Skip to content

· Private foundation

John M and Kathy R Wright Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$133k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$91k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$133kHousing & Shelter$122kFood & Nutrition$79kHealth$30kPublic Safety & Disaster$20kHuman Services$20kEducation$17kInternational$14kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $3k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $39k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $91k
$39,150
Median grant
2
States reached
$719k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DANIEL PITINO SHELTER INC$91,000
ST STEPHEN CATHEDRAL$39,150
SUNRISE CHILDREN'S SERVICES$1,500
YOUTH FIRST$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%BOYS TOWN: $2k → 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
IN
CA
NE
KY
MD
TN
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$379k · 17 repeat orgs$71k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
17

Total granted

$379k
$68k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+9%

Still filing today

47%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHousing & ShelterInternationalHuman ServicesEducationFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DP
    DANIEL PITINO SHELTER INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $118k · revenue +130%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    3× · 2020–2024 · $12k · revenue +39%
  • GR
    GREEN RIVER AREA DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $8k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branchesgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +38%
  • AR
    AMERICAN RED CROSS
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
East Tennessee Children's Hospital Association Inc

East tennessee children's hospital is a free-standing, independent, not-for-profit pediatric health care system which serves the east tennessee region. children's hospital is certified by the state of tennessee as a comprehensive regional…

Health
2
Didi Hirsch Psychiatric Service

The roots of the los angeles didi hirsch psychiatric service dba didi hirsch mental health services ("dhmhs") extend back to the 1930s, when a group of women funded psychiatric care for people whose lives were devastated by the depression.…

Health
3
Family Service Association of Bucks County

Mission: we listen, care and help. every day. vision: a community where anyone can achieve their full potential. programs: our services treat mental health issues; reduce substance use; shelter, feed, educate and seek permanent housing for…

Human Services
4
Philhaven

Philhaven promotes hope, healing and wholeness through the provision of behavioral resources.

Health
5
Sunflower House Inc

To protect children in our community from physical and sexual abuse through education, advocacy, forensic , medical and mental health services.

Crime & Legal
6
Suncoast Center Inc

For 80 years, suncoast center, inc. has held true to its mission of "strengthening, protecting, and restoring lives for a healthy community" by providing a comprehensive range of evidence-based services that address emotional wellness,…

Health
7
Southeast Florida Behavioral Health Network Inc

Our mission is a seamless, accessible, recovery-oriented system of behavioral health care driven by consumers, providers, and other stakeholders, in which innovation and collaboration are the norm and diversified financial resources…

Health
8
St Vincent's Services Inc

For over 150 years, st. vincent's services, inc. (d/b/a heartshare st. vincent's services) has been a symbol of hope, compassion, and strength for vulnerable and under-resourced communities in new york city. (see on schedule o)

Human Services
9
Pathway Caring for Children

Our mission is to help children and families realize the possibilities of their lives through foster care, adoption, and mental health. we serve over 1,700 children and families in 14 northeast ohio counties.

Health
10
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
11
St Vincent De Paul of Baltimore Inc

To ensure that those impacted by poverty have the skills and resources to achieve their full potential.

Human Services
12
Visiting Nurse Service of New York Home Care Ii

Vns health home care is part of one of the nation's largest nonprofit home and community-based health care organizations. we help people live, age, and heal where they feel most comfortable. please refer to schedule o for additional…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc; the most unlike its peers is Father Flanagan's Boys' Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST STEPHEN CATHEDRAL: $69,750 · OtherST STEPHEN CATHEDRALDIOCESE OF OWENSBORO: $30,000 · OtherDIOCESE OF OWENSBOROOWENSBORO CATHOLIC SCHOOLS: $11,500 · OtherOWENSBORO CATHOLIC SCHOOLSAMERICAN RED CROSS: $10,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY: $10,000 · OtherOUR LADY OF LOURDES: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $7,500 · OtherPRECIOUS BLOOD CATHOLIC CHURCH: $7,500 · OtherSAINTS JOE & PAUL CATHOLIC CHURCH: $7,500 · Other+14 more: $36,999 · Other+14 moreDANIEL PITINO SHELTER INC: $117,500 · Housing & ShelterDANIEL PITINO SHELTER INCSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL COUNCIL OF LOUISVILLE INC: $4,500 · Housing & ShelterFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $71,500 · InternationalFOOD FOR THE POOR IN…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $11,500 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTI…GREEN RIVER AREA DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION INC: $7,500 · HealthTHE PETE FOUNDATION INC: $4,750 · HealthRAE OF SUNSHINE FOUNDATION INC: $4,750 · HealthYOUTH FIRST: $1,500 · HealthAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $10,000 · Human ServicesFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $2,000 · Human ServicesBEVERLYS HEARTY SLICE INC: $7,000 · Food & NutritionREACH OUT AND READ INC: $5,000 · EducationCLIFF HAGAN BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC: $1,500 · Youth Development
Other$200,749Housing & Shelter$122,000International$83,000Health$18,500Human Services$12,000Food & Nutrition$7,000Education$5,000Youth Development$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDANIEL PITINO SHELTER INC: $117,500 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $71,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $11,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEVERLYS HEARTY SLICE INC: $7,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetREACH OUT AND READ INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PETE FOUNDATION INC: $4,750 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetRAE OF SUNSHINE FOUNDATION INC: $4,750 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL COUNCIL OF LOUISVILLE INC: $4,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHL NEBLETT COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCLIFF HAGAN BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSUNRISE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH FIRST: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DANIEL PITINO SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds GREEN RIVER AREA DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BEVERLYS HEARTY SLICE INC ↗
  • Who funds REACH OUT AND READ INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PETE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds RAE OF SUNSHINE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL COUNCIL OF LOUISVILLE INC ↗
  • Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home ↗
  • Who funds HL NEBLETT COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CLIFF HAGAN BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds SUNRISE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH FIRST ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Baird Foundation IncWI18.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Baird Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Corporate Depository Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · Impact 100 - Owensboro Inc · Marilyn & William Young Charitable Foundation Inc C/O Sara Hemingway Ex Di · The Whas Crusade for Children Inc · Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · The Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John M and Kathy R Wright Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John M and Kathy R Wright Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Reach Out and Read Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to John M and Kathy R Wright Family Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to John M and Kathy R Wright Family Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on John M and Kathy R Wright Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph