Skip to content

· Private foundation

John F & Doris E Ernsthausen Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$354k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$744kPhilanthropy$530kCommunity Improvement$100kReligion$60kAnimals$47kArts & Culture$43kRecreation & Sports$30kMembership Benefit$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $84k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $265k
$19,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$5.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORWALK AREA UNITED FUND$125,000
NORWALK CATHOLIC SCHOOLS$70,000
NORWALK CITY SCHOOLS$70,000
NORWALK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$20,000
HURON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY$19,000
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$15,000
NORWALK PUBLIC LIBRARY$10,000
ARTIST OPEN STUDIO$10,000
FIRELANDS HISTORICAL SOCIETY$10,000
HURON COUNTY IMAGINATION LIBRARY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CLOTHING BANK OF NORWALK OHIO: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 10 repeat orgs$56k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +56% since the first grant, against -11% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
5

Total granted

$1.5M
$46k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
-11%

Still filing today

50%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CulturePhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementAnimalsEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NA
    NORWALK AREA UNITED FUND
    5× · 2021–2025 · $530k · revenue +46% · 54% of their budget
  • HC
    HURON COUNTY GROWTH PARTNERHIP CHARITIES
    5× · 2021–2025 · $100k · revenue +69%
  • HC
    HURON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $47k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • NP
    NORWALK PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • NA
    NORWALK AREA FRIENDS FOR YOUTH SPORTS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -79%
  • TL
    TEEN LEADERSHIP CORPS
    one grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue -11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Huron County Growth Partnership

Promote huron county, ohio business

—
2
Huron County Development Council

Strengthen industrial operations in huron county, ohio

Community Improvement
3
Norwalk Historical Society Inc

To maintain the research, preservation and promotion of norwalk history.

Arts & Culture
4
Norwalk Harbor Keeper
—
5
Norton Bicentennial Incorporated

To facilitate acquistition of real property to be dedicated to use as a public park in the city of bucyrus, ohio.

Recreation & Sports
6
Granville Ohio Historical Society

The Granville Historical Society acquires, preserves, and shares Granvilles past with residents and visitors to inspire curiosity about, instill knowledge of, and foster a commitment to our history.

—
7
Norwalk Land Trust Inc

Norwalk land trust seeks to balance nature and development by acquiring land and preserving it in its natural state for the benefit of norwalk residents and future generations.

—
8
Greater Norwalk Chamber of Commerce Inc

Promotion and support of commercial & civic awareness and activities in the greater norwalk area.

Community Improvement
9
Committee for Our Cleveland Metroparks

Local ballot issue political action committee located in the state of Ohio

—
10
Huron County Community Foundation

The mission of the huron county community foundation is to provide for the enrichment of the quality life in huron county by developing a permanent endowment to assess and respond to changing community needs and by serving as a charitable…

Philanthropy
11
Norwalk High School Parents Club
Education
12
North Central Ohio Land Conservancy Inc

Protecting natural areas in Ohio through conservation easements and public education regarding the importance of natural areas.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Clothing Bank of Norwalk Ohio; the most unlike its peers is Artists Open Studio Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORWALK CITY SCHOOLS: $330,000 · OtherNORWALK CITY SCHOOLSNORWALK CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $305,000 · OtherNORWALK CATHOLIC SCHOOLNORWALK PUBLIC LIBRARY: $84,000 · OtherNORWALK PUBLIC LIBRARYFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $60,000 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH+4 more: $55,000 · Other+4 moreNORWALK AREA UNITED FUND: $530,000 · PhilanthropyNORWALK AREA UNITED FUNDHURON COUNTY GROWTH PARTNERHIP CHARITIES: $100,000 · Community ImprovementHURON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $47,340 · AnimalsFIRELANDS HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $32,646 · Arts & CultureARTISTS OPEN STUDIO INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureNORWALK AREA FRIENDS FOR YOUTH SPORTS INC: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsTEEN LEADERSHIP CORPS: $6,000 · EducationTHE CLOTHING BANK OF NORWALK OHIO: $5,000 · Human Services
Other$834,000Philanthropy$530,000Community Improvement$100,000Animals$47,340Arts & Culture$42,646Recreation & Sports$10,000Education$6,000Human Services$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORWALK AREA UNITED FUND: $530,000 over 5y, 54% of budgetHURON COUNTY GROWTH PARTNERHIP CHARITIES: $100,000 over 5y, 10% of budgetHURON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $47,340 over 5y, 4.7% of budgetFIRELANDS HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $32,646 over 5y, 8.8% of budgetNORWALK AREA FRIENDS FOR YOUTH SPORTS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetTHE NORWALK CEMETERY ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetTEEN LEADERSHIP CORPS: $6,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetTHE CLOTHING BANK OF NORWALK OHIO: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORWALK AREA UNITED FUND ↗
  • Who funds HURON COUNTY GROWTH PARTNERHIP CHARITIES ↗
  • Who funds HURON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds FIRELANDS HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds NORWALK AREA FRIENDS FOR YOUTH SPORTS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NORWALK CEMETERY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds ARTISTS OPEN STUDIO INC ↗
  • Who funds TEEN LEADERSHIP CORPS ↗
  • Who funds THE CLOTHING BANK OF NORWALK OHIO ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Twenty First Century FoundationOH22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Twenty First Century Foundation · Geotrac Charitable Foundation · The Albert G & Olive H Schlink Foundation · Price-Downey-Buckland Foundation · The Gerard and Patricia Hipp Family Foundation · Fisher-Titus Medical Center · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John F & Doris E Ernsthausen Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John F & Doris E Ernsthausen Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on John F & Doris E Ernsthausen’s filings →

    More from the funding graph