Skip to content

· Private foundation

John Sluck & Anita Sluck Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$136k
Granted FY2024still arriving
38
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$225kHealth$190kPublic Benefit$117kEducation$111kAnimals$65kHuman Services$64kRecreation & Sports$58kFood & Nutrition$53kOther$0
02FY2024 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k37 grants · $124k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$3,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOSPICE OF TEXARKANA$10,000
PACT PANTHERS PTO$6,000
ST MARY'S ORTHODOX CATHEDRAL$6,000
USA CLAY TARGET LEAGUE$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
TAYLOR COMMUNITY LIBRARY$5,000
TEAM KOPACZ INC$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
DISBLED VETERANS REST CAMP$5,000
INVISIBLE WOUNDS PROJECT$5,000
BIRCHWOOD AREA FOOD PANTRY INC$5,000
AMERICAN ACCOUNTABILITY FOUNDATION$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
LIBERTAS INSTITUTE$4,000
COMMON HOPE$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%BLOOM EARLY LEARNING & CHILD CARE: $2k → 11%SHARING AND CARING HANDS INC: $5k → 11%RED CROSS: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
WI
NY
SD
PA
CA
UT
VA
MD
AZ
AR
DC
LA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$863k · 42 repeat orgs$165k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +53% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

42 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

42
32

Total granted

$863k
$120k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+29%

Still filing today

55%
34%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthPublic BenefitHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HO
    HOSPICE OF TEXARKANA
    7× · 2018–2024 · $130k · revenue +8%
  • JUDICIAL WATCH INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $38k · revenue +141%
  • THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $35k · revenue +63%

Funded once

  • TF
    TEAMSTERS FOOD SHELF
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • TR
    TEXARKANA REGIONAL ARTS & HUMANITIE
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • TJ
    TEAMSTERS JOINT COUNCIL 32
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
2
Federation for American Immigration Reform

The federation for american immigration reform's (fair) mission is to educate the public about the economic, sociological, environmental, demographic and other effects of mass immigration to the united states.

International
3
The Liberal Patriot Inc

The liberal patriot (tlp) is a digital newsletter focused on american politics and public policy. tlp aims to provide readers with honest analysis and original commentary to help advance a vital center perspective in american life.

Civil Rights
4
Guttmacher Institute Inc

The institute is a leading research and policy organization committed to advancing sexual and reproductive health and rights in the united states and globally.

—
5
Partnership for Public Service Inc

Making our government work better is a daunting task, and we are a small organization seeking to transform a government that employs millions of civilians and manages trillions of dollars in taxpayer revenue needed to protect public…

Employment
6
Committee to Protect Journalists Inc

The committee to protect journalists promotes press freedom worldwide and defends the right of journalists to report the news safely and without fear of reprisal. cpj ensures the free flow of news and commentary by taking action wherever…

Civil Rights
7
Project Hope - the People-to-People Health Foundation Inc

To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they…

International
8
Free Press

Free press was created to give people a voice in the crucial decisions that shape our media. we believe that positive social change, racial justice and meaningful engagement in public life require equitable access to technology, diverse…

Arts & Culture
9
2020 Mom Policy Center for Maternal

The policy center is improving maternal mental health outcomes through closing gaps in care delivery, including improving detection and access to evidence-based and informed clinical and community-based care. the policy center has been…

Health
10
Tax Foundation

To achieve simple, sensible tax policy at the federal and state levels by producing and disseminating basic information and economically principled analysis of tax policy issues and the size of the tax burden borne by americans at all…

Public Benefit
11
Just Capital Foundation Inc

Just capital's mission is to build a more just economy that works for all americans by helping companies improve how they serve all their stakeholders - workers, customers, communities, the environment, and shareholders - as defined by the…

Social Science
12
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Accountability Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Friends of Ronald Reagan Sp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 90 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
39/41
Grantees still filing
29/41
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $80,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST MARY'S ORTHODOX CATHEDRAL: $44,000 · OtherST MARY'S ORTHODOX CATHEDRALIMRC NEW MODEL HIGH SCHOOL: $38,000 · OtherIMRC NEW MODEL HIGH SCHOOLPROJECT VERITAS: $35,000 · OtherPROJECT VERITASBROOKLYN PARK LADY LIONS: $35,000 · OtherBROOKLYN PARK LADY LIONSIndividual grant recipient: $28,000 · OtherST TIKHON'S OF ZADONSK: $26,000 · OtherTEAM KOPACZ INC: $25,000 · OtherWESTGATE CHURCH: $23,000 · Other+61 more: $291,015 · Other+61 moreHOSPICE OF TEXARKANA: $130,000 · HealthHOSPICE OF TEXAR…Invisible Wounds Project Inc: $10,000 · HealthInvisible Wounds…American Heart Association Inc: $6,000 · Health+2 more: $7,000 · HealthJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $38,000 · Public BenefitJUDICIAL WA…THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $35,000 · Public BenefitTHE HERITAG…CATO INSTITUTE: $16,000 · Public BenefitCATO INSTIT…Libertas Network: $15,000 · Public BenefitLibertas Ne…AMERICAN ACCOUNTABILITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Public BenefitRESCUED PETS ARE WONDERFUL: $48,500 · AnimalsPAWSITIVELY FOR THE ANIMALS: $8,000 · AnimalsBIRCHWOOD AREA FOOD PANTRY INC: $38,000 · Food & NutritionVikings Helping Vikings Inc: $15,000 · EducationTEE IT UP FOR THE TROOPS INC: $10,500 · EducationSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $5,000 · EducationSage Academy Charter School Charter School No 4087: $3,000 · EducationSECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION: $8,000 · Civil RightsLIVE ACTION: $6,000 · Civil RightsMINNESOTA RIGHT TO LIFE: $4,000 · Civil Rights
Other$625,015Health$153,000Public Benefit$109,000Animals$56,500Food & Nutrition$38,000Education$33,500Civil Rights$18,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOSPICE OF TEXARKANA: $130,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetRESCUED PETS ARE WONDERFUL: $48,500 over 5y, 5.4% of budgetBIRCHWOOD AREA FOOD PANTRY INC: $38,000 over 8y, 3.9% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $38,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT VERITAS: $35,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE: $16,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVikings Helping Vikings Inc: $15,000 over 3y, 25% of budgetLibertas Network: $15,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCAPABLE PARTNERS INC: $14,000 over 4y, 5.0% of budgetTEE IT UP FOR THE TROOPS INC: $10,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetInvisible Wounds Project Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetWATERSPRINGS RANCH INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBELLIS: $8,000 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetSECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUSA CLAY TARGET LEAGUE: $8,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLIVE ACTION: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMON HOPE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHARING AND CARING HANDS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN ACCOUNTABILITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMINNESOTA RIGHT TO LIFE: $4,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetHOPE 4 Youth: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSage Academy Charter School Charter School No 4087: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMINNESOTA PATRIOT GUARD: $3,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetALPHA NEWS: $3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetANIDASO: $2,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTHE DAILY CALLER NEWS FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY LIBRARY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN HELICOPTER MUSEUM & EDUCAT CENTER INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNAMI MINNESOTA: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOM EARLY LEARNING: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNo One Left Behind: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOSPICE OF TEXARKANA ↗
  • Who funds RESCUED PETS ARE WONDERFUL ↗
  • Who funds BIRCHWOOD AREA FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT VERITAS ↗
  • Who funds CATO INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Vikings Helping Vikings Inc ↗
  • Who funds Libertas Network ↗
  • Who funds CAPABLE PARTNERS INC ↗
  • Who funds TEE IT UP FOR THE TROOPS INC ↗
  • Who funds TWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds Invisible Wounds Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds WATERSPRINGS RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds PAWSITIVELY FOR THE ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds BELLIS ↗
  • Who funds SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds USA CLAY TARGET LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds LIVE ACTION ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Xcel Energy FoundationMN14.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Xcel Energy Foundation · Allina Health System · The US Charitable Gift Trust · The Graco Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Catholic Community Foundation of Minnesota · The Minneapolis Foundation · Donors Trust Inc · Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing · United Way Worldwide · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John Sluck & Anita Sluck Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John Sluck & Anita Sluck Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 90 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on John Sluck & Anita Sluck’s filings →

    More from the funding graph