Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Jolly Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$18k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Environment$30kScience & Tech$17kReligion$16kHealth$13kArts & Culture$7kAnimals$7kEducation$6kHuman Services$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$750
Median grant
4
States reached
$150k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$3,500
CARETTA RESEARCH PROJECT$2,000
OGEECHEE RIVERKEEPER$1,200
MOUNTAIN FILM IN SAVANNAH$1,000
SAVANNAH TREE FOUNDATION$1,000
UNION MISSION$1,000
SAVANNAH WILDLIFE RESCUE CENTER$1,000
THE ORIANNE SOCIETY$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA$750
CHATHAM-SAVANNAH CITIZEN ADVOCACY$750
OSSABAW ISLAND FOUNDATION INC$750
SWAINSBORO BETTY GAMBRELL ANIMAL SHELTER$700
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$500
PRESBYTERIAN HOMES OF GEORGIA$500
SALVATION ARMY$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PRESBYTERIAN HOMES OF GEORGIA: $1k → 26%PRESBYTERIAN HOMES OF GEORGIA: $500 → 26%PRESBYTERIAN HOMES OF GEORGIA: $500 → 26%PRESBYTERIAN HOMES OF GEORGIA: $500 → 26%PRESBYTERIAN HOMES OF GEORGIA: $500 → 26%PRESBYTERIAN HOMES OF GEORGIA: $500 → 26%ABILITIES UNLIMITED: $1k → 16%ABILITIES UNLIMITED: $500 → 16%ABILITIES UNLIMITED: $500 → 16%ABILITIES UNLIMITED: $500 → 16%ABILITIES UNLIMITED: $500 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MT
IL
OR
CO
AZ
TN
NC
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 11% of Jolly Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 92% of the giving stays in GA; read by stated purpose it is 83% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Jolly Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$97k · 26 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +107% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.

26 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
27

Total granted

$97k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+107%
+23%

Still filing today

42%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsEnvironmentEducationHealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST
    SAVANNAH TREE FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $7k · revenue +165%
  • TO
    THE ORIANNE SOCIETY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $7k · revenue +114%
  • TO
    THE OSSABAW ISLAND FOUNDATIONINC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $4k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • EP
    ECOLOGY PROJECT INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue +19%
  • M
    MOUNTAINFILM
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +9%
  • GR
    GRAY'S REEF NAT'L MARINE SANCTUARY
    one grant, 2017 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Friends of the Osa

To promote land stewardship, to enhance the scientific understanding of tropical ecosystems and apply learning to conservation, to provide education and training for future generations and to enhance the quality of life for local…

Environment
2
Georgia Forestwatch Inc

Our mission is to enhance the health of over 867,000 acres of georgias national forest by protecting our forests and streams, advocating for natural processes, and identifying opportunities to improve forest management.

Environment
3
Ocmulgee Land Trust Inc

To acquire, transfer and manage land in a manner designed to promote the preservation of environmentally valuable or sensitive resources, recreational resources, agricultural resources, resources of historic or cultural importance and open…

Environment
4
Central Savannah River Land Trust Inc

To protect environmentally sensitive land throughout the central savannah river basin through the use of permnanent conservation easements and land acquisitions. also to educate the public on conservation related topics.

Environment
5
Environment Georgia Research and Policy Center

The corporation is organized for the purpose of conducting public interest research, policy development, analysis, and education to protect the environment and people of Georgia, including, but not limited to, the quality of Georgia's air,…

6
Atlantic Coast Conservancy Inc

The mission of the atlantic coast conservancy is to provide 21st century solutions and sound scientific applications for conservation of critical natural resources in the face of a changing climate, focusing on the southeasthern united…

Environment
7
The Sargasso Sea Project Inc

The mission of the organization is to achieve international recognition of the importance of the Sargasso Sea and to develop protection measures for it through competent regional and international organizations.

Environment
8
Chattahoochee Riverkeeper Inc

See schedule o - 01. general explanation attachment

Environment
9
Georgia Aquarium Foundation Inc

To be the fundraising arm for the georgia aquarium, inc., to hold financial and other investments for the benefit of the georgia aquarium, inc., and to make distributions/grants/loans to and for the benefit of the georgia aquarium, inc.…

Animals
10
Georgia River Network Inc dba Georgia Rivers

Georgia rivers works to protect and connect people with georgia's rivers.

Environment
11
Santa Barbara Channelkeeper Inc

The organization was established to protect and restore the santa barbara channel and its watersheds through science-based advocacy, education, field work, community engagement, and citizen enforcement of environmental laws.

Environment
12
South Carolina Aquarium

Our mission is to inspire conservation of the natural world by exhibiting and caring for animals, by excelling in education and research, and by providing an exceptional visitor experience.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Old Savannah City Mission Inc and the most unlike its peers is Greenbough House of Prayer. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyWildlife Rehabilitation Cen…Land Conservation Organizat…Homeless Services & ShelterChristian Missionary Organi…Developmental Disabilities …Cancer Support OrganizationsFaith-Based Senior LivingAnimal Rescue and AdoptionIndependent K-8 SchoolsClassical Music EnsemblesPublic University Foundatio…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number28%0%<5yr17%7%5–10yr20%26%10–20yr14%26%20–35yr9%19%35–55yr13%22%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value28%0%<5yr17%20%5–10yr20%12%10–20yr14%21%20–35yr9%14%35–55yr13%34%55yr+

The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 19% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/34
the rest of the field
19%
10,947/58,267

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
18/25
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CARETTA RESEARCH PROJECT — $16,000 · OtherCARETTA RESEARCH PROJECTBRAIN INJURY ASSOCIATION — $10,000 · OtherBRAIN INJURY ASSOCIATIONFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $8,850 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHSAVANNAH TREE FOUNDATION INC — $6,500 · OtherSAVANNAH TREE FOUNDATION INCUNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA — $5,750 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF GEORGIATHE OSSABAW ISLAND FOUNDATIONINC — $4,250 · OtherTHE OSSABAW ISLAND FOUNDATIONINCUNFORGETTABLE DREAM FUND — $2,750 · Other+35 more — $24,250 · Other+35 moreTHE ORIANNE SOCIETY — $6,500 · AnimalsTHE ORIAN…SAVANNAH WILDLIFE RESCUE CENTER INC — $3,000 · AnimalsSAVANNAH …+1 more — $300 · AnimalsOGEECHEE RIVERKEEPER INC — $4,250 · EnvironmentOGEECHEE …One Hundred Miles Inc — $3,500 · EnvironmentOne Hundr…ECOLOGY PROJECT INTERNATIONAL — $2,000 · EnvironmentECOLOGY P…PRESBYTERIAN HOMES OF GEORGIA INC — $3,500 · Human ServicesABILITIES UNLIMITED INC — $3,100 · Human ServicesTHE OLD SAVANNAH CITY MISSION INC — $2,050 · ReligionEast-West Ministries International — $750 · ReligionUNION MISSION INC — $2,700 · Housing & ShelterSAVANNAH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC — $1,100 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION — $600 · EducationFRIENDS OF OATLAND ISLAND — $500 · Education
Other$78,350Animals$9,800Environment$9,750Human Services$6,600Religion$2,800Housing & Shelter$2,700Education$2,200

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSAVANNAH TREE FOUNDATION INC — $6,500 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetTHE ORIANNE SOCIETY — $6,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE OSSABAW ISLAND FOUNDATIONINC — $4,250 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetOGEECHEE RIVERKEEPER INC — $4,250 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetOne Hundred Miles Inc — $3,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN HOMES OF GEORGIA INC — $3,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetABILITIES UNLIMITED INC — $3,100 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetSAVANNAH WILDLIFE RESCUE CENTER INC — $3,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetUNION MISSION INC — $2,700 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OLD SAVANNAH CITY MISSION INC — $2,050 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetECOLOGY PROJECT INTERNATIONAL — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAVANNAH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC — $1,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNTAINFILM — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHATHAM-SAVANNAH CITIZEN ADVOCACY — $750 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION — $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAVANNAH MUSIC FESTIVALINC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREENBOUGH HOUSE OF PRAYER — $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF OATLAND ISLAND — $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHEADS-UP GUIDANCE SERVICES INC — $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetISLA ANIMALS — $300 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOOPERRIIS INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCloud Forest School Foundation — $200 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAVANNAH TREE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds THE ORIANNE SOCIETY
  • Who funds THE OSSABAW ISLAND FOUNDATIONINC
  • Who funds OGEECHEE RIVERKEEPER INC
  • Who funds One Hundred Miles Inc
  • Who funds PRESBYTERIAN HOMES OF GEORGIA INC
  • Who funds ABILITIES UNLIMITED INC
  • Who funds SAVANNAH WILDLIFE RESCUE CENTER INC
  • Who funds UNION MISSION INC
  • Who funds THE OLD SAVANNAH CITY MISSION INC
  • Who funds ECOLOGY PROJECT INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds SAVANNAH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds MOUNTAINFILM
  • Who funds CHATHAM-SAVANNAH CITIZEN ADVOCACY
  • Who funds East-West Ministries International
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SAVANNAH MUSIC FESTIVALINC
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds GREENBOUGH HOUSE OF PRAYER

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Savannah Community Foundation IncGA32.3× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Savannah Community Foundation Inc · Colonial Foundation Inc · John G Kennedy Foundation Inc · The Hodge Foundation Inc · Courtney Knight Gaines Foundation · The Arthur M Blank Family Foundation · Patagoniaorg · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jolly Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Jolly Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Jolly Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph