Skip to content

· Private foundation

John L & Ardis J Piers Private Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$42kFood & Nutrition$6kHealth$3kHousing & Shelter$3kHuman Services$2kInternational$2kArts & Culture$800Animals$50Other$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$61k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOOK HARVEST$2,000
DEEDS FOR DEEDS$1,000
DPS FOUNDATION$1,000
URBAN MINISTRIES$527
TROSA$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $2k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$46k · 10 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +103% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
15

Total granted

$46k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+103%
+2%

Still filing today

50%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationCrime & LegalFood & NutritionHuman ServicesPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BOOK HARVEST
    3× · 2017–2019 · $4k · revenue +463%
  • WS
    WASTELESS SOLUTIONS INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $3k · revenue +408%
  • MS
    MARBELLA SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION
    5× · 2017–2023 · $2k · revenue +103%

Funded once

  • NH
    Neighborhood House Association
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +23%
  • SM
    ST MATHEWS PARISH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • DF
    DURHAM FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Family Promise - Salt Lake

We help families experiencing homelessness find lasting independence and security.

Housing & Shelter
2
Mcminnville Area Habitat for Humanity

To build partnerships among volunteers, families, and the community in order to build simple, decent houses for families in need.

—
3
Wasatch Homeless Health Care

Help homeless Utahns improve their health and quality of life by providing high-quality health care and support services.

Health
4
San Diego Habitat Conservancy

Acquire, manage and protect land in perpetuity that supports sensitive habitats and species, and to educate and inspire people and communities as stewards and advocates of their natural environment.

Arts & Culture
5
Mountainlands Community Housing Associat

Mountainlands community housing association's (mcha) purpose is based on the belief that a safe affordable home is often a family's first step toward economic self-sufficiency. mcha addresses the dual problems of housing affordability and…

Unclassified
6
Holston Habitat for Humanity Inc

Seeking to put Gods love into action, Holston Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

—
7
Housing Collaborative

Housing Collaborative makes affordable housing easier to navigate by helping to secure rental housing for those experiencing or at risk of homelessness; and for those who have lost housing due to disaster or displacement. We make it easier…

Housing & Shelter
8
Utah Humanities Council

Utah Humanities collaborates with libraries, museums, historical societies, schools, colleges, and cultural and civic groups; provides capacity-building opportunities for volunteers and professionals in the cultural sector; presents…

Arts & Culture
9
Habitat for Humanity International Albany Area

Habitat for humanity works in partnership with god and people everywhere, from all walks of life, to develop communities with people in need by building and renovating houses, so that there are decent houses in decent communities in which…

Housing & Shelter
10
The Center for Economic Opportunity and Belonging

Our mission is to engage with communities and catalyze private, public, and philanthropic partnerships to remedy opportunity gaps in economic opportunity, education, health, and housing in Utah.

Community Improvement
11
Wedontwaste Inc

We Dont Waste increases food access and protects the planet by rescuing and repurposing food, while educating and advocating to increase food security and decrease food waste.

Food & Nutrition
12
Sustainable Harvest International

Working together to create a just and sustainable world through transformative farmer training that nourishes communities and the Earth.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Mundi Project; the most unlike its peers is Wasteless Solutions Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE WATERFORD SCHOOL: $16,343 · OtherTHE WATERFORD SCHOOLBOOK HARVEST: $9,012 · OtherBOOK HARVESTDURHAM ACADEMY DEVELOPMENT: $3,120 · OtherDURHAM ACADEMY DEVELOPMENTURBAN MINISTRIES: $2,837 · OtherURBAN MINISTRIESDURHAM PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $2,500 · OtherDURHAM PUBLIC SCHOOLSST MATHEWS PARISH SCHOOL: $2,000 · OtherDURHAM FOOD BANK: $1,900 · OtherTRIANGLE RESIDENTIAL OPTIONS FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSERS INC: $1,700 · Other+11 more: $5,532 · Other+11 moreBOOK HARVEST: $3,800 · EducationBOOK HARVE…MARBELLA SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $1,800 · EducationMARBELLA S…WASTELESS SOLUTIONS INC: $3,175 · Food & NutritionNeighborhood House Association: $2,000 · Human ServicesMaliheh Free Clinic: $1,500 · HealthSalt Lake Education Foundation: $560 · PhilanthropyTHE MUNDI PROJECT: $500 · Arts & CultureJUSTICEMATTERS INC: $50 · Crime & Legal
Other$44,944Education$5,600Food & Nutrition$3,175Human Services$2,000Health$1,500Philanthropy$560Arts & Culture$500Crime & Legal$50

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWASTELESS SOLUTIONS INC: $3,175 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetNeighborhood House Association: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARBELLA SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $1,800 over 5y, 18% of budgetTRIANGLE RESIDENTIAL OPTIONS FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSERS INC: $1,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMaliheh Free Clinic: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHenderson County & Thermal Belt Habitat for Humanity: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSalt Lake Education Foundation: $560 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MUNDI PROJECT: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJUSTICEMATTERS INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOOK HARVEST ↗
  • Who funds WASTELESS SOLUTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds Neighborhood House Association ↗
  • Who funds MARBELLA SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TRIANGLE RESIDENTIAL OPTIONS FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSERS INC ↗
  • Who funds Maliheh Free Clinic ↗
  • Who funds Henderson County & Thermal Belt Habitat for Humanity ↗
  • Who funds Salt Lake Education Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE MUNDI PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds JUSTICEMATTERS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family FoundationUT15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · David Kelby Johnson Memorial Foundation · George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John L & Ardis J Piers Private Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John L & Ardis J Piers Private Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on John L & Ardis J Piers Private’s filings →

    More from the funding graph