Skip to content

Colorado · Private foundation

John and Vivian Sabel Family

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
11
Grants FY2025
11
Organizations funded FY2024
18%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$750
Largest grant, FY2025
$10,000
Organizations funded a year
7 to 12
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$89k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 18% of the organizations John and Vivian Sabel Family funded were first-time grantees, receiving 7% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationSocial ScienceFood & NutritionHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving11$30k27%
FY202411$24k18%
FY20237$10k43%
FY202211$21k18%
FY20218$18k25%
FY20207$20k29%
FY20199$27k0%
FY201812$32k75%
93% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$69kArts & Culture$41kEducation$26kPhilanthropy$17kFood & Nutrition$11kSocial Science$11kInternational$8kCommunity Improvement$7kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 18 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 13 recipients with no EIN on record ($64k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget John and Vivian Sabel Family supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetColorado Museum of Natural History: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Denver: $26,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDenver Health and Hospitals Foundation: $22,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetEnglewood Rotary Foundation Inc: $16,940 over 6y, 9.8% of budgetThe Aspen Institute Inc: $10,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFood Bank of the Rockies: $9,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWarren Village Inc: $5,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDenver Art Museum: $3,645 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPublic Broadcasting of Colorado Inc: $3,200 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetRocky Mountain Planned Parenthood Inc: $3,100 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDenver World Affairs Council Dba Worldde: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDenver Ballet Guild: $2,800 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetNational Public Radio Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRocky Mountain Public Media Inc: $510 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetColorado Open Golf Foundation Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Virginia Foundation: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCommon Hope: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 17.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

National Philanthropic TrustPA8.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare John and Vivian Sabel Family with peer funders

About John and Vivian Sabel Family

How much does John and Vivian Sabel Family give?
John and Vivian Sabel Family reported 11 grants totaling $30,265 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 7 and 12 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does John and Vivian Sabel Family fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Health (34%), Arts & Culture (20%), Education (13%).
Who are John and Vivian Sabel Family's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Colorado Museum of Natural History ($30k), University of Denver ($26k), Denver Health and Hospitals Foundation ($23k).
Does John and Vivian Sabel Family fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 18% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does John and Vivian Sabel Family accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as John and Vivian Sabel Family?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include National Philanthropic Trust.
Where is John and Vivian Sabel Family based?
John and Vivian Sabel Family is based in CO.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on John and Vivian Sabel Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph