Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

John F and Mary a Geisse Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$581k
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
14
States reached
$63k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

International$2.5MPhilanthropy$1.6MEnvironment$497kReligion$133kScience & Tech$95kEducation$87kHuman Services$49kArts & Culture$36kOther$0
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $155k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $398k
$10,000
Median grant
14
States reached
$4.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BUILDING HOPE IN THE CITY$62,500
ASSOCIATION FOR A MORE JUST SOCIETY$60,000
IDE$60,000
WATER FOR GOOD$60,000
COOPERATIVE FOR EDUCATION$55,000
STRATEGIES FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT$50,000
HEALING WATERS$50,000
EL PORVENIR$40,000
CONGO LEADERSHIP INITIATIVE$35,000
SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND$30,000
FIDELITY CHARITABLE GIFT FUND$20,000
STIFEL CHARITABLE FUND$10,000
MERCY SHIPS$10,000
VANGUARD CHARITABLE$10,000
THE ANDY FUND$7,880
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 73% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PROJECT WORTHMORE: $5k → 8%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $100 → 7%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $7k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $7k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
NV
IN
OH
NJ
RI
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
AR
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.9M · 36 repeat orgs$266k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +32% for the ones you funded once.

36 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
41

Total granted

$4.9M
$186k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+32%

Still filing today

56%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $79k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEducationReligionHealthHuman ServicesCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    ASSOCIATION FOR A MORE JUST SOCIETY -US
    7× · 2019–2025 · $859k · revenue +227%
  • SF
    STRATEGIES FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
    7× · 2019–2025 · $365k · revenue +82%
  • CF
    COOPERATIVE FOR EDUCATION
    6× · 2019–2025 · $255k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • LI
    LIFEWATER INC
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -92%
  • CA
    COVA AGUA
    one grant, 2024 · $35k · revenue 0%
  • BT
    BUILDING TOMORROW INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue +60%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Devworks International

Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.

Human Services
2
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
3
International Development Enterprises

See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.

International
4
International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion
5
Water to Thrive

Water to Thrive transforms lives in rural Africa by working with partners and beneficiaries to bring the blessing of clean, safe water, connecting communities in need with supporters who have the heart and spirit to make a difference

International
6
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

7
Yours Humanly

Yours Humanly (YH) transforms the lives of children in need around the world by providing access to quality education and equitable resources. Through its two flagship initiatives, Coloring Futures and Bridging Gaps, YH has completed 34…

Education
8
Counterpart International Inc

For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…

International
9
Inclusive Development International

Inclusive Development International supports communities around the world to defend their rights and resources in the face of harmful corporate activities and internationally financed development projects, and we advocate for a more just…

International
10
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
11
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
12
Accion International

Our mission is to create a fair and inclusive economy where underserved people have quality financial choices and opportunities to improve their economic well-being. we find and help build innovative companies with the potential to reach…

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma and the most unlike its peers is Encouragement Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Youth Sports ProgramsChristian Missionary Organi…Cancer Support ServicesChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Environmental Conservation …Food Banks and PantriesJewish Community Organizati…Youth Development ServicesPolicy Research and Advocacy
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%5%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%16%10–20yr16%44%20–35yr13%21%35–55yr16%14%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%71%20–35yr13%9%35–55yr16%4%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/62
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,503

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

58 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 58 of the 91 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
57/58
Grantees still filing
43/58
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

STIFEL CHARITABLE FUND — $1,114,194 · OtherSTIFEL CHARITABLE FUNDIDE — $385,000 · OtherIDEHEALING WATERS — $335,000 · OtherHEALING WATERSLIFEWATER INTERNATIONAL — $200,000 · OtherLIFEWATER INTERNATIONALIndividual grant recipient — $100,000 · OtherDESERT RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $95,000 · Other+48 more — $362,124 · Other+48 moreASSOCIATION FOR A MORE JUST SOCIETY -US — $858,960 · InternationalASSOCIATION FOR A MORE JUST SOCIETY -USSTRATEGIES FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT — $365,000 · InternationalSTRATEGIES FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENTCONGO LEADERSHIP INITIATIVE INC — $210,000 · InternationalCONGO LEADERSHIP INITIATIVE INCEducate — $200,000 · InternationalEducateEL PORVENIR — $151,000 · InternationalEL PORVENIRWATER FOR PEOPLE — $100,000 · International+13 more — $188,200 · International+13 moreDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $251,000 · PhilanthropyVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM — $70,770 · Philanthropy+1 more — $2,000 · PhilanthropyCOOPERATIVE FOR EDUCATION — $255,000 · EducationCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $43,000 · Education+6 more — $10,274 · EducationBUILDING HOPE IN THE CITY — $128,895 · Religion+3 more — $1,700 · ReligionFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $100,000 · Community ImprovementLIFEWATER INC — $50,000 · EnvironmentHUNTINGTON BEACH TREE SOCIETY INC — $11,000 · Environment
Other$2,591,318International$2,073,160Philanthropy$323,770Education$308,274Religion$130,595Community Improvement$100,000Environment$61,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetASSOCIATION FOR A MORE JUST SOCIETY -US — $858,960 over 7y, 15% of budgetSTRATEGIES FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT — $365,000 over 7y, 24% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR EDUCATION — $255,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $251,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCONGO LEADERSHIP INITIATIVE INC — $210,000 over 7y, 12% of budgetEducate — $200,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetEL PORVENIR — $151,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetBUILDING HOPE IN THE CITY — $128,895 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $100,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWATER FOR PEOPLE — $100,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM — $70,770 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLIFEWATER INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $43,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOVA AGUA — $35,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetVILLAGE ENTERPRISE FUND — $31,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetBUILDING TOMORROW INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetURBAN COMMUNITY SCHOOL — $29,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetMercy Ships International — $25,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHORSE NATION INC DBA FREE REIN FOUNDATION — $20,500 over 5y, 3.6% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES — $14,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC — $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHUNTINGTON BEACH TREE SOCIETY INC — $11,000 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetTHE HAVEN OF GRACE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SONOMA-MARIN — $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget10000 DEGREES — $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT WORTHMORE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTrue Freedom Inc — $4,600 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFIGHTING BACK PARTNERSHIP INC — $2,400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBridge the Gap College Prep — $2,400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetECHO Inc — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH OPPORTUNITIES UNLIMITED — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEAGLE CREEK PARK FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHIRAM COLLEGE — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Dartmouth College — $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRAYO DE SOL INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLIFEHOUSE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAdvocates International Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAmigos de Honduras — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBREAST CANCER PREVENTION PARTNERS — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOBILITY WORLDWIDE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Odyssey School — $874 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOUTRUN THE SUN INC — $850 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMARK DAY SCHOOL — $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN UNION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKQED INC — $320 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetURBAN SQUASH CLEVELAND — $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ASSOCIATION FOR A MORE JUST SOCIETY -US
  • Who funds STRATEGIES FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR EDUCATION
  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC
  • Who funds CONGO LEADERSHIP INITIATIVE INC
  • Who funds Educate
  • Who funds EL PORVENIR
  • Who funds BUILDING HOPE IN THE CITY
  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND
  • Who funds WATER FOR PEOPLE
  • Who funds VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM
  • Who funds WATER FOR GOOD
  • Who funds LIFEWATER INC
  • Who funds CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds COVA AGUA
  • Who funds VILLAGE ENTERPRISE FUND
  • Who funds BUILDING TOMORROW INC
  • Who funds URBAN COMMUNITY SCHOOL
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International
  • Who funds HORSE NATION INC DBA FREE REIN FOUNDATION
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES
  • Who funds GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds HUNTINGTON BEACH TREE SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds THE HAVEN OF GRACE
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SONOMA-MARIN

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The West Foundation IncIN20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The West Foundation Inc · Marin Community Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · In His Steps Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Stone Family Foundation · Give Lively Foundation Inc · McNabb Foundation · The Cleveland Foundation · Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · American Endowment Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization John F and Mary a Geisse Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to John F and Mary a Geisse Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to John F and Mary a Geisse Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 91 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph