Skip to content

· Private foundation

Johnson James Hervey Char Ed Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$629k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$180k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$727kEducation$514kHealth$348kArts & Culture$234kPhilanthropy$143kCivil Rights$130kFood & Nutrition$81kRecreation & Sports$80kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $342k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $265k
$30,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$8.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Center for Inquiry International$180,000
San Diego State University$85,000
Atheists United$40,000
National Health Association$40,000
Thomas Paine National Historical As$37,500
Thomas Paine Memorial Association$35,000
Camp Quest Inc$35,000
Plant Powered Metro New York$35,000
Prader-Willi Syndrome Association$30,000
True North Health FDN$30,000
Father Joe's Village$20,000
Individual grant recipient$19,000
American Humanist Association$10,000
American Atheists$10,000
San Diego Natural History Museum$6,874
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Humanist Society of Greater Phoenix: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
WI
NY
OH
PA
NJ
CA
AZ
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 23 repeat orgs$245k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against -13% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
14

Total granted

$2.0M
$106k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
-13%

Still filing today

61%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $139k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthEducationFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NH
    NATIONAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION
    7× · 2017–2025 · $110k · revenue +500%
  • PS
    PRADER-WILLI SYNDROME ASSOCIATION
    5× · 2017–2025 · $69k · revenue +118%
  • SD
    SAN DIEGO SOCIETY OF NATURAL HISTORY
    6× · 2017–2025 · $68k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • IU
    IONA UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +26%
  • TF
    Trees for Health Garden
    one grant, 2017 · $17k
  • SD
    SAN DIEGO MUSEUM OF MAN DBA MUSEUM OF US
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue -9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
2
Wholistic Health U
—
3
American Academy of Sciences and Letters Inc

The American Academy of Sciences and Letters (AASL) promotes scholarship and honors outstanding achievement in the arts, sciences, and learned professions. It encourages the fruitful exchange of ideas within academia and society at large…

Education
4
The Law & Humanities Institute
—
5
Science for Monks
Science & Tech
6
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
7
Paradox Science Institute
Science & Tech
8
Liberty and Health Alliance

To serve humanity through the promotion of medical freedom and the uncensored liberty to speak without recrimination while upholding Gods methods as the best means of optimizing physical, mental, and spiritual health.

Religion
9
Academy of Integrative Health & Medicine

The Academy of Integrative Health & Medicine (AIHM) is a global interprofessional integrative health association working to transform healthcare body, mind, spirt, community & planet. AIHM is the leading professional organization for the…

Health
10
Institute of Human Origins
—
11
Design Forward Alliance

Advocating for Human-Centered Design as a regional approach to improve economic, social, and civic life in our community.Design Forward Alliance is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit dedicated to leveraging the power of design to drive social impact.…

Community Improvement
12
International Society for Evolution Medicine&Public Health C/O P Turner
Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Diego Museum of Man Dba Museum of Us; the most unlike its peers is TrueNorth Health Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/25
Grantees still filing
11/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Center for Inquiry International: $727,456 · OtherCenter for Inquiry InternationalSan Diego State University: $410,000 · OtherSan Diego State UniversitySusan G Komen 3-Day for the Cure: $114,363 · OtherSusan G Komen 3-Day for the CureThomas Paine National Historical As: $101,500 · OtherThomas Paine National Historical AsPRADER-WILLI SYNDROME ASSOCIATION (USA): $69,000 · Other+24 more: $422,136 · Other+24 moreNATIONAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION: $110,000 · HealthTrueNorth Health Foundation: $30,000 · HealthOPTIONS SAVE LIVES: $13,000 · HealthTHE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $143,000 · PhilanthropySAN DIEGO SOCIETY OF NATURAL HISTORY: $67,874 · Arts & CultureThomas Paine Memorial Association Inc: $35,000 · Arts & CultureTHOMAS PAINE SOCIETY OF PASADENA: $20,000 · Arts & CultureSAN DIEGO MUSEUM OF MAN DBA MUSEUM OF US: $10,000 · Arts & CulturePLANT POWERED METRO NEW YORK INC: $35,000 · Food & NutritionMAMA'S KITCHEN: $23,500 · Food & NutritionIONA UNIVERSITY: $25,000 · EducationSAN DIEGO PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $20,000 · EducationSpecial Delivery San Diego: $5,000 · EducationSan Diego Parks Foundation: $40,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,844,455Health$153,000Philanthropy$143,000Arts & Culture$132,874Food & Nutrition$58,500Education$50,000Recreation & Sports$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $143,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION: $110,000 over 7y, 6.5% of budgetPRADER-WILLI SYNDROME ASSOCIATION (USA): $69,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetSAN DIEGO SOCIETY OF NATURAL HISTORY: $67,874 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMENLO COLLEGE: $58,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAtheists United: $52,500 over 3y, 5.8% of budgetSan Diego Parks Foundation: $40,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetAMERICAN ATHEISTS INC: $35,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetPLANT POWERED METRO NEW YORK INC: $35,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetTrueNorth Health Foundation: $30,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetTHE AMERICAN HUMANIST ASSOCIATION: $25,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetIONA UNIVERSITY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGirls on the Run of San Diego: $24,000 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetMAMA'S KITCHEN: $23,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTHOMAS PAINE SOCIETY OF PASADENA: $20,000 over 3y, 31% of budgetSAN DIEGO PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetOPTIONS SAVE LIVES: $13,000 over 2y, 8.6% of budgetSAN DIEGO MUSEUM OF MAN DBA MUSEUM OF US: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSpecial Delivery San Diego: $5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetANIMAL PROTECTION LEAGUE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHUMANIST SOCIETY OF GREATER PHOENIX INC: $2,500 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetHumanist Community of Central Ohio: $2,500 over 1y, 19% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds PRADER-WILLI SYNDROME ASSOCIATION (USA) ↗
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO SOCIETY OF NATURAL HISTORY ↗
  • Who funds MENLO COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Atheists United ↗
  • Who funds CAMP QUEST INC ↗
  • Who funds San Diego Parks Foundation ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ATHEISTS INC ↗
  • Who funds Thomas Paine Memorial Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds PLANT POWERED METRO NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds TrueNorth Health Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN HUMANIST ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds IONA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Girls on the Run of San Diego ↗
  • Who funds MAMA'S KITCHEN ↗
  • Who funds THOMAS PAINE SOCIETY OF PASADENA ↗
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OPTIONS SAVE LIVES ↗
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO MUSEUM OF MAN DBA MUSEUM OF US ↗
  • Who funds Special Delivery San Diego ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL PROTECTION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds THE HUMANIST INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds HUMANIST SOCIETY OF GREATER PHOENIX INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Stiefel Freethought FoundationDE17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Stiefel Freethought Foundation · Samuel I & John Henry Fox Foundation · Pratt Memorial Fund · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · The San Diego Foundation · Heller Foundation of San Diego · The Parker Foundation · The Cushman Foundation · Price Philanthropies Foundation · The Conrad Prebys Foundation · The Nordson Corporation Foundation · Sempra Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Johnson James Hervey Char Ed Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Johnson James Hervey Char Ed Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Johnson James Hervey Char Ed Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Johnson James Hervey Char Ed Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Johnson James Hervey Char Ed’s filings →

    More from the funding graph