Skip to content

· Private foundation

John J and Elizabeth M Kunkel & Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$59k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$101kFood & Nutrition$80kPhilanthropy$80kYouth Development$56kAnimals$51kHealth$40kEnvironment$34kPublic Benefit$16kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WEBSTER DUDLEY FOOD SHARE INC$10,000
UNITED WAY OF WEBSTER DUDLEY$10,000
TRI VALLEY ELDER SERVICES INC$10,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WEBSTER-DUDLEY$5,000
SOUTHERN WORCESTER COUNTY REHABILITATION CENTER INC$5,000
COMMUNITY CAT CONNECTION INC$5,000
WEBSTER LAKE ASSOCIATION INC$3,000
CURE ALZHEIMER'S FUND$2,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$2,000
FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE TOYS FOR TOTS$2,000
MSPCA-ANGELL$2,000
THE VETERANS COUNCIL$2,000
BLESSED BACKPACK BRIGADE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $80k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WEBSTER DUDLEY FOOD SHARE INC: $10k → 11%WEBSTER DUDLEY FOOD SHARE INC: $10k → 11%WEBSTER DUDLEY FOOD SHARE INC: $10k → 11%WEBSTER DUDLEY FOOD SHARE INC: $10k → 11%WEBSTER DUDLEY FOOD SHARE INC: $10k → 11%WEBSTER DUDLEY FOOD SHARE INC: $10k → 11%WEBSTER DUDLEY FOOD SHARE INC: $10k → 11%WEBSTER DUDLEY FOOD SHARE INC: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$454k · 13 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
3

Total granted

$454k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+19%

Still filing today

54%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsHealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WD
    WEBSTER DUDLEY FOOD SHARE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +91%
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WEBSTER-DUDLEY INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $40k · revenue +94%
  • CC
    COMMUNITY CAT CONNECTION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $40k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • AV
    AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +19%
  • AS
    ALL SAINTS ACADEMY SPORTS PROGRAM
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • IS
    IT STARTS AT HOME INC
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Worcester Animal Rescue League Inc

Provide and promote humane animal welfare to pets in need.

Animals
2
Danbury Animal Welfare Society

Danbury animal welfare society , inc.(daws) is a non-profit organization dedicated to improving the lives of animals in our community and beyond. we promote responsible pet guardianship and the humane treatment of animals, and work toward…

Animals
3
Animal Welfare League of Montgomery County

The animal welfare league of montgomery county (awlmc) mission is to improve animal welfare in montgomery county, maryland by operating a no-kill shelter for adoptable cats and promoting responsible pet ownership.

Animals
4
Michigan Animal Rescue League

The mission of the michigan animal rescue league is to provide the highest quality of life to dogs and cats through rescue, medical care, socialization and behavioral support, short- and long-term sanctuary, adoption, and community…

Animals
5
Connecticut Humane Society

The connecticut humane society is the leading resource in the state for companion animal welfare, enriching the lives of families and communities through adoption services, medical care, education, and prevention of cruelty.

Animals
6
Michigan Anti-Cruelty Society

To maintain and operate a hospital, ambulance and veterinary services for the care of animals. the maintenance and operation of kennels and suitable chambers for the humane destruction of wounded animals.

Animals
7
American Assoc of Swine Veterinarians

To advance the practice of swine veterinary medicine.

—
8
All About Animals Rescue

All about animals rescue's mission is no more homeless pets.

Animals
9
Animal Rescue League of Berks County Inc

We protect animals, provide a safe haven, and promote innovative programs and services to help both people and animals in need throughout berks county.

Animals
10
Worcester County Humane Society Inc

To promote humane treatment of animals, operate the animal shelter, and assist with the adoption of animals.

Animals
11
Save a Dog Inc

To help adoptive dogs find a permanent home.

Animals
12
Animal Protective League of Springfield and Sangamon County

Devoted to the rescue and care of sick, injured or homeless animals and education of the public regarding spaying and neutering to avoid and reduce overpopulation.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Massachusetts Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals; the most unlike its peers is American Veterinary Medical Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED WAY OF WEBSTER DUDLEY: $80,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF WEBSTER DUDLEYTRI VALLEY ELDER SERVICES INC: $80,000 · OtherTRI VALLEY ELDER SERVICES INCTHE VETERANS COUNCIL: $16,000 · OtherTHE VETERANS COUNCILFRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE TOYS FOR TOTS: $16,000 · OtherFRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE TOYS FOR TOTSTHE SALVATION ARMY: $12,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYBLESSED BACKPACK BRIGADE INC: $8,000 · Other+2 more: $2,500 · OtherWEBSTER DUDLEY FOOD SHARE INC: $80,000 · Human ServicesWEBSTER DUDLEY FOOD…COMMUNITY CAT CONNECTION INC: $40,000 · AnimalsCOMMUNITY CA…MASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $8,000 · AnimalsMASSACHUSETT…AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $3,000 · AnimalsAMERICAN VET…BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WEBSTER-DUDLEY INC: $40,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND …LIFE-SKILLS INC: $33,800 · HealthLIFE-SKIL…ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $6,000 · HealthALZHEIMER…WEBSTER LAKE ASSOCIATION INC: $34,000 · Environment
Other$214,500Human Services$80,000Animals$51,000Youth Development$40,000Health$39,800Environment$34,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWEBSTER DUDLEY FOOD SHARE INC: $80,000 over 8y, 12% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WEBSTER-DUDLEY INC: $40,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY CAT CONNECTION INC: $40,000 over 8y, 3.9% of budgetWEBSTER LAKE ASSOCIATION INC: $34,000 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetLIFE-SKILLS INC: $33,800 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WEBSTER DUDLEY FOOD SHARE INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WEBSTER-DUDLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY CAT CONNECTION INC ↗
  • Who funds WEBSTER LAKE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFE-SKILLS INC ↗
  • Who funds MASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fels Family FoundationMA15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fels Family Foundation · The Janet Malser Humanities Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John J and Elizabeth M Kunkel & Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John J and Elizabeth M Kunkel & Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 91%
  • Life-Skills Inc: 91% of income from government
  • Webster Lake Association Inc: 20% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to John J and Elizabeth M Kunkel & Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to John J and Elizabeth M Kunkel & Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on John J and Elizabeth M Kunkel & Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph