Skip to content

· Private foundation

John Kurtich Foundation for Study and Research

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$76k
Granted FY2023
10
Grants FY2023
4
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Arts & Culture$489kEducation$98kCivil Rights$15kYouth Development$3k
02FY2023 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k6 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $45k
$6,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SCHOOL OF THE ART INSTITUTE$15,000
CHILDRENS THEATRE OF MINNEAPOLIS$10,000
VANDERCOOK COLLEGE OF MUSIC$10,000
RIEKES CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS$10,000
OCCIDENTIAL COLLEGE$6,000
ALLIANCE FRANCAISE$5,000
SOLTI FOUNDATION$5,000
CRISTO REY JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
ART HOUSE$5,000
LUTHER COLLEGE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 68% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CHILDRENS THEATRE OF MINNEAPOLIS: $30k → 11%RIEKES CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS: $10k → 7%OCCIDENTIAL COLLEGE: $6k → 14%PALM COAST ARTS FOUNDATION: $13k → 9%LUTHER COLLEGE: $13k → 10%CLOPTON ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $6k → 15%LINCOLN COLLEGE: $9k → 14%SCHOOL OF THE ART INSTITUTE: $83k → 14%CHILDRENS THEATRE OF MINNEAPOLIS: $25k → 11%RIEKES CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS: $5k → 7%OCCIDENTIAL COLLEGE: $5k → 14%KIDS ROCK THE NATION: $3k → 9%LUTHER COLLEGE: $10k → 10%LINCOLN COLLEGE: $5k → 14%SCHOOL OF THE ART INSTITUTE: $73k → 14%CHILDRENS THEATRE OF MINNEAPOLIS: $15k → 11%OCCIDENTIAL COLLEGE: $5k → 14%LUTHER COLLEGE: $9k → 10%SCHOOL OF THE ART INSTITUTE: $63k → 14%CHILDRENS THEATRE OF MINNEAPOLIS: $10k → 11%OCCIDENTIAL COLLEGE: $5k → 14%VESTERHEIM MUSEUM: $9k → 10%SCHOOL OF THE ART INSTITUTE: $15k → 14%CHILDRENS THEATRE OF MINNEAPOLIS: $5k → 11%VESTERHEIM MUSEUM: $8k → 10%SCHOOL OF THE ART INSTITUTE: $15k → 14%ART HOUSE: $8k → 10%SCHOOL OF THE ART INSTITUTE: $15k → 14%ART HOUSE: $5k → 10%SCHOOL OF THE ART INSTITUTE: $15k → 14%ART HOUSE: $5k → 10%ALLIANCE FRANCAISE: $10k → 14%ART HOUSE: $5k → 10%ALLIANCE FRANCAISE: $5k → 14%LUTHER COLLEGE: $5k → 10%ALLIANCE FRANCAISE: $5k → 14%VANDERCOOK COLLEGE OF MUSIC: $10k → 14%ALLIANCE FRANCAISE: $5k → 14%VANDERCOOK COLLEGE OF MUSIC: $10k → 14%VANDERCOOK COLLEGE OF MUSIC: $5k → 14%SKOPELOS FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS: $5k → 14%CRISTO REY HIGH SCHOOL: $5k → 14%CRISTO REY JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL: $5k → 14%CRISTO REY JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL: $5k → 14%CRISTO REY HIGH SCHOOL: $5k → 14%SOLTI FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%SOLTI FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%SOLTI FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$578k · 13 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
4

Total granted

$578k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-29%
+104%

Still filing today

54%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
EducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SO
    SCHOOL OF THE ART INSTITUTE
    7× · 2017–2023 · $279k
  • CT
    CHILDRENS THEATRE OF MINNEAPOLIS
    5× · 2019–2023 · $85k
  • LC
    LUTHER COLLEGE
    4× · 2020–2023 · $37k · revenue -2%

Funded once

  • PC
    PALM COAST ARTS FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $13k · revenue -99%
  • CA
    CLOPTON ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue +104%
  • SF
    SKOPELOS FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
2
California Institute of Contemporary Art
—
3
Chicago Wind Symphony
Arts & Culture
4
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
5
Laguna College of Art & Design

Laguna college of art & design prepares individuals for careers as creative artists and designers in a culturally and ethnically diverse world through a curriculum that emphasizes acquiring skills based on observation, representation, and…

Education
6
Hillsdale College

Hillsdale college is a private liberal arts college with approximately 1,500 students. founded in 1844, the college remains, in the words of its articles of association, "grateful to god for the inestimable blessings resulting from the…

Education
7
Concordia University Chicago

Steadfast in jesus christ as revealed in the holy scriptures, concordia university chicago promotes academic rigor in its liberal arts and professional programs; grounds students in objective truth, integrity, and excellence; and practices…

Education
8
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
9
California College of the Arts

California college of the arts educates students to shape culture and society through the practice and critical study of art, architecture, design, and writing. benefitting from its san francisco bay area location, the college prepares…

Education
10
Bard College

Bard college seeks to provide a challenging academic program and a supportive environment that fosters a collaborative interchange of ideas in the classroom as well as ambition to achieve excellence.

Education
11
St Olaf College

St. olaf college challenges students to excel in the liberal arts, examine faith and values, and explore meaningful vocation in an inclusive, globally engaged community nourished by lutheran tradition.

Education
12
Cornell College

Cornell college offers an innovative and rigorous learning community where faculty and staff collaborate with students to develop the intellectual curiosity, creativity and moral courage necessary for a lifetime of learning and engaged…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Occidental College; the most unlike its peers is The Solti Foundation Us Co Fiona Queen. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
3/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SCHOOL OF THE ART INSTITUTE: $278,650 · OtherSCHOOL OF THE ART INSTITUTECHILDRENS THEATRE OF MINNEAPOLIS: $85,000 · OtherCHILDRENS THEATRE OF MINNEAPOLISVANDERCOOK COLLEGE OF MUSIC: $25,000 · OtherVANDERCOOK COLLEGE OF MUSICVESTERHEIM MUSEUM: $17,000 · Other+6 more: $55,000 · Other+6 moreLUTHER COLLEGE: $36,500 · EducationLUTHER COLLEGEOCCIDENTAL COLLEGE: $21,000 · EducationOCCIDENTAL COL…LINCOLN UNIVERSITY AKA LINCOLN COLLEGE: $14,000 · EducationLINCOLN UNIVER…CLOPTON ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC: $6,000 · EducationCLOPTON ALUMNI…THE ALLIANCE FRANCAISEFRENCH HOUSE OF CHICAGO: $27,500 · Arts & CultureTHE ALLIA…ARTHAUS INC: $23,000 · Arts & CultureARTHAUS I…THE SOLTI FOUNDATION US CO Fiona Queen: $15,000 · Philanthropy
Other$460,650Education$77,500Arts & Culture$50,500Philanthropy$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLUTHER COLLEGE: $36,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ALLIANCE FRANCAISEFRENCH HOUSE OF CHICAGO: $27,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetVANDERCOOK COLLEGE OF MUSIC: $25,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetARTHAUS INC: $23,000 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetOCCIDENTAL COLLEGE: $21,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SOLTI FOUNDATION US CO Fiona Queen: $15,000 over 3y, 16% of budgetLINCOLN UNIVERSITY AKA LINCOLN COLLEGE: $14,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCLOPTON ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC: $6,000 over 1y, 12% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LUTHER COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE ALLIANCE FRANCAISEFRENCH HOUSE OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds VANDERCOOK COLLEGE OF MUSIC ↗
  • Who funds ARTHAUS INC ↗
  • Who funds OCCIDENTAL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE SOLTI FOUNDATION US CO Fiona Queen ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN UNIVERSITY AKA LINCOLN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds PALM COAST ARTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CLOPTON ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA9.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John Kurtich Foundation for Study and Research funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John Kurtich Foundation for Study and Research. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to John Kurtich Foundation for Study and Research?

    Find your warmest path to John Kurtich Foundation for Study and Research through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on John Kurtich Foundation for Study and Research’s filings →

    More from the funding graph