Skip to content

· Private foundation

John and Vivian Sabel Family

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$69kArts & Culture$41kEducation$26kPhilanthropy$17kFood & Nutrition$11kSocial Science$11kInternational$8kCommunity Improvement$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$750
Median grant
1
States reached
$89k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF DENVER$10,000
DENVER HEALTH FOUNDATION$7,500
DENVER MUSEUM OF NATURE AND SCIENCE$5,000
DENVER BALLET GUILD$2,800
FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES$2,750
ARCS FOUNDATION$750
DENVER ART MUSEUM$550
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$500
COLORADO PUBLIC RADIO$200
ROCKY MOUNTAIN PBS$190
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$25
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WARREN VILLAGE: $6k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$182k · 15 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
13

Total granted

$182k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+21%

Still filing today

80%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHealthSocial ScienceFood & NutritionInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF DENVER
    4× · 2018–2025 · $26k · revenue +34%
  • DENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITALS FOUNDATION
    4× · 2018–2025 · $23k · revenue +168%
  • THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC
    3× · 2018–2021 · $11k · revenue +231%

Funded once

  • WV
    WARREN VILLAGE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $6k · revenue +82%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR CHINA US COOPERATION
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • RM
    ROCKY MOUNTAIN CHAPTER OF CHRONS CO
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Denver Metro Convention & Visitors Bureau

To bring conventions and leisure visitors to denver for the economic benefit of the city, the community, and our partners.

—
2
Denver Botanic Gardens Inc

The mission of denver botanic gardens is to connect people with plants, especially plants from the rocky mountain region and similar regions around the world, providing delight and enlightenment to everyone.

Environment
3
Colorado Gives Foundation

We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.

Philanthropy
4
Aia Colorado

AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…

—
5
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
6
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
7
The Denver Foundation

To inspire people and mobilize resources to strengthen our community.

Philanthropy
8
Mental Health Center of Boulder County Inc

Partnering to improve quality of life as a nonprofit organization dedicated to mental health and wellness. healing is our purpose, help is our promise, health is our passion.

—
9
Community Radio for Northern Colorado

Community radio for northern colorado's (crnc) mission is to strengthen our community by cultivating the mind and spirit - informing, inspiring, and entertaining. crnc strives to meet its mission by operating two public media services -…

Arts & Culture
10
Denver Metro Chamber of Commerce

The denver metro chamber of commerce is the architect of tomorrow, igniting change and driving progress to build dynamic economies and communities. we champion innovation, forge powerful partnerships, and relentlessly advocate for our…

—
11
Colorado Bar Association

To advance the science of jurisprudence, secure the more efficient administration of justice, encourage the adoption of proper legislation, advocate thorough and continuing legal education, uphold the honor and integrity of the bar,…

—
12
Denver Bar Association

To promote justice, its administration, and its availability to all sectors of society; to support and assist the membership in the delivery of legal services; to uphold the honor and dignity of the bar, and foster respect for the legal…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rocky Mountain Public Media Inc; the most unlike its peers is Englewood Rotary Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHRON COLITIS FOUNDATION: $40,700 · OtherCHRON COLITIS FOUNDATIONDENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITALS FOUNDATION: $22,500 · OtherDENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITALS FOUNDATIONENGLEWOOD ROTARY FOUNDATION INC: $16,940 · OtherENGLEWOOD ROTARY FOUNDATION INCARCS: $7,750 · OtherARCSCENTER FOR CHINA US COOPERATION: $5,000 · OtherENGLEWOOD ROTARY CLUB: $4,208 · Other+12 more: $8,300 · Other+12 moreColorado Museum of Natural History: $30,000 · Arts & CultureColorado Museum of Nat…DENVER ART MUSEUM: $3,645 · Arts & CultureDENVER ART MUSEUMPUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC: $3,200 · Arts & CulturePUBLIC BROADCASTING OF…Denver Ballet Guild: $2,800 · Arts & CultureDenver Ballet Guild+2 more: $1,510 · Arts & CultureUNIVERSITY OF DENVER: $26,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF DE…DENVER WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL DBA WORLDDE: $3,000 · EducationDENVER WORLD AFF…+1 more: $250 · EducationTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $10,500 · Social ScienceFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $9,300 · Food & NutritionWARREN VILLAGE INC: $5,500 · Human ServicesROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC: $3,100 · Health
Other$105,398Arts & Culture$41,155Education$29,250Social Science$10,500Food & Nutrition$9,300Human Services$5,500Health$3,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetColorado Museum of Natural History: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DENVER: $26,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITALS FOUNDATION: $22,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetENGLEWOOD ROTARY FOUNDATION INC: $16,940 over 6y, 9.8% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $10,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $9,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWARREN VILLAGE INC: $5,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDENVER ART MUSEUM: $3,645 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC: $3,200 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC: $3,100 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL DBA WORLDDE: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDenver Ballet Guild: $2,800 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetNATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $510 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO OPEN GOLF FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMON HOPE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Colorado Museum of Natural History ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DENVER ↗
  • Who funds DENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITALS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ENGLEWOOD ROTARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
  • Who funds WARREN VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds DENVER ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds DENVER WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL DBA WORLDDE ↗
  • Who funds Denver Ballet Guild ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO OPEN GOLF FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMON HOPE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

National Philanthropic TrustPA8.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John and Vivian Sabel Family funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John and Vivian Sabel Family. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on John and Vivian Sabel Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph