Skip to content

· Private foundation

John H Noll Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$213k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$24k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.8M
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $207k
$20,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$4.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIV OF ST FRANCIS FBO VICTORIA$23,874
FRANCISCAN UNIV OF STEUBENVILLE FBO$22,937
INDIANA UNIV FBO REBECCA INNOCENT$22,473
ST MARYS COLLEGE FBO RACHEL HENSLEY$20,951
VALPARAISO UNIV FBO ROMAN VAN METER$20,951
BUTLER UNIV FBO SIMONE MCCOWAN$20,000
ROSE-HULMAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FBO$20,000
UNIV OF ST FRANCIS FBO STELLA HUDSON$15,752
CENTRAL LAKES COLLEGE FBO JAVIUS$15,461
UNIV OF CINCINNATI FBO JAYSE KUNTZ$13,000
INDIANA UNIV FBO NINA WITTE$12,000
TRINE UNIV FBO EVAN KOMRSKA$5,746
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–20) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 93% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%KELLIE HOCKEMEYER: $46k → 11%SAINT MARY'S COLLEGE: $9k → 9%GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY: $7k → 8%CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY: $8k → 14%TRINE UNIVERSITY: $18k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF ST FRANCIS: $34k → 12%MANCHESTER UNIVERSITY: $5k → 12%ST MARY'S COLLEGE: $13k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF INDIANAPOLIS: $6k → 16%INDIANA UNIVERSITY: $16k → 18%INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 19%BALL STATE UNIVERSITY: $8k → 19%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $56k → 19%INDIANA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $9k → 19%BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY: $7k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN OHIO: $8k → 13%DEPAUL UNIVERSITY: $7k → 14%MAXWELL IMLER: $12k → 11%CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY: $8k → 14%TRINE UNIVERSITY: $13k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF SAINT FRANCIS: $32k → 12%ST MARY'S COLLEGE: $13k → 13%INDIANA UNIVERSITY - BLOOMINGTON: $8k → 18%INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 19%BALL STATE UNIVERSITY: $8k → 19%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $31k → 19%INDIANA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $9k → 19%BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY: $7k → 12%JACOB YEHLE: $9k → 11%CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY: $8k → 14%TRINE UNIVERSITY: $9k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF ST FRANCIS: $18k → 12%INDIANA UNIVERSITY: $6k → 18%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $26k → 19%INDIANA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $9k → 19%BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY: $7k → 12%JANE KORSON: $9k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF SAINT FRANCIS: $11k → 12%ALYSSA GRIMM: $9k → 11%INDIANA UNIVERSITY-PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $31k → 12%MARISSA WIGENT: $9k → 11%INDIANA UNIVERSITY-PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $30k → 12%AZORA SISON-GORMAN: $7k → 11%INDIANA UNIVERSITY-PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $9k → 12%JUSTIN FREEMAN: $6k → 11%INDIANA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $11k → 12%INDIANA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $7k → 12%MARGARET A TIPPMANN: $35k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
IN
OH
PA
CA
KY
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 35 repeat orgs$596k to everyone else

35 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 35 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
33

Total granted

$1.2M
$383k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+25%

Still filing today

20%
12%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $213k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF SAINT FRANCIS OF FORT WAYNE INDIANA INC
    2× · 2017–2019 · $52k · revenue +32%
  • TU
    Trine University
    3× · 2017–2019 · $39k · revenue +135%
  • IW
    INDIANA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2017–2019 · $27k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $46k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $46k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $35k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
2
Otterbein University

Otterbein University is an inclusive community dedicated to educating the whole person in the context of humane values. Our mission is to prepare graduates to think deeply and broadly, to engage locally and globally, and to advance their…

Education
3
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
4
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
5
Loyola University

Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…

Education
6
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
7
John Carroll University

As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

Education
8
Walsh University Inc

Walsh university is an independent, coeducational catholic, liberal arts and sciences institution dedicated to educating its students to become leaders in service to others through a values-based education with an international perspective…

Education
9
University of Notre Dame du Lac

See Schedule O. See explanation for Form 990, Part I, Line 1 - Organization's Mission above.

Education
10
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
11
Nebraska Wesleyan University

Nebraska wesleyan university is an academic community dedicated to intellectual and personal growth within the context of a liberal arts education and in an environment of christian concern.

Education
12
Saint Martin's University

Saint martin's students learn to make a positive difference in their lives and in the lives of others through the interaction of faith, reason, and service. the university honors both the sacredness of the individual and the significance…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Indiana Institute of Technology Inc; the most unlike its peers is Depaul University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 80 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $113,250 · OtherTRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITYIndividual grant recipient: $105,300 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $92,800 · OtherIndividual grant recipientINDIANA UNIVERSITY-PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $70,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $62,853 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $62,853 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $54,508 · Other+61 more: $1,007,433 · Other+61 moreUNIVERSITY OF SAINT FRANCIS OF FORT WAYNE INDIANA INC: $51,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF…Trine University: $38,950 · EducationTrine Univers…INDIANA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $26,748 · EducationINDIANA WESLE…FRANCISCAN UNIVERSITY OF STEUBENVILLE: $22,937 · EducationFRANCISCAN UN…INDIANA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $17,750 · EducationINDIANA INSTI…UNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN OHIO: $15,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF…SAINT MARY'S COLLEGE OF CALIFORNIA: $8,500 · Education+5 more: $29,700 · Education+5 more
Other$1,568,997Education$211,585

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF SAINT FRANCIS OF FORT WAYNE INDIANA INC: $51,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTrine University: $38,950 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetINDIANA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $26,748 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRANCISCAN UNIVERSITY OF STEUBENVILLE: $22,937 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRose-Hulman Institute of Technology: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINDIANA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $17,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN OHIO: $15,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT MARY'S COLLEGE OF CALIFORNIA: $8,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDEPAUL UNIVERSITY: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetButler University: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBETHEL UNIVERSITY INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Indianapolis: $5,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMANCHESTER UNIVERSITY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SAINT FRANCIS OF FORT WAYNE INDIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds Trine University ↗
  • Who funds INDIANA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds FRANCISCAN UNIVERSITY OF STEUBENVILLE ↗
  • Who funds Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds INDIANA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jp Crain Family Scholarship Pfdn Paulding County Area FoundationOH15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jp Crain Family Scholarship Pfdn Paulding County Area Foundation · Surack Family Foundation Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · Verizon Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John H Noll Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John H Noll Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 80 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on John H Noll’s filings →

    More from the funding graph