Skip to content

· Private foundation

John E Scully Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$112k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$109kPhilanthropy$103kHealth$90kYouth Development$61kFood & Nutrition$53kEducation$52kHuman Services$25kArts & Culture$19kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $45k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $67k
$5,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LEADERSHIP EDUCATION & ATHLETICS IN PARTNERSHIP (LEAP)$22,000
PRINCETON MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$20,000
SARAH FOUNDATION$15,000
LAKES REGION VINEYARD CHURCH$10,000
HEART AND ARMOR WITH JOHN MAYER$6,000
CURE ALZHEIMER'S FUND$5,000
JOE'S AGAPE HOUSE$5,000
SHEPHERDS TABLE$5,000
CAMPAIGN FOR TOBACCO-FREE KIDS$5,000
CPTV$5,000
CHILDREN'S COMMUNITY SCHOOL$3,000
CONNECTICUT FOOD SHARE$2,000
SEVEN ANGELS THEATRE$2,000
CLOSER TO FREE FUND$2,000
SMILE TRAIN$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 72% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CURE ALZHEIMER'S FUND: $10k → 7%BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER: $1k → 16%HEART AND ARMOR WITH JOHN MAYER: $6k → 14%SMILE TRAIN: $1k → 17%CAMPAIGN FOR TOBACCO-FREE KIDS: $5k → 14%CPTV: $5k → 11%CHILDREN'S COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $5k → 12%JOE'S PROVIDENCE RESCUE MISSION: $25k → 14%CHRISTIAN MISSIONS IN MANY LANDS: $20k → 6%PRINCETON MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $20k → 8%LAKES REGION VINEYARD CHURCH: $10k → 9%CURE ALZHEIMER'S FUND: $10k → 7%HEART AND ARMOR WITH JOHN MAYER: $1k → 14%SMILE TRAIN: $1k → 17%CAMPAIGN FOR TOBACCO-FREE KIDS: $5k → 14%OAK HILL CHAPTER 126: $20k → 11%CHILDREN'S COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $3k → 12%CHRISTIAN MISSIONS IN MANY LANDS: $5k → 6%PRINCETON MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $12k → 8%CURE ALZHEIMER'S FUND: $10k → 7%SMILE TRAIN: $1k → 17%OAK HILL CHAPTER 126: $4k → 11%SEVEN ANGELS THEATRE: $2k → 12%CHRISTIAN MISSIONS IN MANY LANDS: $2k → 6%CURE ALZHEIMER'S FUND: $5k → 7%SMILE TRAIN: $1k → 17%JOE'S AGAPE HOUSE: $5k → 11%SEVEN ANGELS THEATRE: $1k → 12%CURE ALZHEIMER'S FUND: $5k → 7%SMILE TRAIN: $1k → 17%SEVEN ANGELS THEATRE: $1k → 12%CHILDREN'S COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $4k → 12%SARAH FOUNDATION: $23k → 12%SARAH FOUNDATION: $20k → 12%SARAH FOUNDATION: $15k → 12%SARAH FOUNDATION: $15k → 12%SARAH FOUNDATION: $15k → 12%SARAH FOUNDATION: $15k → 12%LEADERSHIP EDUCATION & ATHLETICS IN PARTNERSHIP (LEAP): $22k → 12%LEADERSHIP EDUCATION & ATHLETICS IN PARTNERSHIP (LEAP): $22k → 12%LEADERSHIP EDUCATION & ATHLETICS IN PARTNERSHIP (LEAP): $10k → 12%LEADERSHIP EDUCATION & ATHLETICS IN PARTNERSHIP (LEAP): $6k → 12%LEADERSHIP EDUCATION & ATHLETICS IN PARTNERSHIP (LEAP): $2k → 12%CONNECTICUT FOOD SHARE: $2k → 12%CONNECTICUT FOOD SHARE: $2k → 12%CONNECTICUT FOOD SHARE: $2k → 12%CONNECTICUT FOOD SHARE: $2k → 12%SAINT VINCENT DEPAUL MISSION: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
NY
MA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
SC
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$443k · 20 repeat orgs$73k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +54% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
4

Total granted

$443k
$53k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+28%

Still filing today

50%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SARAH FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $103k · revenue +50%
  • LE
    LEADERSHIP EDUCATION AND ATHLETICS IN PARTNERSHIP INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $61k · revenue +101%
  • ST
    SHEPHERDS TABLE A SC ELEEMOS CORP
    5× · 2021–2025 · $45k · revenue +54%

Funded once

  • CC
    CHILDREN'S COMMUNITY SCHOOL WATERBURY CT
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • JP
    JOE'S PROVIDENCE RESCUE MISSION
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • SV
    SAINT VINCENT DEPAUL MISSION
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
2
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
3
Community Health Center Inc

Community health center (chc) is building a world class primary care organization, improving health outcomes and building healthier communities through clinical excellence, research and innovation, and training the next generation. chc is…

Health
4
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
5
The Food Trust

The food trust (tft), a nonprofit founded in philadelphia in 1992, strives to make healthy food available to all.continued on schedule otft is a regional and national leader in developing new strategies to prevent childhood obesity and…

Food & Nutrition
6
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
7
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
8
Yale New Haven Health Services Corporation

To support its member healthcare organizations further innovation and excellence in patient care, teaching, and research.

Health
9
American Institute for Cancer Research

Aicr champions the latest and most authoritative scientific research from around the world on cancer prevention and survival through diet, weight and physical activity, so that we can help people make informed lifestyle choices to reduce…

Health
10
East Tennessee Children's Hospital Association Inc

East tennessee children's hospital is a free-standing, independent, not-for-profit pediatric health care system which serves the east tennessee region. children's hospital is certified by the state of tennessee as a comprehensive regional…

Health
11
Altarum Institute

Altarum is focused on improving the health of individuals with fewer financial resources and populations disenfranchised by the health care system. we drive impactful changes in four domains: 1) transform health service delivery - we work…

Science & Tech
12
Care Transformation Collaborative of Ri

The mission of ctc-ri is to support the continuing transformation of primary care in rhode island as the foundation of an ever-improving integrated, accessible, affordable, and equitable health care system. ctc-ri brings together critical…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids; the most unlike its peers is Seven Angels Theatre Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PRINCETON MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $32,000 · OtherPRINCETON MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIONCLOSER TO FREE FUND: $32,000 · OtherCLOSER TO FREE FUNDCHRISTIAN MISSIONS IN MANY LANDS: $27,000 · OtherCHRISTIAN MISSIONS IN MANY LANDSCHILDREN'S COMMUNITY SCHOOL INC: $26,500 · OtherCHILDREN'S COMMUNITY SCHOOL INCCHILDREN'S COMMUNITY SCHOOL WATERBURY CT: $25,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S COMMUNITY SCHOOL WATERBURY CTJOE'S PROVIDENCE RESCUE MISSION: $25,000 · OtherJOE'S PROVIDENCE RESCUE MISSIONOAK HILL CHAPTER 126: $24,000 · OtherOAK HILL CHAPTER 126LAKES REGION VINEYARD CHURCH: $10,000 · Other+11 more: $46,950 · Other+11 moreSARAH FOUNDATION INC: $102,500 · PhilanthropySARAH FOUNDATION INCLEADERSHIP EDUCATION AND ATHLETICS IN PARTNERSHIP INC: $61,000 · EducationLEADERSHIP ED…ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $41,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S…CAMPAIGN FOR TOBACCO-FREE KIDS: $10,000 · HealthCAMPAIGN FO…+1 more: $1,000 · HealthSHEPHERDS TABLE A SC ELEEMOS CORP: $45,000 · Human ServicesSHEPHERDS…Seven Angels Theatre Inc: $4,000 · Arts & CultureMATTATUCK HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $3,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$248,450Philanthropy$102,500Education$61,000Health$52,000Human Services$45,000Arts & Culture$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSARAH FOUNDATION INC: $102,500 over 6y, 3.2% of budgetLEADERSHIP EDUCATION AND ATHLETICS IN PARTNERSHIP INC: $61,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetSHEPHERDS TABLE A SC ELEEMOS CORP: $45,000 over 5y, 5.3% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $41,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S COMMUNITY SCHOOL INC: $26,500 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetCAMPAIGN FOR TOBACCO-FREE KIDS: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSeven Angels Theatre Inc: $4,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetMATTATUCK HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SARAH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LEADERSHIP EDUCATION AND ATHLETICS IN PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds SHEPHERDS TABLE A SC ELEEMOS CORP ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S COMMUNITY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMPAIGN FOR TOBACCO-FREE KIDS ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds Seven Angels Theatre Inc ↗
  • Who funds MATTATUCK HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ion Bank Foundation IncCT13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ion Bank Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John E Scully Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John E Scully Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Leadership Education and Athletics in Partnership Inc: 17% of income from government
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Connecticut Foodshare Inc: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on John E Scully’s filings →

More from the funding graph