Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Johnson County Housing Coalition Inc

The organization has ceased operations and is working towards dissolution.

$423k
Granted FY2022
5
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$180k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192022.

Human Services$2.0MCommunity Improvement$525kEmployment$175kCrime & Legal$164kHousing & Shelter$50kReligion$40kFood & Nutrition$20kOther$0
02FY2022 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$64,317
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROJECT 10 20 INC$180,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NORTHEAST KANSAS$64,317
SAFEHOME$64,317
SUNFLOWER HOUSE$64,317
NCIRCLE$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–22, $644k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SAFEHOME: $400k → 5%SAFEHOME: $64k → 5%PROJECT 10 20 INC: $180k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

38%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 4 repeat orgs$1.8M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against -72% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2022, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
7

Total granted

$1.1M
$1.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
-72%

Still filing today

100%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $180k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’22
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SI
    SAFEHOME INC
    2× · 2019–2022 · $464k · revenue +34%
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NORTHEAST KANSAS INC
    2× · 2019–2022 · $304k · revenue +26%
  • NI
    NCircle Inc
    2× · 2019–2022 · $175k · revenue +190% · 79% of their budget

Funded once

  • SA
    SALVATIONS ARMY OLATHE CORPS
    one grant, 2019 · $1.0M
  • AN
    ARGENTINE NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT ASSOC
    one grant, 2019 · $400k · revenue -79% · 64% of their budget
  • UC
    UNITED COMMUNITY SERVICES OF JO CO INC
    one grant, 2019 · $125k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
North Central Kansas Housing Opportunities Inc
Community Improvement
2
Kansas Recovery Network
Health
3
Safe House Inc

S.a.f.e. house is a community based non-profit organization committed to stop abuse in the family environment by providing a comprehensive approach to end domestic violence that includes crisis intervention, safe shelter, counseling,…

Human Services
4
Shelter House Community Shelter and Transition Services

Through shelter and housing, advocacy and supportive services, our mission is to prevent and end homelessness in our community.

5
Hope House Inc

Break the cycle of domestic violence by providing safe refuge and supportive services

Human Services
6
Safehouse Denver Inc

Safehouse denver assists adult, children, and youth in reclaiming their right to a life free from domestic violence. the agency provides a broad spectrum of culturally competent, trauma-informed services, including but not limited to,…

Human Services
7
Marys Homes Inc

Recovery home

Housing & Shelter
8
Casa of Johnson County Inc

Recruit and train community volunteers to speak out for abused and neglected children in court proceedings so that they can be permanently placed in a safe, nuturing enviroment as quickly as possible.

Crime & Legal
9
Safe Nesttemporary Assistance for

Safe nest's mission is to provide comprehensive, collaborative, and innovative services for everyone affected by domestic and sexual violence while passionatley working to end this shared epidemic.

Human Services
10
Grace Recovery Homes Inc
Health
11
Julia Greeley Home Inc

Julia greeley home, inc. serves single unaccompanied women in the denver metro area between the ages of 18 and 64 who are struggling with chronic or repeated homelessness. the program fulfills existing gaps between overnight short term…

Housing & Shelter
12
New Covenant Safe Haven

New Covenant Safe Haven is a Christian-based organization committed to uplifting and supporting individuals and families living in poverty within our community. Our primary mission is to provide essential services such as temporary shelter…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Safehome Inc and the most unlike its peers is Project 10 20 Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SALVATIONS ARMY OLATHE CORPS — $1,002,500 · OtherSALVATIONS ARMY OLATHE CORPSCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NORTHEAST KANSAS INC — $304,317 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NORTHEAST KANSAS INCUNITED COMMUNITY SERVICES OF JO CO INC — $125,000 · OtherUNITED COMMUNITY SERVICES OF JO CO INC+3 more — $80,000 · OtherSAFEHOME INC — $464,317 · Human ServicesSAFEHOME INCPROJECT 10 20 INC — $180,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT 10 20 INCARGENTINE NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT ASSOC — $400,000 · Housing & ShelterARGENTINE NEIGHBO…RESTART INC — $50,000 · Housing & ShelterRESTART INCNCircle Inc — $175,000 · Crime & LegalNCircle IncSUNFLOWER HOUSE INC — $164,317 · Crime & LegalSUNFLOWER HOU…
Other$1,511,817Human Services$644,317Housing & Shelter$450,000Crime & Legal$339,317

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSAFEHOME INC — $464,317 over 2y, 10% of budgetARGENTINE NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT ASSOC — $400,000 over 1y, 64% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NORTHEAST KANSAS INC — $304,317 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetPROJECT 10 20 INC — $180,000 over 1y, 53% of budgetNCircle Inc — $175,000 over 2y, 79% of budgetSUNFLOWER HOUSE INC — $164,317 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetRESTART INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSHAWNEE MISSION MEALS ON WHEELS INC — $20,000 over 1y, 73% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Kansas City Community FoundationMO15× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · After the Harvest · R a Long Foundation 600 Plaza West Bldg · Oppenstein Brothers Foundation · The H & R Block Foundation · Health Forward Foundation · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · The Sunderland Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Johnson County Housing Coalition Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Johnson County Housing Coalition Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Johnson County Housing Coalition Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph