $5k → 14%PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS INC: $1k → 14%AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION FOR ALCTS: $5k → 14%CHARLES E SMITH LIFE COMMUNITIES: $31k → 8%NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART: $2k → 11%BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $3k → 16%SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND: $358k → 10%SACRAMENTO STATE- R MACINTOSH SCHOLARSHIP: $8k → 12%SIBLEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $3k → 14%THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF BROWARD COUNTY: $358k → 13%PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS INC: $1k → 14%AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION FOR ALCTS: $5k → 14%CHARLES E SMITH LIFE COMMUNITIES: $25k → 8%BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $3k → 16%SACRAMENTO STATE- R MACINTOSH SCHOLARSHIP: $5k → 12%PHILLIPS COLLECTION: $2k → 14%AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION: $5k → 14%CHARLES E SMITH LIFE COMMUNITIES: $20k → 8%BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $3k → 16%SACRAMENTO STATE- R MACINTOSH SCHOLARSHIP: $5k → 12%SIBLEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $2k → 14%ROYAL DAMES OF CANCER RESEARCH INC: $4k → 13%AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION FOR ALCTS: $5k → 14%CHARLES E SMITH LIFE COMMUNITIES: $20k → 8%BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $3k → 16%SACRAMENTO STATE- R MACINTOSH SCHOLARSHIP: $5k → 12%LIBRARY OF CONGRESS: $9k → 14%ROYAL DAMES OF CANCER RESEARCH INC: $4k → 13%CHARLES E SMITH LIFE COMMUNITIES: $20k → 8%SACRAMENTO STATE- R MACINTOSH SCHOLARSHIP: $3k → 12%LIBRARY OF CONGRESS: $5k → 14%ROYAL DAMES OF CANCER RESEARCH INC: $4k → 13%CHARLES E SMITH LIFE COMMUNITIES: $20k → 8%ROYAL DAMES OF CANCER RESEARCH INC: $2k → 13%CHARLES E SMITH LIFE COMMUNITIES: $18k → 8%ROYAL DAMES OF CANCER RESEARCH INC: $2k → 13%HASTINGS COLLEGE OF LAW: $3k → 8%ROYAL DAMES OF CANCER RESEARCH INC: $2k → 13%SUBURBAN HOSPITAL - JOHNS HOPKINS MEDICAL: $10k → 8%ROYAL DAMES OF CANCER RESEARCH INC: $2k → 13%SUBURBAN HOSPITAL - JOHNS HOPKINS MEDICAL: $8k → 8%BETHESDA-CHEVY CHASE RESCUE SQUAD INC: $2k → 8%BETHESDA-CHEVY CHASE RESCUE SQUAD INC: $2k → 8%HUMANE SOCIETY OF BROWARD COUNTY FL: $4k → 13%HUMANE SOCIETY OF BROWARD COUNTY FL: $4k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

48%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$361k · 17 repeat orgs$388k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2023, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
5

Total granted

$361k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+57%

Still filing today

41%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $358k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentEducationAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HH
    HEBREW HOME OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $154k · revenue +6%
  • WI
    WOMEN IN DISTRESS OF BROWARD COUNTY INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $20k · revenue +135%
  • RD
    ROYAL DAMES OF CANCER RESEARCH INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $19k · revenue +219%

Funded once

  • CE
    CHARLES E SMITH LIFE COMMUNITIES
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • AL
    AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +6%
  • TP
    THE PHILLIPS COLLECTIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +60%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
2
Proprietors of the Boston Athenaeum

The mission of the boston athenaeum is to engage all who seek knowledge by making accessible our library's collections and spaces, thereby inspiring reflection, discourse, creative expression, and joy.

Education
3
The Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences

The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).

Arts & Culture
4
Henry E Huntington Library and Art Gallery

The huntington library, art museum, and botanical gardens shares its world-renowned collections to support scholarship, foster learning, inspire creativity, and offer transformative experiences for diverse audiences.

Arts & Culture
5
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
6
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
7
The Central European University

Ceu is committed to promoting the values of open society and self-reflective critical thinking. it aims at excellence in the mastery of established knowledge, courage to pursue the creation of new knowledge in the humanities, the social…

International
8
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
9
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
10
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
11
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
12
The Pierpont Morgan Library

The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc; the most unlike its peers is National Gallery of Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $716,778 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INCTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF BROWARD COUNTY: $358,390 · OtherTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF BROWARD COUNT…SACRAMENTO STATE- R MACINTOSH SCHOLARSHIP: $33,500 · OtherSACRAMENTO STATE- R MACINTOSH SCHOLARSHIPCHARLES E SMITH LIFE COMMUNITIES: $20,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $19,000 · OtherSUBURBAN HOSPITAL - JOHNS HOPKINS MEDICAL: $18,250 · Other+9 more: $82,000 · Other+9 moreHEBREW HOME OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $154,000 · HealthHEBREW HOME O…ROYAL DAMES OF CANCER RESEARCH INC: $19,250 · HealthROYAL DAMES O…+1 more: $4,000 · HealthWOMEN IN DISTRESS OF BROWARD COUNTY INC: $20,250 · Human ServicesHUMANE SOCIETY OF BROWARD COUNTY INC: $7,000 · AnimalsAMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION: $5,000 · EducationPACE CENTER FOR GIRLSINC: $4,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE PHILLIPS COLLECTION: $2,000 · Arts & CultureNational Gallery of Art: $2,000 · Arts & Culture
Philanthropy$716,778Other$531,140Health$177,250Human Services$20,250Animals$7,000Education$5,000Youth Development$4,000Arts & Culture$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $716,778 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEBREW HOME OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $154,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN IN DISTRESS OF BROWARD COUNTY INC: $20,250 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetROYAL DAMES OF CANCER RESEARCH INC: $19,250 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $14,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF BROWARD COUNTY INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPACE CENTER FOR GIRLSINC: $4,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBETHESDA-CHEVY CHASE RESCUE SQUAD INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PHILLIPS COLLECTION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Gallery of Art: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds HEBREW HOME OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN IN DISTRESS OF BROWARD COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds ROYAL DAMES OF CANCER RESEARCH INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF BROWARD COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds PACE CENTER FOR GIRLSINC ↗
  • Who funds BETHESDA-CHEVY CHASE RESCUE SQUAD INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PHILLIPS COLLECTION ↗
  • Who funds National Gallery of Art ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN11× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jonathan S & Patricia G England Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jonathan S & Patricia G England Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Pace Center for Girlsinc: 2% of income from government
  • Hebrew Home of Greater Washington Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Jonathan S & Patricia G England Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Jonathan S & Patricia G England Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jonathan S & Patricia G England’s filings →

More from the funding graph