Skip to content

· Private foundation

Johnson Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$6k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$125kInternational$51kEducation$32kHealth$7kRecreation & Sports$3kYouth Development$2kArts & Culture$700Civil Rights$250Other$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
5
States reached
$222k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KIDS AROUND THE WORLD$1,650
SWEDISH AMERICAN HOSPITAL$500
ROCKFORD UNIVERSITY$500
DAVID COOK FOUNDATION$500
BACK2BACK MINISTRIES$500
AWANA CLUBS INTERNATIONAL$500
JUDSON UNIVERSITY$500
IREF$500
OPERATION MOBILIZATION$250
ROCK RIVER CHAPLAINS ASSOCIATION$250
GLOBAL OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%ROCK RIVER CHAPLAINS ASSOCIATION: $500 → 15%ROCK RIVER CHAPLAINS' ASSOCIATION: $250 → 15%ROCK RIVER CHAPLAINS' ASSOCIATION: $250 → 15%ROCK RIVER CHAPLAINS ASSOCIATION: $250 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
WI
OH
CA
CO
MS
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$214k · 20 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
10

Total granted

$214k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+84%

Still filing today

60%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
ReligionYouth DevelopmentEducationInternationalCommunity ImprovementRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KA
    KIDS AROUND THE WORLD INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $49k · revenue +86%
  • RU
    ROCKFORD UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2017–2025 · $19k · revenue +5%
  • JU
    JUDSON UNIVERSITY A BAPTIST INSTITUTION
    5× · 2020–2025 · $13k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • CC
    CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INC
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • NC
    NORTH CENTRAL NEWFOUNDLAND CLUB
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $300
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
2
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
3
Rockford Christian Education Association

To challenge young people to know christ as lord, apply god's truth in all areas of life, love others sacrifically, and achieve the highest level of knowledge and skill in order to serve god and others

Education
4
Reformed University Inc

Provide education in theology, divinity, religious education, ministerial training, business and organizational leadership.

Education
5
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
6
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
7
Bluesky Global Ministries Inc

Bluesky global ministries' vision is to see the multinational community of nairobi, kenya, spiritually transformed and equipped to influence the world for god's glory. we pursue this by building relationships through adventure, using three…

Religion
8
Ason International Inc

Assisting national Christian leaders around the world.

Human Services
9
Global Scholars

Global scholars exists so that christian academics are adequately equipped to have a redemptive influence among their students, colleagues, universities and disciplines, at a reasonable cost.

—
10
Blue Letter Bible

The specific purpose of this corporation is to present a biblical, christian ministry of the gospel, hope, encouragement and strength to as many people as possible. the intent of those who will conduct this corporation's work is to present…

—
11
Biglife International Inc

Biglife international inc. empowers believers worldwide to reach and disciple their own people for jesus christ.

Recreation & Sports
12
Christian Leaders for Africa Inc

Christian leaders from africa promotes christian theological training & education of local leaders in kenya and throughout africa. it invests in undergraduate, masters, and phd scholarships, faculty support for african professors and…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Global Outreach International Inc; the most unlike its peers is Lemonaid Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
12/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BIBLES FOR KIDS: $75,000 · ReligionBIBLES FOR KIDSDAVID C COOK: $16,500 · ReligionDAVID C COOK+3 more: $3,647 · ReligionKIDS AROUND THE WORLD INC: $48,561 · Youth DevelopmentKIDS AROUND THE WORLD INC+1 more: $1,500 · Youth DevelopmentFOREST CITY CHURCH: $15,000 · OtherFOREST CITY CHURCHCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST: $6,900 · OtherCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR C…DAVID COOK FOUNDATION: $4,000 · OtherDAVID COOK FOUNDATIO…SwedishAmerican Health Foundation: $3,500 · OtherSwedishAmerican Heal…CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INC: $3,000 · OtherCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR C…NORTH CENTRAL NEWFOUNDLAND CLUB: $2,500 · OtherNORTH CENTRAL NEWFOU…+14 more: $5,143 · Other+14 moreROCKFORD UNIVERSITY: $19,000 · EducationROCKFORD UNIVERS…JUDSON UNIVERSITY A BAPTIST INSTITUTION: $12,500 · EducationJUDSON UNIVERSIT…SwedishAmerican Hospital: $3,000 · HealthROCK RIVER CHAPLAINS ASSOCIATION: $1,250 · Human ServicesONE COLLECTIVE: $500 · InternationalGLOBAL OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL INC: $250 · InternationalWORLD VISION INC: $100 · International
Religion$95,147Youth Development$50,061Other$40,043Education$31,500Health$3,000Human Services$1,250International$850

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBIBLES FOR KIDS: $75,000 over 3y, 93% of budgetKIDS AROUND THE WORLD INC: $48,561 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetROCKFORD UNIVERSITY: $19,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDAVID C COOK: $16,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJUDSON UNIVERSITY A BAPTIST INSTITUTION: $12,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSwedishAmerican Health Foundation: $3,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSwedishAmerican Hospital: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBack 2 Back Ministries Inc: $2,947 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetROCK HOUSE KIDS: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetROCK RIVER CHAPLAINS ASSOCIATION: $1,250 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetLEMONAID FUND: $600 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetONE COLLECTIVE: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAWANA CLUBS INTERNATIONAL AND AFFILIATES: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEAST BAY SANCTUARY COVENANT: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Ministry International Inc: $200 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BIBLES FOR KIDS ↗
  • Who funds KIDS AROUND THE WORLD INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCKFORD UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds DAVID C COOK ↗
  • Who funds JUDSON UNIVERSITY A BAPTIST INSTITUTION ↗
  • Who funds SwedishAmerican Health Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SwedishAmerican Hospital ↗
  • Who funds Back 2 Back Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds ROCK HOUSE KIDS ↗
  • Who funds ROCK RIVER CHAPLAINS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds LEMONAID FUND ↗
  • Who funds ONE COLLECTIVE ↗
  • Who funds AWANA CLUBS INTERNATIONAL AND AFFILIATES ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds EAST BAY SANCTUARY COVENANT ↗
  • Who funds Children's Ministry International Inc ↗
  • Who funds ROCKFORD RAPTORS SOCCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Christian Community Foundation IncCO14.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Christian Community Foundation Inc · Guy Reno Family Foundation · Rydell Family Foundation · Bergstrom Inc Charitable Foundation Xxxxx2008 · Community Foundation of Northern IL · Baird Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Verizon Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Johnson Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Johnson Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Johnson Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Johnson Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Johnson Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph