Skip to content

· Private foundation

Johnson Rockford Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$48k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$170kEducation$83kPhilanthropy$36kInternational$21kHealth$13kYouth Development$8kHuman Services$6kHousing & Shelter$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k24 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $28k
$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$488k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TRINITY EVANGELICAL DIVINITY SCHOOL$18,000
NORTHWEST COMMUNITY CHURCH$10,000
CRU$3,000
HELP TO HOME$2,000
MERCY SHIPS$1,500
PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER$1,250
CROSS WORLD$1,000
SHARE INTERNATIONAL$1,000
YOUTH FOR CHRIST$1,000
BETHEL CHURCH$1,000
SILOAM HEALTH$1,000
FIRST ASSEMBLY$1,000
NAPLES CHRISTIAN ACADEMY$1,000
GRACE CENTER FOUNDATION$1,000
ELIJAH'S TREE MINISTRY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HELP TO HOME: $2k → 10%BEVERLY FARM FOUNDATION: $2k → 15%BEVERLY FARM FOUNDATION: $2k → 15%BEVERLY FARM FOUNDATION: $1k → 15%SHARE INTERNATIONAL: $1k → 15%MILESTONE: $100 → 15%ROCK RIVER VALLEY PANTRY: $100 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 36% of Johnson Rockford Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 36% of the giving stays in FL; by stated purpose, 0%.

Johnson Rockford Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$322k · 65 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

65 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 45 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

65
50

Total granted

$322k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+19%

Still filing today

17%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationHousing & ShelterInternationalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BF
    BEVERLY FARM FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2020 · $4k · revenue +21%
  • GF
    Grace Foundation
    3× · 2020–2022 · $3k · revenue ×49
  • BARNABAS INTERNATIONAL
    4× · 2018–2021 · $3k · revenue +54%

Funded once

  • TI
    TRINITY INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • CF
    CRUSADES FOR CHRIST INC
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Samaritan's Purse

Samaritan's purse is a nondenominational evangelical christian organization providing spiritual and physical aid to hurting people around the world. since 1970, samaritan's purse has helped meet the needs of people who are victims of war,…

Religion
2
Amazing Facts International

To proclaim to the world the everlasting gospel of revelation 14:6-12 and to encourage revival in the remnant church by leading people to embrace salvation by faith in jesus, to establish them in the church, and to disciple all believers…

Religion
3
Heaven's Family

Heaven's family's mission is to advance the kingdom of the lord jesus christ. we do that by strategically linking kingdom needs and opportunities with resources that the lord has entrusted to those who love him. through god-given…

Religion
4
Global Faith Network
Human Services
5
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
6
Grace Community International

Grace community exists to glorify jesus christ through biblically-based teaching designed to win the world for christ through heads of households, disciple the world through families, equip christian families to live the christian life…

Housing & Shelter
7
Time of Grace Ministry

Time of grace is for people who want more growth and less struggle in their spiritual walk. we share the truth of god's word simply and clearly through television, print, and digital media that people view millions of times each month. we…

Religion
8
Faith Aid

The organization cares for the sick and suffering in Jesus name by partnering with Christian mission hospitals, helping patients unable to afford treatment, and supporting Mustard Seed House ministry locations in Kenya.

International
9
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
10
Commission to Every Nation

To advance the gospel of jesus christ to every nation through pastoral care and missionary support.

Religion
11
International Needs

International needs has the vision to transform lives and change communities by helping christian nationals serve both god and neighbor within their own countries.

—
12
North America Bible Institute

North America Bible Institute (NABI) is an evangelical graduate school, made up of students who are diverse in both ethnicity and ministry aims -- but united in great love for Jesus and his gospel. As a graduate school, NABI offers them…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rockford Rescue Mission Ministries; the most unlike its peers is Grace Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 122 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/26
Grantees still filing
16/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TRINITY EVANGELICAL DIVINITY SCHOOL: $53,000 · OtherTRINITY EVANGELICAL DIVINITY SCHOOLTRINITY EVANGELICAL DIVINITY SCHOOL: $50,380 · OtherTRINITY EVANGELICAL DIVINITY SCHOOLNORTHWEST COMMUNITY CHURCH: $20,000 · OtherNORTHWEST COMMUNITY CHURCHCRU: $13,700 · Other+104 more: $134,360 · Other+104 moreTrinity International University: $63,440 · EducationTrinity Internationa…+1 more: $500 · EducationJERUSALEM UNIVERSITY COLLEGE: $6,000 · InternationalGRACE CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · InternationalBEVERLY FARM FOUNDATION: $4,250 · Human ServicesHelp To Home Inc: $2,000 · Human ServicesSHARE INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,000 · Human Services+2 more: $200 · Human ServicesBARNABAS INTERNATIONAL: $2,500 · ReligionST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC: $1,200 · Housing & ShelterFAIRHAVEN CHRISTIAN RETIREMENT CENTER: $1,000 · Housing & ShelterFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentKIDS AROUND THE WORLD INC: $600 · Youth Development
Other$271,440Education$63,940International$8,000Human Services$7,450Religion$2,500Housing & Shelter$2,200Youth Development$1,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTrinity International University: $63,440 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJERUSALEM UNIVERSITY COLLEGE: $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBEVERLY FARM FOUNDATION: $4,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNaples Christian Academy: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBARNABAS INTERNATIONAL: $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGRACE CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHelp To Home Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $1,250 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC: $1,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRACE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 49% of budgetFAIRHAVEN CHRISTIAN RETIREMENT CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS AROUND THE WORLD INC: $600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetROCKFORD RESCUE MISSION MINISTRIES: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILESTONE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROCK RIVER VALLEY PANTRY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMERS RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Trinity International University ↗
  • Who funds JERUSALEM UNIVERSITY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds BEVERLY FARM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Naples Christian Academy ↗
  • Who funds Grace Foundation ↗
  • Who funds BARNABAS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds CRUSADES FOR CHRIST INC ↗
  • Who funds GRACE CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Help To Home Inc ↗
  • Who funds PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Northern ILIL15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Northern IL · Jeffrey R Anderson Charitable Foundation · Kristin L Anderson Charitable Foundation · Tracy E Anderson Charitable Foundation · The David & Colleen Anderson Charitable Foundation · Bergstrom Inc Charitable Foundation Xxxxx2008 · John & Linda Anderson Charitable Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Johnson Rockford Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Johnson Rockford Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 122 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Johnson Rockford’s filings →

    More from the funding graph