Skip to content

· Private foundation

John M Wolff Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$260k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$216kHuman Services$211kCommunity Improvement$190kYouth Development$160kHousing & Shelter$115kHealth$41kEducation$35kEmployment$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $205k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
$45,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Urban League$55,000
Individual grant recipient$45,000
Rebuilding Together$45,000
St Louis Area Foodbank$45,000
Boys and Girls Club of St Louis$25,000
Bethesda Health Group$20,000
St Mary's Food Bank Alliance$15,000
WESLEY HOUSE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $105k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Bethesda Health Group: $35k → 11%Bethesda Health Group: $20k → 11%Covenant House: $40k → 21%Bethesda Health Group: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$887k · 9 repeat orgs$166k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
11

Total granted

$887k
$156k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-4%
+24%

Still filing today

67%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionEducationEmploymentHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BA
    Boys and Girls Club of St. Louis
    5× · 2021–2025 · $160k
  • SL
    ST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $145k · revenue -29%
  • UL
    URBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS
    3× · 2023–2025 · $115k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • RT
    Ranken Technical College
    one grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue +22%
  • MH
    Magdala House Foundation
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
  • TH
    Traurig House at Gaylord Hospital
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of St Louis

To bring the healing, help, and hope of jesus christ to those in need with a compassionate, caring presence. our values are dignity, hospitality, service, excellence, compassion, and joy.

Human Services
2
Commonbond Communities

Commonbond's mission is to build stable homes, strong futures and vibrant communities. as the largest nonprofit provider of affordable homes in the upper midwest, commonbond has been building and sustaining homes with services to families,…

—
3
Interfaith Residence D/B/a Doorways

See schedule oas one of the most comprehensive hiv housing programs in the nation, interfaith residence dba doorways, an interfaith organization, offers various housing options and supportive services designed to meet the diverse needs of…

Health
4
Umom New Day Centers Inc

To end family homelessness by restoring hope and rebuilding lives, so no child will ever have to sleep on the streets.

Housing & Shelter
5
Urban Triage Incorporated

Urban triage transforms culture, institutions, and communities to ensure a humane future.

Philanthropy
6
St Lukes Episcopal-Presbyterian Hospitals

We are dedicated to providing exceptional care to every patient, every time.

Health
7
St Louis Integrated Health Network

The st. louis integrated health network, through partnership and collaboration, is a healthcare intermediary building capacity across sectors to improve wellbeing by increasing access to health and social services.

Health
8
Covenant House Washington Dc

Covenant house washington, dc ("chw") provides shelter, crisis care, community services, and outreach services to youth in the washington dc area.

Human Services
9
Progress Unlimited Inc

To empower individuals to lead fulfilling and productive lives at home and in the community.

Human Services
10
Shelter House Community Shelter and Transition Services

Through shelter and housing, advocacy and supportive services, our mission is to prevent and end homelessness in our community.

—
11
St Luke's Des Peres Episcopal- Presbyterian Hospital

We are dedicated to providing exceptional care to every patient, every time.

Health
12
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Louis Area Food Bank Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Mural Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Boys and Girls Club of St. Louis: $160,000 · OtherBoys and Girls Club of St. LouisST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC: $145,000 · OtherST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INCURBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS: $115,000 · OtherURBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUISUrban League: $75,000 · OtherUrban LeagueIndividual grant recipient: $65,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMagdala House Foundation: $30,000 · OtherTraurig House at Gaylord Hospital: $25,000 · Other+5 more: $45,000 · Other+5 moreBETHESDA HEALTH GROUP INC: $85,000 · Human ServicesBETHESDA HEALTH…COVENANT HOUSE MISSOURI: $61,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE …REBUILDING TOGETHER INC: $110,000 · Housing & ShelterREBUILDING …ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $71,420 · Food & NutritionRanken Technical College: $30,000 · EducationMagdala House: $10,000 · HealthYAVAPAI REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $5,500 · HealthPROJECT CU INC: $10,000 · EmploymentAMERICAN MURAL PROJECT INC: $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$660,000Human Services$146,000Housing & Shelter$110,000Food & Nutrition$71,420Education$30,000Health$15,500Employment$10,000Arts & Culture$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC: $145,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS: $115,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER INC: $110,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetBETHESDA HEALTH GROUP INC: $85,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $71,420 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE MISSOURI: $61,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetRanken Technical College: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT CU INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN MURAL PROJECT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetMagdala House: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYAVAPAI REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $5,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds URBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER INC ↗
  • Who funds BETHESDA HEALTH GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE MISSOURI ↗
  • Who funds Ranken Technical College ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT CU INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN MURAL PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Magdala House ↗
  • Who funds YAVAPAI REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Enterprise Holdings FoundationMO11.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John M Wolff Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John M Wolff Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • American Mural Project Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on John M Wolff’s filings →

More from the funding graph