Skip to content

· Public charity

Johnson County Housing Coalition Inc

The organization has ceased operations and is working towards dissolution.

$423k
Granted FY2022
5
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$180k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2022.

Human Services$2.0MCommunity Improvement$525kEmployment$175kCrime & Legal$164kHousing & Shelter$50kReligion$40kFood & Nutrition$20kOther$0
02FY2022 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$64,317
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROJECT 10 20 INC$180,000
SUNFLOWER HOUSE$64,317
SAFEHOME$64,317
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NORTHEAST KANSAS$64,317
NCIRCLE$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–22, $644k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SAFEHOME: $400k → 5%SAFEHOME: $64k → 5%PROJECT 10 20 INC: $180k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

38%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 4 repeat orgs$1.8M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against -72% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2022, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
7

Total granted

$1.1M
$1.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
-72%

Still filing today

100%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $180k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’22
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SI
    SAFEHOME INC
    2× · 2019–2022 · $464k · revenue +34%
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NORTHEAST KANSAS INC
    2× · 2019–2022 · $304k · revenue +26%
  • NI
    NCircle Inc
    2× · 2019–2022 · $175k · revenue +190% · 79% of their budget

Funded once

  • SA
    SALVATIONS ARMY OLATHE CORPS
    one grant, 2019 · $1.0M
  • AN
    ARGENTINE NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT ASSOC
    one grant, 2019 · $400k · revenue -79% · 64% of their budget
  • UC
    UNITED COMMUNITY SERVICES OF JO CO INC
    one grant, 2019 · $125k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
North Central Kansas Housing Opportunities Inc
Community Improvement
2
Kansas Recovery Network
Health
3
Safe House Inc

S.a.f.e. house is a community based non-profit organization committed to stop abuse in the family environment by providing a comprehensive approach to end domestic violence that includes crisis intervention, safe shelter, counseling,…

Human Services
4
Shelter House Community Shelter and Transition Services

Through shelter and housing, advocacy and supportive services, our mission is to prevent and end homelessness in our community.

—
5
Hope House Inc

Break the cycle of domestic violence by providing safe refuge and supportive services

Human Services
6
Safehouse Denver Inc

Safehouse denver assists adult, children, and youth in reclaiming their right to a life free from domestic violence. the agency provides a broad spectrum of culturally competent, trauma-informed services, including but not limited to,…

Human Services
7
Marys Homes Inc

Recovery home

Housing & Shelter
8
Casa of Johnson County Inc

Recruit and train community volunteers to speak out for abused and neglected children in court proceedings so that they can be permanently placed in a safe, nuturing enviroment as quickly as possible.

Crime & Legal
9
Safe Nesttemporary Assistance for

Safe nest's mission is to provide comprehensive, collaborative, and innovative services for everyone affected by domestic and sexual violence while passionatley working to end this shared epidemic.

Human Services
10
Grace Recovery Homes Inc
Health
11
Julia Greeley Home Inc

Julia greeley home, inc. serves single unaccompanied women in the denver metro area between the ages of 18 and 64 who are struggling with chronic or repeated homelessness. the program fulfills existing gaps between overnight short term…

Housing & Shelter
12
New Covenant Safe Haven

New Covenant Safe Haven is a Christian-based organization committed to uplifting and supporting individuals and families living in poverty within our community. Our primary mission is to provide essential services such as temporary shelter…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Safehome Inc; the most unlike its peers is Project 10 20 Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SALVATIONS ARMY OLATHE CORPS: $1,002,500 · OtherSALVATIONS ARMY OLATHE CORPSCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NORTHEAST KANSAS INC: $304,317 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NORTHEAST KANSAS INCUNITED COMMUNITY SERVICES OF JO CO INC: $125,000 · OtherUNITED COMMUNITY SERVICES OF JO CO INC+3 more: $80,000 · OtherSAFEHOME INC: $464,317 · Human ServicesSAFEHOME INCPROJECT 10 20 INC: $180,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT 10 20 INCARGENTINE NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT ASSOC: $400,000 · Housing & ShelterARGENTINE NEIGHBO…RESTART INC: $50,000 · Housing & ShelterRESTART INCNCircle Inc: $175,000 · Crime & LegalNCircle IncSUNFLOWER HOUSE INC: $164,317 · Crime & LegalSUNFLOWER HOU…
Other$1,511,817Human Services$644,317Housing & Shelter$450,000Crime & Legal$339,317

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAFEHOME INC: $464,317 over 2y, 10% of budgetARGENTINE NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT ASSOC: $400,000 over 1y, 64% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NORTHEAST KANSAS INC: $304,317 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetPROJECT 10 20 INC: $180,000 over 1y, 53% of budgetNCircle Inc: $175,000 over 2y, 79% of budgetSUNFLOWER HOUSE INC: $164,317 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetRESTART INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSHAWNEE MISSION MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 73% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Kansas City Community FoundationMO15× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · After the Harvest · R a Long Foundation 600 Plaza West Bldg · Oppenstein Brothers Foundation · The H & R Block Foundation · Health Forward Foundation · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · The Sunderland Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Johnson County Housing Coalition Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Johnson County Housing Coalition Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Johnson County Housing Coalition Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Johnson County Housing Coalition Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Johnson County Housing Coalition’s filings →

    More from the funding graph