Skip to content

· Private foundation

John and Susan Brands Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$128k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$507kFood & Nutrition$260kEnvironment$180kArts & Culture$155kInternational$128kReligion$45kAnimals$38kPublic Safety & Disaster$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION$55,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$20,000
STRAY DOG THEATRE$20,000
ST LOUIS AREA FOODBANK$10,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$5,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$5,000
WICHITA KOREAN BAPTIST CHURCH$5,000
LUCKY K9 RESCUE$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 35% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DIRECT RELIEF: $10k → 14%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $10k → 17%STRAY DOG THEATRE: $25k → 21%FEEDING AMERICA: $10k → 14%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $25k → 7%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $10k → 17%ST LUKE'S HOSPITAL: $25k → 11%STRAY DOG THEATRE: $25k → 21%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $25k → 7%ST LUKE'S HOSPITAL: $25k → 11%STRAY DOG THEATRE: $20k → 21%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $20k → 7%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $20k → 17%ST LUKE'S HOSPITAL: $15k → 11%STRAY DOG THEATRE: $20k → 21%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $20k → 7%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $15k → 17%ST LUKE'S HOSPITAL: $12k → 11%STRAY DOG THEATRE: $20k → 21%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $20k → 7%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $15k → 17%ST LUKE'S HOSPITAL: $10k → 11%STRAY DOG THEATRE: $20k → 21%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $20k → 7%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $15k → 17%STRAY DOG THEATRE: $10k → 21%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $20k → 7%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $10k → 17%MERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $77k → 11%STRAY DOG THEATRE: $10k → 21%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $20k → 7%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $10k → 17%MERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $70k → 11%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $10k → 7%MERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $60k → 11%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $20k → 21%MERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $55k → 11%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $15k → 21%MERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $25k → 11%MERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $20k → 11%ST LOUIS AREA FOODBANK: $45k → 11%ST LOUIS AREA FOODBANK: $35k → 11%ST LOUIS AREA FOODBANK: $30k → 11%ST LOUIS AREA FOODBANK: $30k → 11%ST LOUIS AREA FOODBANK: $28k → 11%ST LOUIS AREA FOODBANK: $20k → 11%ST LOUIS AREA FOODBANK: $20k → 11%ST LOUIS AREA FOODBANK: $15k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
CA
MO
VA
KS
TN
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 15 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
3

Total granted

$1.2M
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+615%

Still filing today

60%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsInternationalCivil RightsArts & CultureFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SL
    ST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $233k · revenue +17%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $110k · revenue +98%
  • Feeding America
    4× · 2018–2023 · $25k · revenue +77%

Funded once

  • SS
    SUSQUEHANNA SPCA INC
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue -6%
  • BS
    BI STATE PET FOOD PANTRY
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • ME
    MYAKKA ELEPHANT RANCH INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +615%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
2
Stray Paws Rescue

Our organization believes it is our moral responsibility to protect and improve the lives of rescued animals and place them in loving permanent homes in st. louis metro.

Animals
3
Saving Saluda Strays
Animals
4
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Tampa Bay Florida Inc

Spca tampa bay is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization that operates pinellas county's only nonprofit for-all animal shelter assisting all animals in need, regardless of species or circumstance, at its 10-acre campus in largo. (continued on…

Animals
5
Rescue Pack

Established in 2016, rescue pack serves communities across the midwest to tackle pet food insecurity by recovering donated surplus pet food and supplies and redistributing them through charitable programs. we partner with animal welfare…

Animals
6
United Animal Nations Dba Redrover

To bring animals out of crisis and strengthen the bond between people and animals through emergency sheltering, disaster relief services, financial assistance and education. redrover accomplishes its mission by engaging volunteers and…

—
7
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County

The SPCA Monterey County's Mission is assuring compassionate treatment of all animals through rescue, rehabilitation, protection and education. The SPCA shelters homeless, neglected, and abused pets, including dogs, cats, horses, exotic…

Animals
8
Street Dog Hero

Serving dogs in need around the world and their communities through rescue, adoption, wellness, spay/neuter, and education. street dog hero envisions a world where all dogs are healthy, safe, cared for, and wanted.

Animals
9
Stray Rescue of St Louis

To rescue stray animals in need of medical attention, restore them to health, and place them in homes.

Animals
10
Humane World for Animals International

HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…

Animals
11
Nevada Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Nevada spca saves the lives of southern nevada's most vulnerable pets, inspires human companions to uphold the best possible care and increases the human-animal bond through adoption, foster and preventative care.

Animals
12
St Clouds Rescue
Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Louis Area Food Bank Inc; the most unlike its peers is Pride St Charles. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $307,000 · OtherMERCY HEALTH FOUNDATIONST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC: $233,000 · OtherST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INCTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $180,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYST LUKE'S HOSPITAL: $95,000 · OtherST LUKE'S HOSPITALPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $90,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODWICHITA KOREAN BAPTIST CHURCH: $45,000 · Other+5 more: $44,000 · OtherSTRAY DOG THEATRE: $155,000 · Arts & CultureSTRAY DOG THE…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $110,000 · InternationalMEDECINS S…DIRECT RELIEF: $18,000 · InternationalDIRECT REL…Feeding America: $25,000 · Food & NutritionElevated Access Inc: $15,000 · Civil RightsPRIDE ST CHARLES: $8,500 · Civil RightsTHE SOFT COATED WHEATEN TERRIER CLUB OF GREATER TAMPA BAY INC: $10,000 · AnimalsSUSQUEHANNA SPCA INC: $3,000 · AnimalsMYAKKA ELEPHANT RANCH INC: $1,000 · Animals
Other$994,000Arts & Culture$155,000International$128,000Food & Nutrition$25,000Civil Rights$23,500Animals$14,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC: $233,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $180,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSTRAY DOG THEATRE: $155,000 over 9y, 3.8% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $110,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $25,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $18,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetElevated Access Inc: $15,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetTHE BACKSTOPPERS INC FKA POLICEMEN & FIREMEN FUND OF ST LOUIS: $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSUSQUEHANNA SPCA INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMYAKKA ELEPHANT RANCH INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds STRAY DOG THEATRE ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds Elevated Access Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE BACKSTOPPERS INC FKA POLICEMEN & FIREMEN FUND OF ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds THE SOFT COATED WHEATEN TERRIER CLUB OF GREATER TAMPA BAY INC ↗
  • Who funds PRIDE ST CHARLES ↗
  • Who funds SUSQUEHANNA SPCA INC ↗
  • Who funds MYAKKA ELEPHANT RANCH INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John and Susan Brands Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John and Susan Brands Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on John and Susan Brands’ filings →

    More from the funding graph