Skip to content

· Private foundation

John R Lucash Scholarship Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$52k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$458kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k26 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
$790
Median grant
7
States reached
$912k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUTHWESTERN ILLINOIS COLLEGE$13,430
SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNVERSITY EDWARDSVILLE$6,320
SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY CARBONDALE$3,950
UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI COLUMBIA$3,160
Individual grant recipient$2,370
ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY$2,370
ILLINOIS COLLEGE$1,580
MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY$1,580
MURRAY STATE UNIVERSITY$1,580
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN INDIANA$1,580
MCKENDREE UNIVERSITY$1,580
LINDENWOOD UNIVERSITY$790
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS$790
DARKE UNIVERSITY$790
KASKASKIA COLLEGE$790
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 90% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MINNESOTA WEST FOUNDATION: $790 → 11%DARKE UNIVERSITY: $790 → 10%UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $745 → 17%LINDENWOOD UNIVERSITY: $790 → 5%KENNELWOOD ACADEMY: $745 → 9%MISSOURI BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $790 → 11%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL MISSOURI: $745 → 14%SOUTHEASTERN MISSOURI STATE: $2k → 14%MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 15%MISSOURI S AND T: $790 → 16%SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $790 → 21%WESTERN GOVERNORS UNIVERSITY: $790 → 8%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN INDIANA: $2k → 15%INDIANA UNIVERSITY: $790 → 18%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $790 → 19%ILLINOIS COLLEGE: $2k → 12%SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNVERSITY EDWARDSVILLE: $6k → 12%REND LAKE COLLEGE: $853 → 15%KASKASKIA COLLEGE: $853 → 15%MCKENDREE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 16%EASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY: $790 → 18%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $1k → 19%WESTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY: $790 → 20%SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY CARBONDALE: $4k → 23%MURRAY STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI ST LOUIS: $745 → 11%LEWIS & CLARK COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $790 → 12%KASKASKIA COLLEGE: $790 → 15%IDEAL AVIATION: $790 → 16%ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY: $1k → 19%SOUTHWESTERN ILLINOIS COLLEGE: $13k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $790 → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
MI
WY
IA
IN
OH
PA
UT
MO
KY
MD
AZ
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
LA
MS
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$398k · 44 repeat orgs$64k to everyone else

44 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
57

Total granted

$398k
$53k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+14%

Still filing today

23%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LE
    LINDENWOOD EDUCATION SYSTEM
    7× · 2017–2025 · $9k · revenue +17%
  • IC
    ILLINOIS COLLEGE
    5× · 2019–2025 · $6k · revenue +9%
  • SL
    ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2017–2025 · $6k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • SI
    SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERISITY-EDWARDSVIL
    one grant, 2021 · $7k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WEST FLORIDA
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • ST
    STATE TECHNICAL COLLEGE OF MISSOURI
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
2
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
3
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
4
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
5
University of the Ozarks

True to our christian heritage, we prepare students from diverse religious, cultural, educational and economic backgrounds to live life fully.

Education
6
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
7
Loyola University

Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…

Education
8
LaGrange College

Education - lagrange college challenges the minds and inspires the souls of its students. founded in 1831 and committed to its relationship with the united methodist church and its wesleyan and liberal arts traditions, the college supports…

Education
9
Xavier University

Xavier is a jesuit catholic university rooted in the liberal arts tradition. our mission is to educate each student intellectually, morally, and spiritually. we create learning opportunities through rigorous academic and professional…

Education
10
John Brown University

John brown university (jbu) provides christ-centered education that prepares students to honor god and serve others by developing their intellectual, spiritual, and professional lives. (continued on schedule o)jbu serves traditional…

Education
11
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
12
Roger Williams University

At Roger Williams University, students are prepared to be thinkers and doers ready to solve challenging problems with innovative solutions. RWU offers robust offerings of undergraduate, graduate and professional programs across eight…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Louis University; the most unlike its peers is Aesthetic Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 109 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/31
Grantees still filing
22/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOUTHWESTERN ILLINOIS COLLEGE: $105,272 · OtherSOUTHWESTERN ILLINOIS COLLEGEUNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI: $41,158 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MISSOURIMISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY: $26,643 · OtherMISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY: $20,120 · OtherMURRAY STATE UNIVERSITY: $17,355 · OtherSOUTHEAST MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY: $14,459 · Other+75 more: $180,413 · Other+75 moreMcKendree University: $10,537 · EducationMcKendree Uni…LINDENWOOD EDUCATION SYSTEM: $9,297 · EducationLINDENWOOD ED…ILLINOIS COLLEGE: $5,620 · EducationILLINOIS COLL…ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $5,592 · EducationST LOUIS UNIV…BRADLEY UNIVERSITY: $2,329 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $2,130 · EducationGreenville College: $1,980 · Education+21 more: $18,474 · Education+21 more
Other$405,420Education$55,959

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMcKendree University: $10,537 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLINDENWOOD EDUCATION SYSTEM: $9,297 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetILLINOIS COLLEGE: $5,620 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $5,592 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMACMURRAY COLLEGE: $4,370 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBRADLEY UNIVERSITY: $2,329 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $2,130 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGreenville College: $1,980 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMissouri Baptist University: $1,535 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDrury University: $1,469 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRanken Technical College: $1,355 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARK UNIVERSITY: $890 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFONTBONNE UNIVERSITY: $853 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAESTHETIC INSTITUTE: $853 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRhodes College: $853 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Health Sciences and Pharmacy in St Louis: $839 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAVILA UNIVERSITY: $839 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMaryville University - St Louis: $839 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSavannah College of Art and DesignInc: $839 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMINNESOTA WEST FOUNDATION: $790 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDRAKE UNIVERSITY: $790 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Dayton: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILLIAM WOODS UNIVERSITY: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFREED-HARDEMAN UNIVERSITY: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetButler University: $745 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY: $745 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNova Southeastern University Inc: $745 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLORAS COLLEGE: $745 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF EVANSVILLE: $630 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNION UNIVERSITY: $610 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds McKendree University ↗
  • Who funds LINDENWOOD EDUCATION SYSTEM ↗
  • Who funds ILLINOIS COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MACMURRAY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds BRADLEY UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Greenville College ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Folds of Honor FoundationOK25.2× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Folds of Honor Foundation · William Edgar Charitable Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · Lord Educational Fund · Missouri Colleges Fund Inc · Jack J Isgur Foundation · Council of Independent Colleges · United Way Worldwide · Charities Aid Foundation America · Louis and Temple Marsch Charitable Trust · Tammy Stratman Brown Charities · Griffin Family Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John R Lucash Scholarship Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John R Lucash Scholarship Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Nova Southeastern University Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 109 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on John R Lucash Scholarship’s filings →

More from the funding graph