Skip to content

· Private foundation

John T Vucurevich Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$7.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
59
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$3.1MPhilanthropy$2.8MEducation$1.3MYouth Development$635kCrime & Legal$575kHealth$560kCommunity Improvement$349kRecreation & Sports$300kOther$0
02FY2024 · 59 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 59 grants below total $5,651,547, the rows itemized in this filing. The $7,488,047 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,836,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $352k
  • $50k–250k29 grants · $3.0M
  • $250k+5 grants · $2.3M
$50,000
Median grant
—
States reached
$152M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Black Hills Area Community Foundation$1,000,000
Black Hills Area Community Foundation$500,000
Behavior Management Systems dba West River Mental Health$287,500
Black Hills Special Services Cooperative$252,000
Black Hills Area Community Foundation$250,000
United Way of the Black Hills$181,000
Rapid City Club for Boys Inc$176,000
Action for the Betterment of Our Community$150,000
Black Hills Area Community Foundation$150,000
Literacy Council of the Black Hills$150,000
Volunteers of America Northern Rockies$150,000
Wellfully$150,000
Western South Dakota Community Action$150,000
South Dakota Community Foundation$150,000
South Dakota State University Foundation$140,000
02Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

29%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.1M · 17 repeat orgs$9.9M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +78% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 35 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
47

Total granted

$4.1M
$4.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+78%
+10%

Still filing today

53%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 3% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5.5M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WI
    WELLSPRING INC
    2× · 2017–2023 · $1.1M · revenue +43% · 33% of their budget
  • SD
    SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2023 · $501k · revenue +78%
  • WD
    WESTERN DAKOTA VOCATIONAL TECHNICAL FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2017–2023 · $400k · revenue +105%

Funded once

  • RC
    RAPID CITY Y M C A
    one grant, 2017 · $1.1M · revenue +18%
  • WA
    WORKING AGAINST VIOLENCE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $380k · revenue +10%
  • O
    ONEHEART
    one grant, 2023 · $305k · revenue -20%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Feeding South Dakota

To eliminate hunger in south dakota.

Food & Nutrition
2
Dakotabilities Inc

Together, we create a warm and welcoming community enriching the lives of those we support.

Human Services
3
Sd Association of Healthcare Organizations

Advancing healthy communities through a unified voice across the health care continuum.

—
4
Credit Union Association of the Dakotas

The association works to promote member credit unions as being safe and sound institutions for insured deposits, responsible lending, and the best place for consumers to receive financial services.

—
5
South Dakota Rural Electric Association

To serve the rural electric cooperatives in south dakota, to promote the effective development of rural electrification in south dakota on a cooperative, non-profit basis.

—
6
Northeast South Dakota Area Health Education Center

To create and strengthen partnerships that cultivate a robust health workforce for rural and underserved communities in south dakota.

Education
7
North Dakota University System Foundation

The function of the north dakota university system foundation is to support, enrich, advance and improve higher education in the state of north dakota, and to assist its students, faculty and staff.

Philanthropy
8
State University of Iowa Alumni Association

Our mission is to strengthen the university of iowa through alumni engagement. we do this through our communications, alumni programs, and events.

—
9
South Dakota Dental Association

It is the mission of the south dakota dental association to promote the art and science of dentistry and the oral health of the public; educate the public on the benefits of quality preventative and restorative dentistry as provided by the…

—
10
South Dakota Biotechnology Association

A south dakota alliance dedicated to the development of biotechnology industries through expansion of bio-based research, investment, education, advocacy, funding, education, infrastructure development, and promotion.

Community Improvement
11
Dakota County Technical College Foundation

The dctc foundation's mission is to foster student success and elevate the academic experience at dakota county technical college by securing resources through strong partnerships with employers, alumni, and the community.

—
12
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Black Hills Area Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Muscular Dystrophy Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 100 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/39
Grantees still filing
26/39
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Black Hills Area Community Foundation: $1,979,647 · OtherBlack Hills Area Community FoundationCATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES: $800,264 · OtherCATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICESWESTERN DAKOTA VOCATIONAL TECHNICAL FOUNDATION INC: $400,000 · OtherWORKING AGAINST VIOLENCE INC: $380,000 · Other+76 more: $6,177,239 · Other+76 moreRAPID CITY Y M C A: $1,075,000 · Human ServicesRAPID CITY Y M C …WELLSPRING INC: $1,055,000 · Human ServicesWELLSPRING INCNORTHERN HILLS ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN: $75,000 · Human Services+1 more: $25,000 · Human ServicesSOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $501,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA FOUNDATION: $145,000 · EducationSDSM&T CENTER FOR ALUMNI RELATIONS & ADVANCEMENT: $95,000 · EducationOGLALA LAKOTA COLLEGE: $80,000 · EducationBLACK HILLS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $75,000 · EducationPARDEEVILLE BULLDOG SUPPORT FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Education+1 more: $25,000 · EducationUNITED WAY OF THE BLACK HILLS: $332,500 · PhilanthropyBLACK HILLS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $247,840 · PhilanthropyRAPID CITY CLUB FOR BOYS INC: $151,000 · Youth DevelopmentCHEYENNE RIVER YOUTH PROJECT INC: $125,500 · Youth DevelopmentLIFEWAYS INC: $48,880 · Youth DevelopmentONEHEART: $305,000 · Housing & Shelter+1 more: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterTHUNDER VALLEY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COR: $100,000 · Community ImprovementELEVATE FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · Community Improvement
Other$9,737,150Human Services$2,230,000Education$971,000Philanthropy$580,340Youth Development$325,380Housing & Shelter$315,000Community Improvement$150,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRAPID CITY Y M C A: $1,075,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetWELLSPRING INC: $1,055,000 over 2y, 33% of budgetSOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $501,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetWESTERN DAKOTA VOCATIONAL TECHNICAL FOUNDATION INC: $400,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetWORKING AGAINST VIOLENCE INC: $380,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE BLACK HILLS: $332,500 over 2y, 7.8% of budgetONEHEART: $305,000 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetBLACK HILLS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $247,840 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetHELPLINE CENTER INC: $182,420 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetRAPID CITY CLUB FOR BOYS INC: $151,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA FOUNDATION: $145,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF ROSEBUD: $130,000 over 2y, 6.8% of budgetCHEYENNE RIVER YOUTH PROJECT INC: $125,500 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA NORTHERN ROCKIES: $125,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBIG BROTHERS AND BIG SISTERS O: $110,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetACTION FOR BETTERMENT OF COMMUNITY: $110,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetTHUNDER VALLEY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COR: $100,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetOGLALA LAKOTA COLLEGE: $80,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRAPID CITY FINE ARTS COUNCIL INC: $75,000 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetBLACK HILLS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetNORTHERN HILLS ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN: $75,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetBENCHMARK DATA LABS: $64,240 over 1y, 26% of budgetFORK REAL COMMUNITY CAFE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetPARDEEVILLE BULLDOG SUPPORT FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 64% of budgetLIFEWAYS INC: $48,880 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetFriends of South Dakota Public Broadcasting: $40,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetLOVE INC OF THE BLACK HILLS: $38,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetWESTERN SOUTH DAKOTA SENIOR SERVICES INC: $26,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetABBOTT HOUSE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSOUTH DAKOTA EDUCATION EQUITY COALITION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSOUTH DAKOTA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGOOD SHEPHERD CLINIC INC: $10,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetExcellence in Computer Programming, Inc.: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RAPID CITY Y M C A ↗
  • Who funds WELLSPRING INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN DAKOTA VOCATIONAL TECHNICAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WORKING AGAINST VIOLENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE BLACK HILLS ↗
  • Who funds ONEHEART ↗
  • Who funds BLACK HILLS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HELPLINE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds RAPID CITY CLUB FOR BOYS INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF ROSEBUD ↗
  • Who funds CHEYENNE RIVER YOUTH PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA NORTHERN ROCKIES ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS AND BIG SISTERS O ↗
  • Who funds ACTION FOR BETTERMENT OF COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds THUNDER VALLEY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COR ↗
  • Who funds SDSM&T CENTER FOR ALUMNI RELATIONS & ADVANCEMENT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

South Dakota Community FoundationSD45.4× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: South Dakota Community Foundation · Black Hills Area Community Foundation · United Way of the Black Hills · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Synchrony Foundation · Gwendolyn L Stearns Foundation Inc · The Bush Foundation · Sioux Falls Area Community Foundation Inc · Clarkson Family Foundation Pioneer Bank & Trust Trustee · American Gift Fund · Midcontinent Foundation · Crazy Horse Memorial Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to John T Vucurevich Foundation?

Find your warmest path to John T Vucurevich Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 100 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on John T Vucurevich’s filings →

More from the funding graph