Skip to content

· Private foundation

John E Morgan Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$5.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
51
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$1.4M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$10MHealth$3.2MCommunity Improvement$2.2MFood & Nutrition$2.1MRecreation & Sports$1.8MPhilanthropy$660kHousing & Shelter$600kHuman Services$109kOther$0
02FY2024 · 51 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k37 grants · $219k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $48k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $637k
  • $250k+6 grants · $4.1M
$6,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$59M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HELPING HARVEST$1,350,000
Individual grant recipient$720,000
THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY PHILANTHROPIC FUND$600,000
BLOOMSBURG UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$500,000
KUTZTOWN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$500,000
GOOD SHEPARD$400,000
TAMAQUA AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT$228,000
SCHUYLKILL COUNTY UNITED WAY$120,000
LEHIGH CARBON COMMUNITY COLLEGEFALL$116,901
LEHIGH CARBON COMMUNITY COLLEGE FAL$61,817
LEHIGH CARBON COMMUNITY COLLEGE FAL$60,672
TAMAQUA AREA COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP$50,000
TAMAQUA AREA PUBLIC LIBRARY$35,000
LEHIGH CARBON COMMUNITY COLLEGE SUM$13,497
Individual grant recipient$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $59k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%SCHUYLKILL WOMEN IN CRISIS: $50k → 12%TAMAQUA AREA ADULT DAY CARE CENTER: $9k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$20M · 69 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

69 repeat relationships: 39 still active in FY2024, 30 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

69
18

Total granted

$20M
$362k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+12%

Still filing today

7%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $671k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    TAMAQUA AREA COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2.2M · revenue ×12 · 45% of their budget
  • HH
    HELPING HARVEST FRESH FOOD BANK
    3× · 2021–2024 · $2.1M · revenue +65%
  • LC
    LEHIGH CARBON COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2023 · $492k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $90k
  • AP
    AMERICAN PRIMITIVE METHODIST CHRURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $75k
  • SH
    SCHUYLKILL HOPE CENTERSWIC
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
2
Harcum College

Harcum college provides its students with an opportunity for outstanding academic, career, and life preparation. we teach, mentor, and prepare students for success in their chosen professions in an experiential environment. harcum's core…

Education
3
Susquehanna University

Susquehanna university educates students for productive, creative and reflective lives of achievement, leadership, and service in a diverse, dynamic and interdependent world.

Education
4
The Baruch College Fund

The baruch college fund is an organization engaged in generating, encouraging and promoting the educational welfare of the students of the bernard m. baruch college of the city university of new york.

Education
5
Illinois College

Illinois college is a co-educational institution of higher education learning providing a four-year educational program leading to the baccalaureate degree. illinois college is a community committed to the highest standards of scholarship…

Education
6
Bucks County Community College Foundation Inc

Assist bucks county community college by providing expanded resources for the college's growth and development. foundation funds support instructional resources, campus facilities, scholarships and awards, cultural activities, and special…

Education
7
Harrisburg University of Science and Technology

See schedule othe harrisburg university of science and technology offers innovative academic and research programs in science and technology that respond to local and global needs. the institution fosters a diverse community of learners,…

Education
8
Luzerne County Community College Foundation

Luzerne county community college provides excellence in education, fosters student success in achievement of goals, and positively impacts luzerne county and the surrounding northeastern pennsylvania region.

Education
9
Dunwoody College of Technology

Dunwoody college changes lives by building opportunities for graduates to have successful careers, to develop into leaders and entrepreneurs, and to engage in "the better performance of life's duties." quote is from the last will and…

Education
10
Sussex County Community College Foundation

The foundation for sussex county community college enhances the college's mission of providing educational excellence and cultural opportunities to the residents of sussex county and beyond. the foundation supports the mission through…

—
11
Gettysburg College

Gettysburg college is a residential, undergraduate college of the liberal arts and sciences.

Education
12
Harrisburg Area Community College Foundation

In partnership with students, educators, businesses and our diverse communities, hacc foundation fosters excellence in the educational, cultural, workforce development and economic growth of the college's service areas.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lehigh Carbon Community College Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Tamaqua Area Adult Day Care Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 98 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY PHILANTHROPIC FUND: $3,850,000 · OtherPENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY PHILANTHROPIC FUNDCARBON SCHUYLKILL COMM HOSP INC: $3,200,000 · OtherCARBON SCHUYLKILL COMM HOSP INCHELPING HARVEST FRESH FOOD BANK: $2,100,000 · OtherHELPING HARVEST FRESH FOOD BANKTAMAQUA AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT: $1,969,141 · OtherTAMAQUA AREA SCHOOL DISTRICTIndividual grant recipient: $1,840,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSCHUYLKILL COUNTY UNITED WAY: $660,000 · OtherGOOD SHEPARD: $600,000 · Other+84 more: $2,308,273 · Other+84 moreTAMAQUA AREA COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP: $2,170,000 · Community ImprovementTAMAQUA ARE…THE BLOOMSBURG UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONINC: $1,000,000 · EducationWILLIAMSON COLLEGE OF THE TRADES: $500,000 · EducationKUTZTOWN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $500,000 · Arts & CultureLEHIGH CARBON COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $492,025 · PhilanthropySCHUYLKILL WOMEN IN CRISIS: $50,000 · Human ServicesTAMAQUA AREA ADULT DAY CARE CENTER: $9,000 · Human Services
Other$16,527,664Community Improvement$2,170,000Education$1,500,000Arts & Culture$500,000Philanthropy$492,025Human Services$59,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTAMAQUA AREA COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP: $2,170,000 over 5y, 45% of budgetHELPING HARVEST FRESH FOOD BANK: $2,100,000 over 3y, 5.6% of budgetTHE BLOOMSBURG UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONINC: $1,000,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetWILLIAMSON COLLEGE OF THE TRADES: $500,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetKUTZTOWN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $500,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetLEHIGH CARBON COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $492,025 over 4y, 8.1% of budgetSCHUYLKILL WOMEN IN CRISIS: $50,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetTAMAQUA AREA ADULT DAY CARE CENTER: $9,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TAMAQUA AREA COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds HELPING HARVEST FRESH FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds THE BLOOMSBURG UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONINC ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAMSON COLLEGE OF THE TRADES ↗
  • Who funds KUTZTOWN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LEHIGH CARBON COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SCHUYLKILL WOMEN IN CRISIS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ppl FoundationPA15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ppl Foundation · Aetna Foundation Inc · United Way of the Greater Lehigh Valley · The Cigna Group Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Verizon Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John E Morgan Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John E Morgan Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to John E Morgan Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to John E Morgan Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 98 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on John E Morgan’s filings →

    More from the funding graph